KHX3200ULK2/512![]()
tested by my friend Bessie @ overclockerindo
BUS : Timing
200 : 2-2-2-5
220 : 2-2-2-5
230 : 2-3-2-6
240 : 2-3-3-6
250 : 2-3-3-6
260 : 2-3-3-6
270 : 2.5-3-3-8
280 : 2.5-3-3-8
290 : 2.5-4-3-10
300 : 2.5-4-3-10
![]()
KHX3200ULK2/512![]()
tested by my friend Bessie @ overclockerindo
BUS : Timing
200 : 2-2-2-5
220 : 2-2-2-5
230 : 2-3-2-6
240 : 2-3-3-6
250 : 2-3-3-6
260 : 2-3-3-6
270 : 2.5-3-3-8
280 : 2.5-3-3-8
290 : 2.5-4-3-10
300 : 2.5-4-3-10
![]()
sorry no cheksum on his screenshot
full review here:
http://www.overclockerindo.com/modul...wcontent&id=52
Trc = 17any looser?
![]()
---
ya trc 17 there![]()
nice review and resultBut 2.5-4-4-8 is not quite fast @DDR310.
Works 2.5-3-3-7 1T? That would give the ram around 100MB extra bandwidth.
Is that new revision TCCD?
268 1:1 268 2.9V 2.5-3-3-6-1T
300 1:1 300 3.2V 2.5-4-4-8-1T
It seems it like high Vdimm.
Here a screen from my Gskill 512MB SC 2.7v
![]()
wow nice timing you got there...![]()
ya he only manage to do that... 2.5-4-4-11 @ 3.2V vdimm
btw its review product... maybe he didnt push it to much...![]()
from 200-300MHz ... all tested are done at 2.9V if i stil rememberOriginally Posted by kakaroto
3.2V only at 310MHz...![]()
Must be the new revision modified chips then.Originally Posted by tictac
![]()
My TCCD does not like voltages above 2.8v.
wow impressive for KHX
ASUS P5K-E // E8400 Q746A519
G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ
LC 550W GP// XPERTVISION 9600GT
wow! very nice testing! thx a lot!
but why does he hide the checksum?
i'm not sure either... not enough space on desktop maybe.... anyway the KHX is gone... send back to distrbutor.... no new screenshot coming![]()
ya hope so.. they are selling at USD160 hereOriginally Posted by kakaroto
![]()
OK I'm kinda stupid so can you tell me where on the CPUZ is the checksum and why is it needed for proof.
Sorry for the OT highjack.
Thanks
TT
LanParty NF3 250GB (9/12)
3000+ Newcastle (CG)
(2x256) PQI Turbo 288x8, 10,3,3,2.5, 2.9v
Sapphire 9800pro 428/378
WDC WD800JB
Fortron FSP530-60GNA
even if u didnt know that the checksum was there, wouldnt u just include the whole CPU-Z screen anyways????
it just seems like the only time u would cut it off, is on purpose
just sayin its really odd, that that happens so much
can you see the light? is it shining too bright? can you see the light at the end of the tunnel, i know i do, i know its true.
is that the little no. at the bottom left of every tab?
tictac do you know which setting got the highest scores? (not buffered bandwidth) 3dmarks etc.
yeah it is the little number on the left at CPU-z screenies..
Only some people can calcultae this No... the one who got the tools & source code...
without that checksum .... most of them will think it is foto chop then...![]()
Not neccesarily so. Have some faith in humanity will ya. LOLOriginally Posted by blinky
When I take a cpu-z ram window and prime/sandra window, I normally exclude the bottom 20% of the cpu-z just to make the file smaller.![]()
How is your TCCD arj...![]()
The GSkill are kinda sucky, can't don anything stable near it's rated speed of PC4400 2.5-3-3-7 no matter how much vdimm I pump.Originally Posted by tictac
![]()
Youre not the first one to sat that about the Gskill PC4400. Whats up with Gskill?Originally Posted by arj
Shipping modules that cant reach rated speed is NOT good. Shame on you Gskill.
How is KHX doing with 2 dimms?
1dimm is easy...
Ya... 1 dimm is useless unless you're running a 1GB stick on S754 mobo
lol... KHX3200ULK2/512 on this review is 2 stick of 256MB versionOriginally Posted by kakaroto
so its two Dimm 512MB there
Bookmarks