How much voltage will TCCD take before it gets damaged?
How much voltage will TCCD take before it gets damaged?
My Rig:
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2600 MHz
Nvidia 6800 GT @ 410/1100
Corsair XLPT @ DDR520 (CL 2.5) 1t
74GB WD Raptor
NEC Dual Layer DVD-RW Burner
I think after 3.6V it will be damaged.![]()
Anyone have tried it?![]()
![]()
Opteron 170 @ 2.2Ghz - Zalman 9700
OCZ Pc3200 2x512Mb VX @ 220Mhz
DFI nF4 SLI-DR ( 3.29 BIOS )
Leadtek 6800GT@415-1120
Seagate Barracuda 2x120Gb Raid0
This is the rule :P
For tccd431 2.65/2.7V is the spot and for tccd440 it can go higher(prolly even at 3.0V up)
How to know if they are 440?![]()
Using CPU-Z?![]()
Opteron 170 @ 2.2Ghz - Zalman 9700
OCZ Pc3200 2x512Mb VX @ 220Mhz
DFI nF4 SLI-DR ( 3.29 BIOS )
Leadtek 6800GT@415-1120
Seagate Barracuda 2x120Gb Raid0
This is the rule :P
No, by looking at chips.
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ NewCastle @ 240 x 10 = 2400 MHz @ 1.550 V
MSI K8N Neo Platinum 1.52 Beta BIOS
2x 512 MB DDR500 A-DATA Vitesta Hynix @ 240 MHz 1:1 2.5-3-3-7 1T 2.85V 24/7![]()
Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro R350
Enermax EG365AX-VE FMA 3.3V@32A 5V@32A 12V@26A
DVD-RW TEAC
Seagate 200 GB SATA + Maxtor 300 GB SATA
My TCCD 437 perform pretty good @ 3,2V
265 2335
300 3448
Just make sure to keep them cool if you start pumping some volts into them.
will heat spreaders do it? or do i need some sort of active cooling?
My Rig:
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ @ 2600 MHz
Nvidia 6800 GT @ 410/1100
Corsair XLPT @ DDR520 (CL 2.5) 1t
74GB WD Raptor
NEC Dual Layer DVD-RW Burner
Take the heat spreaders off, they hurt alot more than they help. Give the memory a weak 120MM fan and you will be good to go.
For those of you about to post:
how about keeping those heatspreaders and still put a 120mm on them?![]()
anybody take a look at the chips on the PQI Turbo PC3200s?
The PQI Turbo PC3200 w/XBL 2-2-2-5 have TCCD, dunno whether they'r 431 or 440..
i7 920@4.34 | Rampage II GENE | 6GB OCZ Reaper 1866 | 8800GT (zzz) | Corsair AX750 | Xonar Essence ST w/ 3x LME49720 | HiFiMAN EF2 Amplifier | Shure SRH840 | EK Supreme HF | Thermochill PA 120.3 | MCP355 | XSPC Reservoir | 3/8" ID Tubing
Phenom 9950BE @ 3400/2000 (CPU/NB) | Gigabyte MA790GP-DS4H | HD4850 | 4GB Corsair DHX @850 | Corsair TX650W | T.R.U.E Push-Pull
E2160 @3.06 | ASUS P5K-Pro | BFG 8800GT | 4GB G.Skill @ 1040 | 600W Tt PP
A64 3000+ @2.87 | DFI-NF4 | 7800 GTX | Patriot 1GB DDR @610 | 550W FSP
how about hte ocz 3200 plat.. anyone know which they are...
My Gskill with TCCD 440 max vddr is 3.15v. Anything above is unstable.
Pulled the HS off my corsair and they are 437 TCCD. would I benefit from a 3.3Vmem mod ?
I can manage 300 @ 2.5,4,4,8 2T 2.8v but lose 1T at 280ish regardless ov Volts or timings.
Also is the AGPvolt and Chipsetvolt tied on the Neo2 board ?
tccd is so finicky about volts. it seems specific speeds need specific voltage or else ram becomes unstable. I have later tccd that like voltage. My best results at 280mhz+ is 3.1-3.3v I have pumped 3.6 volts into it and the ram still works fine. This is week 40 and higher.
Correct, with 431 TCCD high voltages only works with CL2.0-3-3-5.Originally Posted by trans am
With 440 TCCD i can hit up to 3.0v with CL2.5-3-3-7 and 3.15V with CL1.5-3-3-5.
rite now im using Kingston KHX3200ULK2/512.. izzit 437 or 440?
Thanks, Im just dragging through the rather long threads about TCCD now to see If there is a connection between dates and volts. Must be a week that something changed but what is it...
The trouble with most ICs (including TCCD) is they have built-in current regulation units, called "stabilitron"s. I don't remember exactly how a stabilitron works, but it's a very simple device, like a diode. These things only work in a certain voltage range, lower - it won't let the current through, and higher - it just puts out extra heat (heat causes instability). Theoretically speaking, if TCCD did not have these stabilitrons, it would react to increases in voltage much like our beloved Winbond chips. There are rumors that there is another kind of TCCD, "mobile" TCCD (edit: that supposedly doesn't have the current regulation circuitry for one reason, or another). There are also rumors that Mushkin is putting the said "mobile" TCCD on their pc3200 lvlII V2 sticks. Ne1 wanna try it out?![]()
Last edited by iddqd; 01-03-2005 at 01:20 PM.
Sigs are obnoxious.
Originally Posted by PhonyEye
Heat spreaders are insulators, they just keep the heat on the chips. The thermal pads are too thick, and even if you modified the retention mechanisim to work with regular thermal paste (In stock form they are designed to account for the thickness of the thermal pad) you really aren't adding to the surface area. Good heatsinks only work because of the extreme amount of surface area they have, the heatspreaders don't even have 50% more surface area. A XP120 has around 100 times the surface area of a cpu.
For those of you about to post:
Yeah. To make it worse, most companies use cheap double-sided tape, which is full of air pores. It's like putting a warm winter jacket on your ram.Originally Posted by craig588
Sigs are obnoxious.
You don't have to ask you the question what is the max voltage since they won't react the good way over 2.9V on most RAM's...
i have some tccd thats marked 440 and right now i got 2 sticks of 256 running 290x10 in my DFI 250UT/3400 system 2.5-3-3-7 2.7v should i be using more voltage for this speed? i have tried the 3.10v trick with the 2cas at high htt and the memory seems to be fine at 3.10v. i just neve put it that high cause at 2.7v i can run 2 sticks at 290 so im happy righ there....
peace perc,
I've got some 431 gskill and it runs 240mhz on 2.7v and 2.5-3-3-11 timings, but i'm on nf2 boardCan 431 do 2-3-3 with 2.9v? And does it like higher volts like 2.9v at higher speeds?
Bookmarks