TDP is supposed to be 95W for the Opteron DC up to 2.2GHz, just FYI - I'd suspect these to be no different . . .Originally Posted by Gogeta
TDP is supposed to be 95W for the Opteron DC up to 2.2GHz, just FYI - I'd suspect these to be no different . . .Originally Posted by Gogeta
You're a brave soul.
DFI NF4 SLI
AMD 4200+
BFG 6800 GT OC
Corsair XMS 4400
74GB Raptor
Soundblaster Audigy 2 ZS
Klipsch Promedia 5.1 Ultra
520W OCZ Powerstream
benches?
Doesnt look like it. I imagine it would complicate NDA if he gave us ANY performance numbers.benches?
Perkam
i might be being a bit dumb but if its 2.2 with dual core then that is 2x1.1 rather than 2x2.2
what about power output.. can you tel us that?
Then what was the sample shown by the Italian site, which was 939 2.4GHz 1MB L2 for EACH core?Originally Posted by sxs112
Are there going to be 2 sorts of Toledo parts?
http://www.hwupgrade.it/articoli/1193/1.html
"On board sono integrate due cache L2 distinte, ciascuna in quantitativo pari a 1 Mbyte."
Roughly: On board is integrated two DISTINCT L2 caches, EACH equal to 1MB in size.
My first inclination is that the Toledo chips are 512MB L2/core, and the Opteron DC (codename?) are 1MB L2/core, which would make sense considering a server/workstation environment makes excellent use of L2 . . .Originally Posted by terrace215
where can i buy 1 from ?
No, no. The Italian site was previewing a 2.4GHz socket 939 DC A64 part (so they claimed), not a DC Opteron part. Of course, like the current FX, and San Diego parts, there is little except the 939/940 packaging to distinguish 1xx Opteron from them.Originally Posted by matt9669
Perhaps AMD will have both parts? DC A64 2 x 512K L2, and DC A64 2 x 1MB L2... who knows, maybe they'll change their mind and brand the latter a DC A64 FX.
Hmm, Opteron DC's are only slated to 2.2GHz initially - but you're right, perhaps we will see an FX-style incarnation at 1MB/core . . .Originally Posted by terrace215
AMD has said the FX line will continue to be single core, so they would have to give it a new name it seems like . . .
Yeah, AMD did say that... but was that before or after Intel revealed the Smithfield EE brand?Originally Posted by matt9669
That might change their mind.
This is all correct.Originally Posted by [_Silence_]
Opteron 165 CCBWE 0550UPMW@2.5 GHz 1.3 V 1GB / A64 3500+ 512M / A64 3500+ 512M / AXP 2500+@400FSB 1GB / AXP 2500+@400FSB 512M / AXP 1700+@333FSB 256M / AXP 1700+@300FSB 256M / Athlon 1150 384M / Ferrari 3000 AXP 2500+ laptop
True, but as far as the latest info goes, the dual core 939 CPU will get a new brand name, just like Intel goes Pentium D for their desktop dual core part.Originally Posted by terrace215
Opteron 165 CCBWE 0550UPMW@2.5 GHz 1.3 V 1GB / A64 3500+ 512M / A64 3500+ 512M / AXP 2500+@400FSB 1GB / AXP 2500+@400FSB 512M / AXP 1700+@333FSB 256M / AXP 1700+@300FSB 256M / Athlon 1150 384M / Ferrari 3000 AXP 2500+ laptop
The Opteron dual cores are called Egypt, Italy and Denmark (8, 2, 1 series) and have 1 MB L2 per core. The Toledo (dual core A64 new brand name) is 512 kB per core.Originally Posted by [_Silence_]
http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/...18_608,00.html
Opteron 165 CCBWE 0550UPMW@2.5 GHz 1.3 V 1GB / A64 3500+ 512M / A64 3500+ 512M / AXP 2500+@400FSB 1GB / AXP 2500+@400FSB 512M / AXP 1700+@333FSB 256M / AXP 1700+@300FSB 256M / Athlon 1150 384M / Ferrari 3000 AXP 2500+ laptop
Thanks Pjotr, I know I had seen the roadmap and the codenames for the Opterons but I was too lazy to go look it upOriginally Posted by Pjotr
i know its a bit crazy wanting more than 4.4ghz combined, but does anyone have any idea on how these might overclock with the two cores? would they overclock simultaneously or seperatly, would they need real good air cooling to get responable temps?
I was looking at the opteron stepping comparison charts yesterday on AMD and noticed the E4 revision 200 series were approacing 90W+, so I assumed 2 cores would most likely exceed 100.Originally Posted by matt9669
Anyways, good to know AMD has done dual core right.
Less is more.
Why must we be incessantly teased by these new and unreleased products.
The cores cannot be clocked separately, and while the cooling requirements won't be drastically higher than single core (according to AMD) I would suggest very good air cooling
This behind the scenes info bothers you?Originally Posted by Orthogonal
nice!!!!!!! looking forward to seeing the new OC's from this hardware
A P4 660 You like your P4's dont you IbbyOriginally Posted by ibby
Bookmarks