oc'ed dothan 2.0 + sp-94 + panaflo l1a undervolted =![]()
![]()
oc'ed dothan 2.0 + sp-94 + panaflo l1a undervolted =![]()
![]()
retired computer enthusiast
I want to see what one of these will do under Phase, or very good watercooling.
With better on-board features, we could be looking at the next great overclocker's chip. From what I have read, it is all about the motherboard at this point.
Better motherboards = better memory performance/limits. Better memory performance/limits = better across-the-board performance
Heck you might not even need the panaflo in a well vented case.Originally Posted by Supertim0r
That's what I'm most interested in about Dothan.. Building a truley silent SSF box that can still perform. Need to fiqure out something with Vcards though.
That BFG I have you can literally hear in the next room.![]()
what is wrong with this picture?, i see 2 ide channels and no second controllerOriginally Posted by bigtoe
![]()
2.8c (M0) @ 3.8 cooled by XP120 + Panaflo/MSI Neo 875P FIS2R/9800 Pro/2x512 GEIL Ultra Plat. PC4000/2xWD1200JD Raid0 + 1xWD1600JB/Pioneer 120s + 107D/LianLi 60/Antec 480/Diamondtron 93sb
I think Charlie's talking about jumping from SC FSB100/133 to DC FSB200, which would accelerate the Dothan quite dramatically - just look at how it reacts to going from 1:1 to 3:4Originally Posted by Zebo
![]()
| Pentium-M 730 SL86G 1.60@2.81GHz | ASUS P4P800SE w/ CT-479 | 2x512MB BH-5 | 1M @ 26s | Windows XP SP2 |
| Athlon64 3000+ E6 LBBWE 0544EPHW | ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 | WinXP and various Linux distros | Currently enjoying:
AOpen 915![]()
![]()
Last edited by Zebo; 01-23-2005 at 07:14 PM.
Uhm, on the picture it says 852/855 GME on the right side of the socket... so this isn't a DFI with 915 chipset but the pro moddel of DFI's i855 board, the one fugger reported about earlier, right?Originally Posted by bigtoe
Halt On : No Errors
My cup is half full, yours is emtpy... now THAT's optimism
horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae: A64 FX OC record on Dry Ice by Jort, kristos, troid, C_X and "Moortgat"
Originally posted by lazyman
You are in trouble only if you admit it. Intel is never in trouble.
right,
oh and bigtoe... any chance to get a bit more info on that asus 915 with dc-ddr1? that sounds like a true winner right there.
sky / s!p - we are oldskool, dammit.
I cant wait for dual channel on the Dothan. We need a new King of the Hill.
Originally Posted by Franky 4 Finger
Yep - will be a nice one, but does it work like this:
![]()
![]()
Previous system:
DFI NF4 ULTRA 0453A3 KOREA CHIPSET / BIOS 510-2FIX / FX-57 0516WPMW@3.62GHZ / 2x256 CORSAIR 3200LLPT BH-5@13x278MHZ 2-2-2-5@3.69VDIMM / MACH II GT@MOD BY BERKUT / ACTIVE COOLING FOR RAM - MOSFETS - GPU RAM / CHIPSET & GPU CORE WATERCOOLED / OCZ POWERSTEAM 600W / BUILT BY ATI X850XT@660/651 - VGPU@1.73-VDD@2.26-VDDQ@2.21 PENCIL MOD / WIN XP 2x80GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP80 SATA - RAID 0 & WIN 2K 40GB SAMSUNG SPINPOINT SP40 IDE BENCH DRIVE / PIC
![]()
----------------><------------------
i made a post about this in the news section and it disappered
sonoma is better than nforce4, not sure how AMR compares
but in aust, 400 for 725 dothan 1.7g and another 400 for the aopen. god knows how much the new one wil be
Really?...but reconfiguring the cpu die to accept higher fsb, more bandwidth and so on isn't something that can happen instantly.
There are documented issues that stopped the release of speeds of dothans initially as they couldn't get certain fsb's working, i can't remember exactly but i think the dothan was supposed to be a 200Mhz fsb part, but it simply wouldn't work at that, in single channel, so was released at a lower fsb. SO there are issues there.
(by TAM)
Nothing wrong w/ Dothan and high FSB![]()
hmmm thats odd, i thougt those chips can only do 200fsb max?
is this a new revision or was the chipset limiting after all and not the cpu interface?
The original Dothan mobos (like DFIs i855 and AOpen i855) couldn't run high FSB.
Now with the adapter and i865/875 mobos things seem to be totally different.
ahhh so it was the chipset after all! good to know
i should get one of those boards with adapter then and see what my old 1.4ghz banias can do ^^
it survived all those tests with my homebuilt pentium m adapter that i never managed to finish ^^
time to let it have some fun after all those months of torture![]()
I figure this might be the thread to ask the following question, what is the average OC for dothan's on air, and does initial speed make much of a difference. The reason I ask is people have found a way to OC dell 9300 notebooks, by grounding a pin on the 400 mhz fsb variants which allows:
1.5 ghz to 2.0 ghz
1.6 ghz to 2.13 ghz
1.7 ghz to 2.26 ghz
1.8 ghz to 2.4 ghz
since you can only go to one speed (this is partly true) you must be stable at the higher speed. Anyway people have had very good results up to 2.13 ghz with some success at 2.26 ghz, but 2.26 ghz and 2.4 ghz is not very consistent....I'm just wondering if this good be a PSU issue or is it necessarily a processor issue?
Or a heat issue...after all it is in a confined notebook.Originally Posted by socrilles
System
ASUS Z170-Pro
Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
Samsung 850 EVO (2)
EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
Corsair Hydro H90
NZXT S340
Bookmarks