Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678
Results 176 to 192 of 192

Thread: Dothan screams like scalded CAT!!!

  1. #176
    INTEL inside
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Québec, Canada
    Posts
    3,258
    oc'ed dothan 2.0 + sp-94 + panaflo l1a undervolted =
    retired computer enthusiast

  2. #177
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    318
    I want to see what one of these will do under Phase, or very good watercooling.

    With better on-board features, we could be looking at the next great overclocker's chip. From what I have read, it is all about the motherboard at this point.

    Better motherboards = better memory performance/limits. Better memory performance/limits = better across-the-board performance

  3. #178
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by Supertim0r
    oc'ed dothan 2.0 + sp-94 + panaflo l1a undervolted =
    Heck you might not even need the panaflo in a well vented case.

    That's what I'm most interested in about Dothan.. Building a truley silent SSF box that can still perform. Need to fiqure out something with Vcards though.

    That BFG I have you can literally hear in the next room.

  4. #179
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    OZtralia
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by bigtoe
    DFI's new board.



    I have word Asus maybe doing a board also thats 915 based with Dual ddr1 support.
    what is wrong with this picture?, i see 2 ide channels and no second controller
    2.8c (M0) @ 3.8 cooled by XP120 + Panaflo/MSI Neo 875P FIS2R/9800 Pro/2x512 GEIL Ultra Plat. PC4000/2xWD1200JD Raid0 + 1xWD1600JB/Pioneer 120s + 107D/LianLi 60/Antec 480/Diamondtron 93sb

  5. #180
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    375
    Quote Originally Posted by Zebo
    Will that fix these problems?



    All due to memory right?
    I think Charlie's talking about jumping from SC FSB100/133 to DC FSB200, which would accelerate the Dothan quite dramatically - just look at how it reacts to going from 1:1 to 3:4
    | Pentium-M 730 SL86G 1.60@2.81GHz | ASUS P4P800SE w/ CT-479 | 2x512MB BH-5 | 1M @ 26s | Windows XP SP2 |
    | Athlon64 3000+ E6 LBBWE 0544EPHW | ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 | WinXP and various Linux distros | Currently enjoying:


  6. #181
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    532
    AOpen 915
    Last edited by Zebo; 01-23-2005 at 07:14 PM.

  7. #182
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    InDaRimbOE
    Posts
    309
    Quote Originally Posted by bigtoe
    DFI's new board.



    I have word Asus maybe doing a board also thats 915 based with Dual ddr1 support.
    Uhm, on the picture it says 852/855 GME on the right side of the socket... so this isn't a DFI with 915 chipset but the pro moddel of DFI's i855 board, the one fugger reported about earlier, right?
    Halt On : No Errors

    My cup is half full, yours is emtpy... now THAT's optimism

    horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae: A64 FX OC record on Dry Ice by Jort, kristos, troid, C_X and "Moortgat"

    Originally posted by lazyman
    You are in trouble only if you admit it. Intel is never in trouble.

  8. #183
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    cairns > australia (ex-germany)
    Posts
    775
    right,

    oh and bigtoe... any chance to get a bit more info on that asus 915 with dc-ddr1? that sounds like a true winner right there.
    sky / s!p - we are oldskool, dammit.

  9. #184
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    126
    I cant wait for dual channel on the Dothan. We need a new King of the Hill.

  10. #185
    Xtreme 3DTeam Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    AMD factory
    Posts
    2,288
    Quote Originally Posted by Franky 4 Finger
    I cant wait for dual channel on the Dothan. We need a new King of the Hill.
    Yep - will be a nice one, but does it work like this:



    Previous system:


    DFI NF4 ULTRA 0453A3 KOREA CHIPSET / BIOS 510-2FIX / FX-57 0516WPMW@3.62GHZ / 2x256 CORSAIR 3200LLPT BH-5@13x278MHZ 2-2-2-5@3.69VDIMM / MACH II GT@MOD BY BERKUT / ACTIVE COOLING FOR RAM - MOSFETS - GPU RAM / CHIPSET & GPU CORE WATERCOOLED / OCZ POWERSTEAM 600W / BUILT BY ATI X850XT@660/651 - VGPU@1.73-VDD@2.26-VDDQ@2.21 PENCIL MOD / WIN XP 2x80GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP80 SATA - RAID 0 & WIN 2K 40GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP40 IDE BENCH DRIVE / PIC


    ----------------><------------------

  11. #186
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Perth, Western Australia
    Posts
    1,622
    i made a post about this in the news section and it disappered
    sonoma is better than nforce4, not sure how AMR compares
    but in aust, 400 for 725 dothan 1.7g and another 400 for the aopen. god knows how much the new one wil be
    Quote Originally Posted by bh2k
    sorry m, OI'm a bit drunkz!
    Air benches with 3000+, DFI nf3 and 6800GT 2001SE: 26312 3d03: 13028

  12. #187
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    ...but reconfiguring the cpu die to accept higher fsb, more bandwidth and so on isn't something that can happen instantly.
    There are documented issues that stopped the release of speeds of dothans initially as they couldn't get certain fsb's working, i can't remember exactly but i think the dothan was supposed to be a 200Mhz fsb part, but it simply wouldn't work at that, in single channel, so was released at a lower fsb. SO there are issues there.
    Really?

    (by TAM)

    Nothing wrong w/ Dothan and high FSB

  13. #188
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    hmmm thats odd, i thougt those chips can only do 200fsb max?
    is this a new revision or was the chipset limiting after all and not the cpu interface?

  14. #189
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    2,559
    The original Dothan mobos (like DFIs i855 and AOpen i855) couldn't run high FSB.
    Now with the adapter and i865/875 mobos things seem to be totally different.

  15. #190
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    ahhh so it was the chipset after all! good to know
    i should get one of those boards with adapter then and see what my old 1.4ghz banias can do ^^

    it survived all those tests with my homebuilt pentium m adapter that i never managed to finish ^^
    time to let it have some fun after all those months of torture

  16. #191
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    161
    I figure this might be the thread to ask the following question, what is the average OC for dothan's on air, and does initial speed make much of a difference. The reason I ask is people have found a way to OC dell 9300 notebooks, by grounding a pin on the 400 mhz fsb variants which allows:
    1.5 ghz to 2.0 ghz
    1.6 ghz to 2.13 ghz
    1.7 ghz to 2.26 ghz
    1.8 ghz to 2.4 ghz

    since you can only go to one speed (this is partly true) you must be stable at the higher speed. Anyway people have had very good results up to 2.13 ghz with some success at 2.26 ghz, but 2.26 ghz and 2.4 ghz is not very consistent....I'm just wondering if this good be a PSU issue or is it necessarily a processor issue?

  17. #192
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868

    Wink

    Quote Originally Posted by socrilles
    I figure this might be the thread to ask the following question, what is the average OC for dothan's on air, and does initial speed make much of a difference. The reason I ask is people have found a way to OC dell 9300 notebooks, by grounding a pin on the 400 mhz fsb variants which allows:
    1.5 ghz to 2.0 ghz
    1.6 ghz to 2.13 ghz
    1.7 ghz to 2.26 ghz
    1.8 ghz to 2.4 ghz

    since you can only go to one speed (this is partly true) you must be stable at the higher speed. Anyway people have had very good results up to 2.13 ghz with some success at 2.26 ghz, but 2.26 ghz and 2.4 ghz is not very consistent....I'm just wondering if this good be a PSU issue or is it necessarily a processor issue?
    Or a heat issue...after all it is in a confined notebook.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •