MMM
Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Is A64 0432 v0.6/v2.6 Strained Silicon?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    n^n!
    Posts
    478

    Is A64 0432 v0.6/v2.6 Strained Silicon?

    After seeing Dagalidis results with his NC 0432 v0.6 and my own CH 0432 v2.6, then perhaps Strained Silicon is really being used on non WC CPUs.

    I think, that if the CPU is 0432 and v?.6, then no matter the if it a CH, NC, or WC, then SS has been used.

    It is a wildshot, but others has suggested it as well and why not make a thread, so it can be made certain if this is true or not. I think, SS and 13nm is a perfect combo, if it really being used

    Either, some of us has been lucky with our 0432 v?.6(if that is even related) or SS has and is being used in all 0432 CPUs.

    If it is the later, then it is obvious how it could affect a future purchase.

    So if people would be kind to get Central Brain Identifier or other program that can read the version, then read your number and report the results with your CPU. Also include as many details as possible like cooling etc.

    I go first:

    3700+ 0432 v2.6

    Can crunch M32 at v1.69(1.5x1.13) 12x250.82mhz / 3009.78mhz 3xHTT(PR 4600+). Best stable-enough-for-screenshot-without-failure at 3.2ghz

    I use LS for cooling.
    Last edited by Tek; 10-30-2004 at 02:55 PM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    US, Virginia
    Posts
    1,513
    What is strained silicon and what does it mean to me, as in... like what does is improve? Sorry if thats a noobish question
    E8400 @ 3600mhz
    4870 @ 790/1100
    2x2GB DDR2

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    174
    AMD announced that they used "localized" strained silicon on the FX-55 to allow it to run at 2.6 Gig. by default. There are several types of strained silicon but the use of this material is to reduce electrical leakage thus allowing higher CPU speeds and sometimes lower power consumption. The speculation is that AMD may have used it on earlier versions beginning with week 32 of 2004, not just in the FX-55, because some of these chips O/C well.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    US, Virginia
    Posts
    1,513
    So you mean chips after week 32 are speculated to use this? And what about the 90nm?
    E8400 @ 3600mhz
    4870 @ 790/1100
    2x2GB DDR2

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    397
    Everyone with week 30+ AMD64 CPU please tell us your week, full stepping code and run Central Brain Identifier and tell us the version with CBI reports and post screen.
    And your OC

    Would be nice if SS was used on all week 32+ CPU
    AMD Athlon 64 3200+ NewCastle @ 240 x 10 = 2400 MHz @ 1.550 V
    MSI K8N Neo Platinum 1.52 Beta BIOS
    2x 512 MB DDR500 A-DATA Vitesta Hynix @ 240 MHz 1:1 2.5-3-3-7 1T 2.85V 24/7
    Sapphire Radeon 9800 Pro R350
    Enermax EG365AX-VE FMA 3.3V@32A 5V@32A 12V@26A
    DVD-RW TEAC
    Seagate 200 GB SATA + Maxtor 300 GB SATA

  6. #6
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    AMD64 3700+ CAAXC 0434RPAW

    ---

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    happy place
    Posts
    2,337
    hmm, strained silicon is what intel used for the prescott. interesting to hear that AMD is gonna use the same process.
    --===== proud owner of new razor tarantula gaming keyboard =====--

  8. #8
    XS D2OL & RAM News
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Somewhere, USA
    Posts
    3,589
    Intel's different from AMD's. Intel's "their own creation" while AMD had help from IBM I believe. IBM had a different approach to SS. When its used onthe whole die heat goes up, but if its used only on part of the die or the section that needs it to achieve a certain speed it doesn't cause such a high amount of heat. AMD's is more effient and more thought out than Intel's in my opion.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    n^n!
    Posts
    478
    My own CDI, exactly the same CPU as Eva2000:

    32M stable - 12 x 250mhz / 3ghz - 250mhz HTT x 4 / 1ghz HTL
    Last edited by Tek; 10-30-2004 at 07:56 PM.

  10. #10
    X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    774
    my week 33 FX53 is a V2.6 chip and overclocks very nicely. Not quite as good as the FX55, but good enough for me. 2.7 on air and 3.2 in a 507 modded Mach I.

    Dunno if this is due to strained silicon or just overall improvements in the 0.13um process.
    Either way it just means better overclocks for us all
    X800Pro class 3DMark01 : 36670
    X800Pro class 3DMark03 : 16092
    Ti4200 class 3Dmark01 No 1 : 22213
    Super Pi 1M : S754 28 sec, FX53 25 sec
    HEXUS Pifast : S754/Prom 40.55sec, FX53 36.92sec

    Author of A64 Tweaker
    Co-author of NF2 Tweaker

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    ICELAND!
    Posts
    188
    Here is my FX-53, its a 0425, I have sucky mobo and cant overclock it any :|
    I will get though MSI K8N and FX-55 soon
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cpu.JPG 
Views:	178 
Size:	53.6 KB 
ID:	18642  
    Ísland best :banana: heimi!

  12. #12
    X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    774
    Quote Originally Posted by Arnar
    Here is my FX-53, its a 0425, I have sucky mobo and cant overclock it any :|
    I will get though MSI K8N and FX-55 soon
    thats the same as mine except for the production week
    X800Pro class 3DMark01 : 36670
    X800Pro class 3DMark03 : 16092
    Ti4200 class 3Dmark01 No 1 : 22213
    Super Pi 1M : S754 28 sec, FX53 25 sec
    HEXUS Pifast : S754/Prom 40.55sec, FX53 36.92sec

    Author of A64 Tweaker
    Co-author of NF2 Tweaker

  13. #13
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    505
    I am not sure the week number of my 3400+ CG Clawhammer but I do know that its only version 2.5 reported by CBID...its prolly not week 32 or later.
    I get about 2.5ghz on 1.7v air cooled so far....not too bad, but not spectacular like some of these SS chips.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •