Quote Originally Posted by WiCKeD
So it seems you are basing that all on this:

andy, give up the crusade! Look, you found a chip that runs Prime stable, which disproves your theory, but instead of saying, "hmm okay maybe I'm wrong" you make up new conditions? Come on...
Let me out this in a way that we can all understand.

This is no crusade. I am in fact am a huge AMD fan. I work for a company that sells memory. We recently had several RMAs's based on P95 not working at overclocked speeds. Thorough testing by myself and many others has shown that there are issues with P95 and at least week pre-week 41 90nm CPU's.

If a CPU will not run Prime95 at stock speeds it seems logical that it will not run it at 260mhz. We needed to know what was going on and asked for help from our buddies here.

The results form this testing will save my company $$$$, our customers will save time and $$$$ from shipping costs. They are free to use whatever stabilty programs and CPU they like, BUT if their RMA is based on P95 results then we all need to be aware that a problem does between P95 and some CPU's.

I personally do have a perfect 3200+ 90nm week 41 that will run any program I choose for hour on end. Please read the entire thread and follow along to see the purpose and results of all testing.

I suggest that anyone failing Prime95 at overclocked speeds reset their BIOS to default and run the test again for a minimum of 7 hours. If you pass at stock speeds you should go to go, Test away.

Thanks