Everest memory tests

[Jeff]

Hmm... I like this benchmark. I'm only running a dual Xeon setup so nothing to spectacular from me.

Read: 4497 MB/s
Write: 1415 MB/s
Latency: 84.0 ns

Memory is only running at 2-2-2-6, 207MHz dual channel.

[Pimp!]

289 2.5-3-3-7


read = 8253
write = 2865
latency = 34.7


3200 winchester @ 9x289 (2600)
msi k8n neo2 plat
pdp (patriot) pc3200 xbl 2x512

[Zeus]

Zeus,
Nice latency there.
What's are timings for that latency?

Thanks.
You can my settings right here:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=47018

[Holst]

Thanks.
You can my settings right here:

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=47018

Right back at you mate.

Down to 36.2, this is at 260X10 with the below timings.

I did have 265 stable but ive tweaked my 3.3v line down to test this OCZ booster, so im Vdimm is very low ATM (stuck at 3.3)
260 at this low Vdimm isnt propperly stable either.. but once I get the booster working ill be able to get 265+ stable.

[Zeus]

Right back at you mate.

Down to 36.2, this is at 260X10 with the below timings.

I did have 265 stable but ive tweaked my 3.3v line down to test this OCZ booster, so im Vdimm is very low ATM (stuck at 3.3)
260 at this low Vdimm isnt propperly stable either.. but once I get the booster working ill be able to get 265+ stable.

Nice going Holst!
I gave my system hell but 36.5 was all she wrote.
Oh well, not too shabby for 2,5-3-3-7

[bachus_anonym]

another one from Polish OCer

MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum - Q47353.1 0440A2 S Taiwan
A64 3200+ 90nm "Winchester" - CBBFD 0441UPCW
Thermalright XP-90 w/ YTech 120mm

CLICK for Full Size Screenshot - 2048x1536 384KB



EDIT: oh, it looks like it's the best score so far let's wait until someone with FX shows up

[agenda2005]

another one from Polish OCer

MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum, 3200+ @ 270x10=2700MHz, HyperX PC3200 @ DDR540 6-2-2 cas2,
OCZ DDR Booster @ 3.7v if i'm not mistaken....

34.0 ns HERE - 384KB

EDIT: oh, it looks like it's the best score so far let's wait until someone with FX shows up

Man! that's a sick latency! That's the kind of latency I'm dreaming about (34-35ns) in dual channel with >8000MB/s Bandwith. Good job, I'm sure that's the lowest latency I've seen so far.

[bachus_anonym]

Man! that's a sick latency! That's the kind of latency I'm dreaming about (34-35ns) in dual channel with >8000MB/s Bandwith. Good job, I'm sure that's the lowest latency I've seen so far.

thanx agenda2005 i can do SuperPi 1M at 273x10, but not much changes in Latency department

[Pimp!]

bah i had the crown for a bit

[krampak]

I got 39'3ns at 250 2-2-2.

[Pedro Rocha]

Some number, from my FX-55 @ 3.330 in the Prometeia with 2 TCCD stick at 290Mhz, 2.5-3-3-6 with just 2.8v ..

[bachus_anonym]

nice going Pedro, do you have any BH-5 > 270MHz ??? i'm curious what it looks like with FX-55.... i mean latency.

BTW, i just saw a whopping 32.8ns @ 277x10 !!!!!

[Holst]

Blimey Bachus, thats super low latency.

Is that the same timings as in the pic above?

[bachus_anonym]

Blimey Bachus, thats super low latency.
Is that the same timings as in the pic above?

pretty much.... just TRTW lowered to 1 and Refresh Rate at 15.6ns

EDIT we need to invite Onepagebook here to see what his BH-5 @ 287 can do

[Zeus]

Nice numbers Bachus!

This once again proves how much faster the winnies are over the socket 754 winchesters.
I need 2830MHz for 31s SuperPi, but 32m takes me a little over 28 mins to finish, your 26 min 39sec is a lot better.

However latency doesn't suprise me, your timings are a lot better than mine.
For now you seem to have the best latency score.

[rapra]

and all the glory for Bachus...
Bachus, remember which whisper give You that
I have 35.1 in single channel - so Poland wins in Latencies! (for a moment)

[bachus_anonym]

Bachus, remember which whisper give You that

:thumbsup:

[aCidbAbY]

38.0ns latancy
1572mb/swrite
3828MB/s read

[agenda2005]

I am more Interested in Latency values. Here you go.

A64 3500+ DDR400 200MHz 2-2-2-10 Latency = 46.5ns

A64 3500+ DDR434 217MHz 2-2-2-10 Latency = 42.9ns

My BH-5 will be on ground tommorrow. I will play with higher Mem speed to see what happen. DDR533 2-2-2-10 will be interesting to compare with Intel DDR2. From the latency value, DDR2 sucks big time.

[ugp]

Here is what I got...havent tweaked it yet...

Latency @ 46.7ns

250x10.0 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3-0

Memory Write @ 1633MB/s
Memory Read @ 3849MB/s

Not sure if computer being rebooted fresh start would make a difference...my PC has been on for 3 days straight at these results...does anyone know if that makes a difference or not?

[STEvil]

some, but note a huge one.

[ugp]

Yeah after rebooting my Latency is 47.3ns...not really a big difference.

[agenda2005]

Here is what I got...havent tweaked it yet...

Latency @ 46.7ns

250x10.0 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3-0

Memory Write @ 1633MB/s
Memory Read @ 3849MB/s

Not sure if computer being rebooted fresh start would make a difference...my PC has been on for 3 days straight at these results...does anyone know if that makes a difference or not?

That latency is not good at DDR500, even with cas 2.5. I guess rebooting your computer makes no difference either.

[ugp]

That latency is not good at DDR500, even with cas 2.5. I guess rebooting your computer makes no difference either.

Well what I am trying to go for from my memory is bandwidth And I am assuming the higher the bandwidth the higher the latency goes up with it alittle right...well at CL2.5 anyway...

[Zeus]

Well what I am trying to go for from my memory is bandwidth And I am assuming the higher the bandwidth the higher the latency goes up with it alittle right...well at CL2.5 anyway...

Wrong assumption mate.
Check my bandwidth, it's over 5K in Sandra, my latency is as low as 36,5ns.
It has to do with memory settings.