Low latency, HIGH HTT, who wins??

[Carlos Henrique]

- is it only me not understanding this ???

252 x 10(cpu multi) at 1/1(mem divider = 10) u got 252mhz mem clock

280 x 10(cpu multi) plus 11 mem divider u got 254mhz mem clock, but 252x10 = better by 200mbps

[HARDCORECLOCKER]

252 x 10(cpu multi) at 1/1(mem divider = 10) u got 252mhz mem clock

280 x 10(cpu multi) plus 11 mem divider u got 254mhz mem clock, but 252x10 = better by 200mbps

THX - my bad, didn't understand "11 mem divider" bacause thought of 133-166-200..........