For take WR or only benches 2x256 are sure better!
But for the games today you need 2x512 ...
For take WR or only benches 2x256 are sure better!
But for the games today you need 2x512 ...
3000+ Winchester
DFI SLI-D
2x512 OCZ EL Rev.2
OCZ 520Watt
2x6800GT Inno3D SLI
i disagree, the only thing i benifit by from having 2x512 is smoother windows peroformance, i dont gain or lose fps from only having 512, so unless im missing something or playing the wrong games...Originally Posted by Mrki
Thats true!
You dont have more fps with 2x512 then 2x256 but loading games and performance in games and closing games you will see the differentiated!
will you have 2x512 you never want back to 2x256
3000+ Winchester
DFI SLI-D
2x512 OCZ EL Rev.2
OCZ 520Watt
2x6800GT Inno3D SLI
Thats true!
You dont have more fps with 2x512 then 2x256 but loading games and performance in games and closing games you will see the differentiated!
will you have 2x512 you never want back to 2x256
thats funny i went from 1gb to 512...
but i guess the 30 mhz fsb i gained not to mention being able to run CPC On more then made up for it.
sure if theres 2x512 that will clock just as good im all over it, but i dont really have a problem with 2x256 as long as im clocking higher... but then again i dont play Wow, which might want more ram, who knows, i still have this bh-5 in my IC7 waiting for Vmod, didnt do so well on my AMD though.
Hahaha - I'd have 2 Gigs of that G.Skill LE RAM if I could afford - it hella matters to me.
IMHO - MORE RAM ALWAYS = BETTER!!
Which way is it to Vardala?
Yes, you're playing the wrong games.
Unreal Tournament 2004 loads up and has to page file if you have 512K. Talk about slow loads. You'll be killed twice when you spawn into online games before you are able to defend yourself.
1024 totally changed my UT 2004 game experience.
<----- REST IN PEACE, KIT. 1993-2007.
I not had a comp that was 512K since the Amiga :banana4:
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks