MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Alternatives to water as a coolant?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    13

    Alternatives to water as a coolant?

    Hey all, I was just bored and started googling "heat transfer fluids" and got a ton of results, which made me curious, Are any of the synthetic industrial type fluids better for liquid cooling rather than water?? Of course, I realize that even if one of these fluids is better it would most likely cost way too much to warrent putting it into a PCs cooling loop, but it still makes you wonder if water is the best liguid for heat transfer then why do these companies offer up synthetics??

    Bill

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Andover, Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    118
    you can't get better than water, but it is not always best because it can corrode your system and facilitate the growth of algae
    Hail to extreme cooling!

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    490
    Perhaps quicksilver??? But that would weigh to much and probably destroy the pump...

    But i think there is 1... There must be... But then you would probably have to cool it down with more air... And it would cost more???

    But it cant be true that water is the best stuff???
    Last edited by Mini; 11-02-2004 at 03:14 AM.
    P4 3.0C 800@3.64 242FSB 1.625Vcore on Ic7 max3(Watercooled)
    Corsair 2x512@DDR484Mhz PC4000( 3-4-4-8 )2.8V
    X800XT@586/594(Watercooled)
    3*Maxtor 120 GB fluid +9 SATA RAID-0
    3Dmark01: 25250--Aquamark3: 66423--3Dmark03: 13780--3dmark05: 6361

  4. #4
    Unoriginal Macho Energy
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    3,158
    Quote Originally Posted by Mini
    But it cant be true that water is the best stuff???
    Why not? It is the best liquid in terms of thermal transfer and viscosity. Mercury has better thermal properties but is poisonous. NASA may have something better, but good old water is excellent.

    *:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*
    GTZ --> MCW-NBMAX --> EK FC --> PA 120.3 --> PA 160.1 --> 2x DDC Ultras in Series --> Custom Clear Res
    "Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity."
    *:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*'``'*:-.,_,.-:*

    Quote Originally Posted by ranker View Post
    Did you just get hit in the head with a heavy object? Because obviously you're failing at reading comprehension.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Andover, Massachusetts, USA
    Posts
    118
    yup, thx nikhsub1 for explaining, im tired right now, but I can agree al the way. Water does not have to be fancy and expensive to perform well lol
    Hail to extreme cooling!

  6. #6
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Connecticut (woodchipper State)
    Posts
    1,391
    This is an excellent question however H20's bonding properties are what make it so unique. Water molecules have an very high Specific heat Capacity (read the article) as it takes 4200J to heat 1-litre of water 1-degree centigrade. (J = Joule).

    Almost a year ago I mentioned Fluorinert FC-40 which has a boiling point of 155C, and pour point (freezing) of -57C, make it an ideal thermal transfer liquid. However, a liquid with such malleable thermal properties, and dialectric properties (safe for submergence of electrically conductive materials), doesn't necessarily mean it's latent heat properties are appropriate. Since were NOT discussing phase change this may not be problematic, but can we find a liquid with the bonding properties of H20, with better latent heat, and safe for common waterpumps?

    Could we use charged water?
    Last edited by Liquid3D; 11-26-2004 at 01:44 AM.
    Q6600 (8x401FSB 1.28Vcore)
    2x FX-74
    Gigabyte P35C-DS3R
    Asus L1N64-SLI
    Corsair DDR3-1800 2GB
    Geil DDR2-800 4x1GB
    BFG 8800Ultra
    Leadtek 7950GX2 DD GX2
    Tuniq 1200W
    NZXT 1200W
    Storm WB 775
    2x Swiftech Microdrive Socket-L

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson, Az, USA
    Posts
    978
    Quote Originally Posted by Liquid3D
    This is an excellent question however H20's bonding properties are what make it so unique. Water molecules have an very high Specific heat Capacity (read the article) as it takes 4200J to heat 1-litre of water 1-degree centigrade. (J = Joule).

    Almost a year ago I mentioned Fluorinert FC-40 which has a boiling point of 155C, and pour point (freezing) of -57C, make it an ideal thermal transfer liquid. However, a liquid with such malleable thermal properties, and dialectric properties (safe for submergence of electrically conductive materials), doesn't necessarily mean it's latent heat properties are appropriate. Since were NOT discussing phase change this may not be problematic, but can we find a liquid with the bonding properties of H20, with better latent heat, and safe for common waterpumps?

    Could we use charged water?
    Actually specific heat capacity you mentioned is per gram. Water's heat capacity is nothing short of extraordinary given its other properties. Theres really nothing that can beat it on performance. Let alone beat it on performance, toxcity and cost.

    As for electrically chargeing water, that won't really do anything. The molecules themselves are covelent so they don't really have any charge to them, except the vanderwaal forces induced by the exposed protons on the H atoms.

  8. #8
    Xtreme X.I.P. MaxxxRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, Ca USA
    Posts
    12,551
    vanderwall.. I remember that from HS chem class.... lol.

    But to beat a dead horse, water is the best thing that we can get our hands on that is safe. Like nick said NASA prolly does have something better but dont those cunning chaps always have something up their sleeves.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Connecticut (woodchipper State)
    Posts
    1,391
    Quote Originally Posted by saratoga
    Actually specific heat capacity you mentioned is per gram. Water's heat capacity is nothing short of extraordinary given its other properties. Theres really nothing that can beat it on performance. Let alone beat it on performance, toxcity and cost.

    As for electrically chargeing water, that won't really do anything. The molecules themselves are covelent so they don't really have any charge to them, except the vanderwaal forces induced by the exposed protons on the H atoms.

    Actually 1 calorie = 4.186 Joules 4-Joules is the amount of energy needed to heat one gram of water by 1C.

    I said 4200-Joules (4200J) is the amount of energy required to heat 1-litre of water by 1C.
    Last edited by Liquid3D; 11-29-2004 at 12:00 AM.
    Q6600 (8x401FSB 1.28Vcore)
    2x FX-74
    Gigabyte P35C-DS3R
    Asus L1N64-SLI
    Corsair DDR3-1800 2GB
    Geil DDR2-800 4x1GB
    BFG 8800Ultra
    Leadtek 7950GX2 DD GX2
    Tuniq 1200W
    NZXT 1200W
    Storm WB 775
    2x Swiftech Microdrive Socket-L

  10. #10
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    fluidXP ?
    ---

  11. #11
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson, Az, USA
    Posts
    978
    Quote Originally Posted by Liquid3D
    Actually 1 calorie = 4.186 Joules 4-Joules is the amount of energy needed to heat one gram of water by 1C.

    I said 4200-Joules (4200J) is the amount of energy required to heat 1-litre of water by 1C.
    Sorry, I misread. You were correct.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Gorssel, The Netherlands
    Posts
    328
    what about using some kind of very good heat conducting gass? Or does that not exist?


    C2D E6300 @ 3.5ghz | 2x1GB ADATA "Micron D9" @ 500 4-4-4-12 2.3v | Asus P5B-E Plus C2 | Sapphire X1900XT 512MB | Tuniq Tower 120

  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    452
    Gases will never conduct heat as well as a liquid, the molecules are 2 far apart and so do not transfer heat as effectilvy as liquid or solid

    Thats why Watercooling is a step up from Air cooling

  14. #14
    Xtreme X.I.P. MaxxxRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, Ca USA
    Posts
    12,551
    hehe... the basics of watercooling right there...

  15. #15
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cleveland OH USA Bored?: You Know It
    Posts
    2,892
    i thought denatured alcohol was the best, maybe im wrong, i know it has excellent heat condudting properties but not very viscous

  16. #16
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Tucson, Az, USA
    Posts
    978
    Quote Originally Posted by Disposibleteen
    i thought denatured alcohol was the best, maybe im wrong, i know it has excellent heat condudting properties but not very viscous
    Alcohol is very similar chemically to water. Thats why they both dissolve each other, why they have simlilar boiling points, why types won't kill you. Theres not a lot of difference between them, so I doubt you'd notice. Water is probably a little bit better though since it has 1.5x the heat capacity IIRC.

  17. #17
    Evil Kitty
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    3,305
    For our purposes water is generally considered the best. Add a touch of water wetter for lubrication and anti life properties and your all set. Any other fluid isn't worth the hassle.
    9900k @ 5.1Ghz
    Asus Maximus Hero XI
    32GB (8 x 4) Gskill @4000
    Strix 2080 Ti OC
    OS & Apps: Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
    Games: Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
    Storage: Crucial M500 2TB
    Seasonic Platinum 1000W
    Phanteks Evolv X

  18. #18
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cleveland OH USA Bored?: You Know It
    Posts
    2,892
    does water wetter add to the conductivity of the water? ( im a newb to water cooling and im worried about spills) i know that pure distilled water will not conduct electricity but do i need to seal my motherboard with anything, and if so what??

  19. #19
    Xtreme X.I.P. MaxxxRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, Ca USA
    Posts
    12,551
    water wetter makes the water much more conductive. Water wetter by itself is about 10 time more conductive than water. My number is not exact, but its really a big difference.

    Seal your motherboard? unless your running a pelt then there will be no condensation and you wont have to seal it. Just make sure ur water cooling doesnt leak...

  20. #20
    Evil Kitty
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    3,305
    Conductivity of the coolant is 100% irrelevant. Even if you begin with distilled water, the minute it is introduced into the cooling system, it picks up conductivity through contact with all the metals within the system.

    The only reason to use water wetter is that it adds lubrication (for the pump and seals) and anti life properties. It adds ZERO cooling capability. Many folks beleive that the improved cooling that comes with adding water wetter in automotive applications is the same in our computer systems...but its not even close. All water wetter does is relieve water tension. And water tension causes micro boil points within the cooling system in auto applications. But, since your computer system never gets hot enough, micro boiling points are not an issue, and therefore, WW does nothing to aid cooling.

    Just fyi.
    9900k @ 5.1Ghz
    Asus Maximus Hero XI
    32GB (8 x 4) Gskill @4000
    Strix 2080 Ti OC
    OS & Apps: Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
    Games: Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
    Storage: Crucial M500 2TB
    Seasonic Platinum 1000W
    Phanteks Evolv X

  21. #21
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cleveland OH USA Bored?: You Know It
    Posts
    2,892
    ok but it will extend the life of my pumps and will prevent algea right??

  22. #22
    Evil Kitty
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Detroit, MI
    Posts
    3,305
    Yes. And it doesn't reduce the thermal cooling properties of water as much as anti freeze does.

    Your best coolant solution:

    90% distilled water (provides best thermal properties)
    5% water wetter (lubrication, anti life, improved viscosity)
    5% automotive grade anti freeze (anti life, anti corrossion)

    I've tested probably over 20 different mixes of various coolants, and the above worked just as good as, if not better than, anything else.
    9900k @ 5.1Ghz
    Asus Maximus Hero XI
    32GB (8 x 4) Gskill @4000
    Strix 2080 Ti OC
    OS & Apps: Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
    Games: Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
    Storage: Crucial M500 2TB
    Seasonic Platinum 1000W
    Phanteks Evolv X

  23. #23
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cleveland OH USA Bored?: You Know It
    Posts
    2,892
    ok thanks, i have all of the parts for my first setup in the mail so right now im just trying to learn the ways, thanks for all of your help guys!

  24. #24
    Xtreme X.I.P. MaxxxRacer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, Ca USA
    Posts
    12,551
    i have found that zerex works extremely well. From some tests done it doesnt hurt temps as much as ww does.. But all the water additives hurt temps... but not by much...

  25. #25
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Cleveland OH USA Bored?: You Know It
    Posts
    2,892
    gotcha, gotta find the right mix for performance and functionality...

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •