MMM
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 127

Thread: New Gskill Pc4800 La @ddr660 1t

  1. #51
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    133
    Are the LE's rated at PC 4400 @ 1T or 2T?

  2. #52
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    4,477
    Think they're rated at 1T.
    Rig #1
    Gigabyte P67A-UD4 trying to figure out this POS board
    2600k @ ?????
    2x2Gb GSkill RipJaws-X 1333 (7-7-7-21)
    ATI 5850
    Coba Nitrox 750W
    Watercooled with HK 3.0 CU, Watercool GPU-X³ 5870 Nickel, PA120.3, Laing Ultra with XSPC top


    Rig #2
    DFI UT P35-T2R (0317 bios)
    E8200 @ 4000 (1.216V) / 4100 (1.248V) / 4200 (1.296V) / 4300 (1.344V)
    2x2Gb Chaintech Apogee GT PC2-8500
    Powercolor 4870
    Corsair 520HX
    Watercooled with HK 3.0 CU, EK-FC4870, Feser tripple, Laing Ultra pump


    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    I've got Supermicro boards that lasted longer than one of my marriages!

  3. #53
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    133
    Ok, so

    LA's are rated @ PC4800/ 300 FSB @ 2T 2.5-2-2-8

    LE's are rated @ PC4400/ 275 FSB @ 1T 2.5-3-3-7

    There is quite a trade off to be had there between the higher FSB and timings. I wonder which would actually be better. What will both max out at, I can't really see that many chips being able to do much over what the LE's have to offer anyway really (apart from the FX's).

    Mind you, i like the possibility that they may yeild better results with higher voltages, especially with the DFI coming out!

  4. #54
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Quote Originally Posted by Brum Man
    Ok, so

    LA's are rated @ PC4800/ 300 FSB @ 2T 2.5-2-2-8

    LE's are rated @ PC4400/ 275 FSB @ 1T 2.5-3-3-7

    There is quite a trade off to be had there between the higher FSB and timings. I wonder which would actually be better. What will both max out at, I can't really see that many chips being able to do much over what the LE's have to offer anyway really (apart from the FX's).

    Mind you, i like the possibility that they may yeild better results with higher voltages, especially with the DFI coming out!

    As I can honestly tell, Oskar mainly test LP NF4 on old non-rated Gskill 0425 TCCD 512x2 and 256x2 ram
    That really surprised me a lot when he can got it up to more than DDR700 w/ all 3d marks complete.(256x2)

    OPB

  5. #55
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    247
    OPB,, can you tell me why you think/like the 437 the best ?

    I would have thought the later chips would have been better ?

  6. #56
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Quote Originally Posted by Jessfm
    OPB,, can you tell me why you think/like the 437 the best ?

    I would have thought the later chips would have been better ?

    ok, that's really weird thing never happened before:

    I forgot the name from our forum, a gentleman he pm me regarding his 1g LE got problem(purchased from excaliber), after I read his PM, I think , it definitely should be mobo's prob. I think it's av8(abit), so I got his rma. According to his situation, he told me like he could not get the ram running at 260(I forgot) "3-4-4-8".. and that ram IC dated 437.
    you know what? from that moment until now, I always use that pair of ram, this pair of 1g dual LE on NF4 get me like DDR625 2.5-3-3-7 definitely 1t CMD not loaded from NF4 CG, it was done by bios setting. I can say, in this world, nobody can do this:
    What you guys think?
    but 437 is hard to find.

  7. #57
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    109
    Quote Originally Posted by Onepagebook
    ok, that's really weird thing never happened before:

    I forgot the name from our forum, a gentleman he pm me regarding his 1g LE got problem(purchased from excaliber), after I read his PM, I think , it definitely should be mobo's prob. I think it's av8(abit), so I got his rma. According to his situation, he told me like he could not get the ram running at 260(I forgot) "3-4-4-8".. and that ram IC dated 437.
    you know what? from that moment until now, I always use that pair of ram, this pair of 1g dual LE on NF4 get me like DDR625 2.5-3-3-7 definitely 1t CMD not loaded from NF4 CG, it was done by bios setting. I can say, in this world, nobody can do this:
    What you guys think?
    but 437 is hard to find.
    Hehe - I have a 1 Gig set (2 x512) LE's with TCCD 437 chips. I'll sell to the first one to cough up $400.00. Hahaha - Hell, I'll even through in the Tt Truelight LED Heat Spreaders
    F1-3200DSU2-1GBLE PC4400(DDR550) 2.5-3-3-7 PC3200 2-2-2-5 (Dual channel)

    Pictures here: http://www.fx-55.com/watercool/
    Last edited by RAINFIRE; 01-05-2005 at 06:26 PM.
    Which way is it to Vardala?

  8. #58
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Pictures here: http://www.fx-55.com/watercool/[/QUOTE]


    Nice, really nice!

  9. #59
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Il
    Posts
    746
    i have those same exact chips rainfire, exact same code on them.

    except no computer to put them in,

    look at sig......
    Biostar A780 mATX
    AMD Phenom II x2 (Unlocked to x4) Stock Clock/Heatsink
    ATI X850XTPE Stock
    OCZ 2x2GB DDR2-800
    Seagate 320GB 16MB Cache Sata 3.0


    heatware: skip86

  10. #60
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    247
    Thanks for that OPB,

    As it turns out I have 437 TCCD on my Cosair 3200XL, but the codes at the bottom of chip are slightly different a mix of BMGL74A2 and BMGL74P2 's

  11. #61
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Mrki
    For take WR or only benches 2x256 are sure better!

    But for the games today you need 2x512 ...
    i disagree, the only thing i benifit by from having 2x512 is smoother windows peroformance, i dont gain or lose fps from only having 512, so unless im missing something or playing the wrong games...

  12. #62
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Germany, Munich
    Posts
    201
    play some ram based games like world of warcraft, where there is a HUGE difference between 512 and 1024

  13. #63
    Xtreme 3DTeam Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    87
    crap , i think i have even olden chips

    512mb Gskill Pc4800 La // Samsung 431 // k4h560838F-TCCD
    with a 3-4-4-8@600 sticker
    10042 3Dmark2005 /No1 6800SLi
    20280 3Dmark2003 /No1 6800SLi

    ** Grtz L@TrO **

  14. #64
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    Quote Originally Posted by L@TrO
    crap , i think i have even olden chips

    512mb Gskill Pc4800 La // Samsung 431 // k4h560838F-TCCD
    with a 3-4-4-8@600 sticker

    is that old? nah...sometimes you just can't blame on RAM
    Oskar test his NF4 by using the 0425 Gskill TCCD, that 's not even rated at 3-4-4-8 DDR600 and he can do more than DDR700..
    That's what I can't figure out!

    ** I also play a ot of 431, not bad at all.


    OPB

  15. #65
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Switzerland DownTown
    Posts
    228
    Quote Originally Posted by Revv23
    i disagree, the only thing i benifit by from having 2x512 is smoother windows peroformance, i dont gain or lose fps from only having 512, so unless im missing something or playing the wrong games...
    Thats true!

    You dont have more fps with 2x512 then 2x256 but loading games and performance in games and closing games you will see the differentiated!

    will you have 2x512 you never want back to 2x256
    3000+ Winchester
    DFI SLI-D
    2x512 OCZ EL Rev.2
    OCZ 520Watt
    2x6800GT Inno3D SLI

  16. #66
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Edmonton Alberta
    Posts
    955
    you do gain a few fps aswell, not like a huge increase but you do gain some

  17. #67
    XS Intel News & D²OL enhanced
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,205
    its much smoother...

  18. #68
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Mrki
    Thats true!

    You dont have more fps with 2x512 then 2x256 but loading games and performance in games and closing games you will see the differentiated!

    will you have 2x512 you never want back to 2x256

    thats funny i went from 1gb to 512...

    but i guess the 30 mhz fsb i gained not to mention being able to run CPC On more then made up for it.

    sure if theres 2x512 that will clock just as good im all over it, but i dont really have a problem with 2x256 as long as im clocking higher... but then again i dont play Wow, which might want more ram, who knows, i still have this bh-5 in my IC7 waiting for Vmod, didnt do so well on my AMD though.

  19. #69
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    109
    Hahaha - I'd have 2 Gigs of that G.Skill LE RAM if I could afford - it hella matters to me.

    IMHO - MORE RAM ALWAYS = BETTER!!
    Which way is it to Vardala?

  20. #70
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    2,055
    Quote Originally Posted by Jupiler
    Indeed it is, and specialy with 2*512 sticks.

    To bad. I had high expectations.
    I do have the same modules and there“ doing aprox the same (btw. mine“s pc4400) I had high expectations too I cant even get windows stable with 270 1gb 2.5-3-3-7.
    "M-I-A"

  21. #71
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    822
    Quote Originally Posted by Revv23
    i disagree, the only thing i benifit by from having 2x512 is smoother windows peroformance, i dont gain or lose fps from only having 512, so unless im missing something or playing the wrong games...
    Yes, you're playing the wrong games.

    Unreal Tournament 2004 loads up and has to page file if you have 512K. Talk about slow loads. You'll be killed twice when you spawn into online games before you are able to defend yourself.

    1024 totally changed my UT 2004 game experience.
    <----- REST IN PEACE, KIT. 1993-2007.


  22. #72
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    247
    I not had a comp that was 512K since the Amiga :banana4:

  23. #73
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    lol


    well i still have a rig with 1024 so we shall see, im a FPS dude and HL2/Doom3 seem to do alright.

  24. #74
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    861
    download the 7 day trial of planetside
    play with 512mb then play with 1 gig, you will see the difference

    so, any ETA on when we can buy this stuff here in the US?

  25. #75
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    5,931
    ^yes but planetside sucks.

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •