post your wichester oc results

[saaya]

heard great results so far. 2.6-2.7ghz with stock coolers seems to be a common thing, thats 100-300mhz better than the average 130nm nc and ch's oc afaik.

please post your results!

[saaya]

whats wrong?

anybody?

[avicenna]

Maybe it´s because you wrote Wichester, i don´t think anybody has any of those

Seriously though, likely there aren´t so many out yet.

I am curious also though, if you got one by all means let us know your results.

[=[PULSAR]=]

Saaya dont know much about them are they the new 939 core?

[Overlag]

Saaya dont know much about them are they the new 939 core?

3200 90nm

tops out at 2200 so far.....cant get it any further?

[Poki]

Mine is a week 35 3200+. Top stable clocks so far 2300MHz w/default voltage and 2550MHz w/1.60v. I'm using a maze3 WB with a little giant 475gph pump and fullsize auto radiator.
The temps i'm getting aren't all that great, at max clock it gets upto 55c.
I did remove the IHS but had poor contact (maze3 WB's are big) so i lapped the IHS and applied AS5 to the core.
The IHS was indeed very concaved on mine so a lapping should show an improvment for most anyone.
All i have ATM is BH-5 and this thing hates it!
I'm going to order some TCCD today and i have the feeling it should help me out. I'll update when i get my new ram.

[SAE]

Sascha, still wanting to get such a thing?

No stunning results yet... at least here I am looking forward to seeing all the newer A64 stuff getting cheaper... then I will be able to get me something similar after xmas

[saaya]

yeah i want one BAAAD

but then again, there are not many results yet...

[p4z1f1st]

i asked @ lowestonweb.com but they don't ship to germany

ARGH - 3000+ 60 in stock / 3200+ 176 in stock!!!!!!

I WANT THAT SH*T!!!!

[Onepagebook]

As your request, Saaya

[ocmyface]

sigh... me wants so bad...

[shigs]

As your request, Saaya

is that stable mate? we all need to see sum stable overclocks.....?? a few hours of prime at least

[SAE]

Yep... too bad I've no money...

[Onepagebook]

[QUOTE=shigs]

As your request, Saaya

is that stable mate? we all need to see sum stable overclocks.....?? a few hours of prime at least

I hate and don't believe prime 95.

[shigs]

I hate and don't believe prime 95.

lmao fair enough

[p4z1f1st]

I hate and don't believe prime 95.

the first test is good for CPU-stress-testing only....the rest is f*cked up sh*t

[PnoT]

I've got an MSI Neo2 plat on the way and a 3000+ Winchester as well i'll post up once i get it in.

[perkam]

One page book,

1. what cooling are you using and if it is TCCD or Phase Change, what can you get out of it on stock heatsink

2. What differences did you find between the 130nm and the 90nm, assuming you tried them both?

3. I saw it get its $#% kicked at MadShrimps by a 3200+ 90nm at 2.5 Stock (not a joke, link below)

http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=getarticle&articID=230

What do you say to that?

Extremely Curious about your 3500+ Winchester results - Perkam

[saaya]

perkam, it doesnt get its a** kicked , geez, calm down dude. it just shows that the 90nm parts are slightly faster than the 130nm parts, and yes id also like to hear what results you got with both chips kevin

do the 90nm parts scale better and the speed increases even more compared to their 130nm brothers when you oc them to 3ghz? do you have a 130nm score@3ghz you could run again with the same setup now but with a 90nm cpu at 3ghz and see how big the difference is? and it looks like the 90nm parts give memory bandiwth a boost as well!

thx for posting all your results, especially you kevin

[misteroadster]

I hate and don't believe prime 95.

K8N neo hate Prime too

[PnoT]

K8N neo hate Prime too

Great, i have one on order

[Poki]

I switched out the BH-5 for OCZ3200 plat rev2. (3200+) 260x10 stable is in the bag now... I think i could bench higher but i'll wait a while and switch to a TDX WB and remove the IHS once again.