Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: MSI Neo2 Platinum Modded 1.5 BIOS

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    52

    MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum Modded 1.5 BIOS

    There new offical Neo2 BIOS available. Version 1.5
    Here's a modded version for you Bios15mod.rar
    Last edited by MMIQHW; 03-11-2005 at 06:13 PM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,858
    What are the updates / etc? Did you try it? More info needed!
    i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
    Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
    Quote Originally Posted by CompGeek
    The US is the only country that doesn't use [nuclear weapons] to terrorize other countries. The US is based on Christian values, unlike any other country in the world. Granted we are straying from our Christian heritage, but we still have a freedom aimed diplomatic stance.

  3. #3
    Xtreme 3DTeam Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Mason, MI... USA
    Posts
    1,199
    What CPU voltage can it really achieve? I'm not talking about settings but functional voltages.
    GA-P35-DS3L no more than 450fsb w/1333 chip
    E6550 stuck at 3150
    V-DATA 2x1gb
    MSI 7900GS 512 3Dmark score in near future
    Old A64 scores2001 39,707 3D03 23,768 3D05 11,394 3D06 5914

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    201
    plz more infos about the bios

    No Overlocking Today

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    81
    do you want us to try it first?
    some info plz.
    amd64 3000+
    msi neo2 plat. nf3
    tmsp pc3500 bh-5
    6600gt chaintech
    antec 450watt

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    52
    Sucks. Sorry to say. Voltages only to +10% and my machine didn't even boot to windows (at stock) but froze before initial "Windows" progress bar came up. Back to 1.36b.

    CP

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    2
    bad news: highest voltage+10%
    testing for higher frequency (375 with 1.41mod)
    Last edited by jumpman; 03-12-2005 at 04:54 AM.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    52
    Well, I've made that file for myself. It's running perfect on my machine. All hidden entrys are usable. Voltage max is 10%. That is enough for me to reach 2700 Mhz. The only BIOS with up to 18,3% is 1.36bmod. People needing high voltages should use 1.36b.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,858
    Anybody got any good results?
    i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
    Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
    Quote Originally Posted by CompGeek
    The US is the only country that doesn't use [nuclear weapons] to terrorize other countries. The US is based on Christian values, unlike any other country in the world. Granted we are straying from our Christian heritage, but we still have a freedom aimed diplomatic stance.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Edmonton Alberta
    Posts
    955
    im waiting for more people to state how this and the official bios are working before i change from the 1.4

  11. #11
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,858
    MMIQHW
    Did you notice any improvements at all?
    i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
    Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
    Quote Originally Posted by CompGeek
    The US is the only country that doesn't use [nuclear weapons] to terrorize other countries. The US is based on Christian values, unlike any other country in the world. Granted we are straying from our Christian heritage, but we still have a freedom aimed diplomatic stance.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    19
    Running fine here with the official 1.5....

    It updated the Raid Bios to ver 4.81, and it might be my imagination but the system boots quicker and generally seems a tad snappier on large disk access
    [Case] Thermaltake Tsunami {2x 120mm + 1x 92mm}
    [Mobo] MSI K8N NEO 2 Nforce 3 Ultra
    [CPU] Athlon 64 FX-60 @ Stock
    [Cooler] Thermalright XP-90 + Panaflo 92mm
    [RAM] 2 x 1GB OCZ EL Plat XTC @ Stock
    [Gfx] Sapphire X1950pro @ 614/719
    [Sound] Audigy 2 ZS Platinum
    [Storage] 2 x WD Caviar 200 GB HD in RAID 0
    [Optical] LG 4160 Dual Layer DVD Burner + LG H44N Dual Layer DVD Burner
    [PSU] Enermax 550W {+3.3V = 36A}{+5V = 36A}{+12V = 36A}{-5V = 1A}{-12V = 1A}{+5Vsb = 2.2A}
    [Net] Draytek 2800G on Aquiss Max (3.5mb)

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    25
    this BIOS ocing potential is somewhat poor...it will give me BSOD at only 280 x 9 meanwhile 1.41mod easily goes past 290 x 9...as to conclude this BIOS dont suit my setup..so back to 1.41mod for me...
    AMD64 3200+ Winchester @ 2.7

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by PCcrazy
    this BIOS ocing potential is somewhat poor...it will give me BSOD at only 280 x 9 meanwhile 1.41mod easily goes past 290 x 9...as to conclude this BIOS dont suit my setup..so back to 1.41mod for me...
    Is the 1.41mod more stable for you than 1.36mod? Haven't tryed that but all I've tryed are a bit less stable than 1.36mod which I use, this new one, too. I only need 1.63vc (1.55+10%) for the 2700 I'm using now so perhaps I should try 1.41mod? Or are the differences only in mem settings which in any case are changed when a64 tweaker is used?
    A64 939 90nm naked 3200+@2740mhz 1.68Vc,
    Msi Neo2 342x8 HTx3,
    2x512MB DC Kingston VR 2.5VMem 1T-3-3-3-5-7-11-2-2-1-2-1.95us-16x-7x-6ns-2.0ns-16clks (133/200; 2740/12)=228.3mhz,
    Abit X800 Pro Vivo@XT PE 527/605 unmodded,
    74GB Raptor,250GB Maxtor DM10 7200rpm/16MB, Nec dvdrw,
    Viewsonic vp201b 20" LCD 16ms,
    Pixma ip4000, Sb Audigy 2 Value EAX4 (games), Chaintech AV-710 ENVY HT-S (music), Mx510&UltraX, Irman in serial port, watercooling 25-30C
    BeQuiet Blackline 450W (5V 45A / 12V 22A / 3.3V 28A)

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    25
    Saulos..apparently it seems that 1.41mod is the best setup after trying several bioses including 1.36mod and 1.37mod...BTW have yet to try 1.5mod actually. I tried official 1.5,
    Unable to get a good result as far as im concerned..Different systems different setups as i can conclude here...Anyone tried 1.52 beta?
    AMD64 3200+ Winchester @ 2.7

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •