jesus, thats insane.
5.2 ghz done on a 3dmark run.
all I can say is, I wanna see it in 3dmark2001se now
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=117181
Shamino-Any Pics?
jesus, thats insane.
5.2 ghz done on a 3dmark run.
all I can say is, I wanna see it in 3dmark2001se now
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=117181
Shamino-Any Pics?
nice shamino!
what temps?
insane
congrats guys
Athlon XP-M 2500+@2701.4mhz 12.5x216.1
NF7-S rev 2.0 D26 Manta Rays XT BIOS
2x256 TwinMos Winbond CH5 2-3-3-11
Sparkle 6800NU softmodded to 16x1&6vp
Watercooling by Aqua Computer,1A, Alphacool & HPPS 12V
hehe, but he didn't run the CPU-Tests
----- AMD K6-2 300 "Chomper" xxxxx xxxx xxxx /// 300 MHz @ 2,200 V -----
----- AMD Athlon XP 1700+ "Thouroghbred B" JIUHB 0306 MPMW /// 2400 MHz @ 1,900 V -----
----- AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ "Barton" AQXEA 0327 UPMW /// 2450 MHz @ 1,850 V -----
----- AMD Athlon XP-M 2600+ "Barton" IQYHA 0401 XPMW /// 2500 MHz @ 1,750 V -----
----- AMD Athlon 64 3000+ "Newcastle CG" xxxxx 0418 WPMW /// 2600 MHz @ 1,600 V -----
----- AMD Athlon 64 3200+ "Winchester D0" xxxxx 0433 SPMW /// 2750 MHz @ 1,616 V -----
----- AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE "Callisto" xxxxx xxxx xxxx /// 4080MHz @ 1,375 V -----
----- AMD Ryzen "Zen" xxxxx xxxx xxxx /// TBA @ TBA -----
daymmm, and only on a -88c cascade
lol, only? what am i saying
and it looks like either this test is very GPU dependant, or it hates intel, im surprised that didnt get the top spot
can you see the light? is it shining too bright? can you see the light at the end of the tunnel, i know i do, i know its true.
he doesnt have the 800MHz core that Macci does but thats a nice score for his gpu clocks and Intel may be slightly faster in 2005 like its in 2003. I say he should easily hit like 36k in 2001, anyone agree?
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
Heh sacrificed another night's sleep for this, but took the lead for now with P4 5.2 gig on the dual cascade:
CPU @ -88C GPU @ -90C NB @ -50C
16 x 326 -> 5219Mhz on Abit AS8 Sapphire X800 pro still alive and kickin after the LN2 torture doing 788/652
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=117181
The NB cooling is just for show though
If possible though I would love to have a stock VGA clocks compare with the top AMD to see who is actually the stronger CPU.
Last edited by LardArse; 10-05-2004 at 01:28 PM.
Great run LardArse
These LGA775 are getting better and better OC'ers, but they need more Level 2 cache (not just 1MB) to be competitive in 3Dmark 2001 - maybe the new 6XXX series (2MB L2 cache) will chance the scenario ..
Ei TI4200 I just love your predictions (reminds me J.C. Dvorak predictions ) , what you predict for our 3Dmark 2005 with FX53@3400 and the X800XT let's say at 750/680 ?
Last edited by Pedro Rocha; 10-05-2004 at 01:33 PM.
hehe congrats amazing work there
Athlon XP-M 2500+@2701.4mhz 12.5x216.1
NF7-S rev 2.0 D26 Manta Rays XT BIOS
2x256 TwinMos Winbond CH5 2-3-3-11
Sparkle 6800NU softmodded to 16x1&6vp
Watercooling by Aqua Computer,1A, Alphacool & HPPS 12V
wow intel at the top. nice job
5.2ghz through 3dmark :drool: awesome clocks man
:more drool: show us Pedrowhat you predict for our 3Dmark 2005 with FX53@3400 and the X800XT let's say at 750/680 ?
Benchmarks always favor one side not on purpose but it just happens such as ATi for GPU and Intel as CPU. I'm looking at a old magazine artical with P4 3.4EE on the 925 and 875 chipset and the a FX-53. Here is the breakdown.
3.4GHz P4EE/925X 3.4GHz P4EE/875P Athlon 64 FX-53
3DMark03 17653 17428 17028
Splinter Cell 76.7 78.2 92.4
Comanche 4 73.5 74.6 78.1
UT2003 Botmatch 72.3 73.6 90.2
Now as you can see the Intel does get the extra points in 3dmark, but look at the difference in real world performance where FX-53 kicks intels butt. I wish that 3dmark's benchmark were a real world performance test. Like have actual games in there benchmarks like DOOM3, FarCry, UT2k4 anyone agree?
We can arrange that I can do one run of 3Dmark 2005 with FX53@3.400Mhz and Graphics Card a stock speed, to do compare ..seems interestingOriginally Posted by LardArse
Excellent score !
Looks like a very good Canyon score, is that where the Intel 5GHz helped ? You are about equal with macci on the other 2 tests.
Regards
Andy
Insane clocks
Congrats
It would be nice to see stock speed on graphics and thenOriginally Posted by Pedro Rocha
3000, 3100, 3200, 3300 for FX53
4600, 4800, 5000, 5200 for Intel
to see cross over points (if there is one ).
Might be nice for 03 as well, if everyone has lots of time on their hands ( as if ! ).
Regards
Andy
Last edited by zakelwe; 10-05-2004 at 10:57 PM.
"only" -88C shamino? wasnt it running with lower temps before?
"what you predict for our 3Dmark 2005 with FX53@3400 and the X800XT let's say at 750/680 ?"
I recon about 8200 marks, 8500 easy if you can get the gpu to 800MHz core, I think Ricky mentioned it was capable of that with a mod to the OVP to increase the volts even more
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
id imagine a prescott @ 5.2ghz gives off quite a considerable amount of heatOriginally Posted by saaya
and im still curious to see how important CPU is in this bench, because macci did have the top score with "only" a 2.93ghz FX53
can you see the light? is it shining too bright? can you see the light at the end of the tunnel, i know i do, i know its true.
Go do that Pedro.. then we look at the scores
Well I'd say the precott runs hotter and perhaps I put in a lil too much R290 this time
Unreal again, I also see where Opp did his 05 run at 4.9Ghz.
Intel 9990XE @ 5.1Ghz
ASUS Rampage VI Extreme Omega
GTX 2080 ti Galax Hall of Fame
64GB Galax Hall of Fame
Intel Optane
Platimax 1245W
Intel 3175X
Asus Dominus Extreme
GRX 1080ti Galax Hall of Fame
96GB Patriot Steel
Intel Optane 900P RAID
Congrats Shamino , insane speed man 5.2GHZ
Now i´m starting to understand why gurus have greats scores , like Ricky and Pedro the was an hardware Box , under the mobo . It´s not a Mx440 but it kicks ass
And The x800 still working
Great Work
asus P4P800Originally Posted by |-jokker-|
can you see the light? is it shining too bright? can you see the light at the end of the tunnel, i know i do, i know its true.
wow, thats awesome Lardarse. going head to head with one of the worlds best bencher/overclocker(Macci). i think 10k will break a lot faster in '05 than in 3dmark03.
--===== proud owner of new razor tarantula gaming keyboard =====--
Bookmarks