3800+ Venice Screenies (Post #1 = FAQ)

**alexio** · 03-17-2005, 01:27 PM

In Arithmetic it is even slightly faster than the FX55 at the same speed, very nice with only the half amount of cache.

What vcore does it take to get it superpi 1m stable at 3.2ghz?, if it's possible at all.

**Vapor** · 03-17-2005, 01:29 PM

Wow, 3.2 @ 1.57 (and just about as fast as an FX at the same speed!)!! Let's see what more this chip can do!

**conrad.maranan** · 03-17-2005, 01:29 PM

Nice. This is getting better with every screenshot that you post up. I like the technique being used here: gradual build-up of excitement with intermittent posts.

Keep 'em coming.

**alexio** · 03-17-2005, 01:32 PM

Yeah, and I'm pushing him

**s7e9h3n** · 03-17-2005, 01:34 PM

Sorry, this is going to be a little OT, but I promised Kunaak these:

Unpatched:

Patched with SSE3 fix:

**MrQ3W** · 03-17-2005, 01:36 PM

Would be even nicer if it were a 3000+ or 3200+ doing this, think that is what most people will be getting unless they OC drastically worse.

**[XC] leviathan18** · 03-17-2005, 01:36 PM

nice really nice OC i would like to see tight times on memory and some prime perhaps thanks for all the info you are posting here

**RAndomaN** · 03-17-2005, 01:38 PM

just gets better, if this thing can get 3.3 then they are truly good chips. Nice SPi bench aswell, shows SSE3 is doing something :p

**esdee** · 03-17-2005, 01:40 PM

OMG if this is an avarage overclocker chip then comparing with Winchester looks like C0 Vs CG or TbredA Vs TbredB WTG AMD!!!

**[XC] leviathan18** · 03-17-2005, 01:48 PM

i dont get the sse3 fix? anyone can help me with that?

**Caper** · 03-17-2005, 01:51 PM

The 3800+ are sweet

Now...I am interested to see that 3500+ in action too

It would be very interesting to see how it behaves both on air and under subzero conditions.

If it behaves as good as the 3800+ or close to it, it would be great.

Good work s7e9h3n!

Edit: Congratulations, this thread are on many OC sites first pages....all over the world

**s7e9h3n** · 03-17-2005, 01:53 PM

3.2Ghz is as far as the 3800+ would go last night. I know she's got a bit more in her, but I'm reluctant to push a cpu which I hadn't originally planned on keeping. This morning, right before I left for work, she made the decision a little more difficult :

For reason unknown to me, temps with the cpu were better than they were last night even though ambient was warmer:

-31C Idle and -20C Load

**alexio** · 03-17-2005, 01:58 PM

Keep it and sell the FX55, the value of the FX55 will be half in a few weeks if I look at this :banana4:

Did you try 1.7V on the cpu btw?

**sparkie34** · 03-17-2005, 01:58 PM

Nice work!

**clockedOut** · 03-17-2005, 02:00 PM

Im sure he could sell this chip right now and get a good chunk of change.

**Vapor** · 03-17-2005, 02:00 PM

How about a subzero suicide, s7e9h3n?

**Caper** · 03-17-2005, 02:06 PM

Originally Posted by Vapor

How about a subzero suicide, s7e9h3n?

I would be more interested in a Prime95 run at 3200 Mhz.
By the screenshots I can see that he has it installed.

**Squid_Spit** · 03-17-2005, 02:11 PM

Sweet! Keep pushing it 3.4ghz should be possible.

**s7e9h3n** · 03-17-2005, 02:12 PM

When I took this shot last night, I thought that this was basically gonna be the ceiling, but am having to revise those ideas. This morning I was able to get through Sandra's bandwidth bench (~8600/8600mb/s) and the Cpu Bench was 80% complete when it dropped out of windows. This leads me to believe that, with the right settings, it may be possible to run some intensive i.e. 3dmark, Prime benches stable at ~3.2Ghz with this chip. I know it is irrelevant in terms of anything, but for what it's worth, I'm able to use clockgen to take this 3800+ to 3.4Ghz in windows - only to crap out everytime when I try to paste the screenshot

**Vapor** · 03-17-2005, 02:13 PM

Originally Posted by Caper

I would be more interested in a Prime95 run at 3200 Mhz.
By the screenshots I can see that he has it installed.

I'm also interested in that, but, from what I can tell, 3.2 is about all he'll get stable...so I want a suicide to see how far this can really go (even if it can't do jack).

EDIT: 3.4 seems to be the max to run it at...maybe 3.39 (

) is necessary to paste the screenshot.

**HARDCORECLOCKER** · 03-17-2005, 02:14 PM

Come on and wake up guys - no need to get nervous - this is "only" the new 3800+, what do You think we will see here in a few weeks from 4000+, 4200+ and FX-57 ???

Think the average of MHz will increase dramaticly.........

**alexio** · 03-17-2005, 02:14 PM

Try screenhunter: http://www.download.com/ScreenHunter...ml?tag=lst-0-1

**s7e9h3n** · 03-17-2005, 02:16 PM

Originally Posted by alexio

Keep it and sell the FX55, the value of the FX55 will be half in a few weeks if I look at this :banana4:

Did you try 1.7V on the cpu btw?

That's one of the screenies I've misplaced

I've taken the cpu to 1.77 actual Vcore using max settings from bios + CoreCenter's setting to 1.85V. No amount of Vcore seems to make much of a difference in OC beyond ~1.66 - 1.7V.

**Pr0d1gy** · 03-17-2005, 02:18 PM

Originally Posted by s7e9h3n

Note that you're not going to find any 3dmark benches here since I own an old 9800Pro Agp card (yeah, yeah - I was waiting to switch to pci-express).

Hey I will trade you my SLI setup for that Venice

**Vapor** · 03-17-2005, 02:21 PM

Originally Posted by HARDCORECLOCKER

Come on and wake up guys - no need to get nervous - this is "only" the new 3800+, what do You think we will see here in a few weeks from 4000+, 4200+ and FX-57 ???

Think the average of MHz will increase dramaticly.........

IDK about how well the 4000+ and FX-57 should clock (maybe 3.25/3.35 stable with the same phasechange as s7e9h3n [this is of course a guess]), but shouldn't the 4200+ be the same as the 3800+ (4200+ = 2.6GHz, 512k, right?) if AMD doesn't bin??

Thread: 3800+ Venice Screenies (Post #1 = FAQ)

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions