5129MHz in air????

[cpulloverclock]

I think it's in air + ln2

[hallowen]

Alright Guys!

I Sent an Email to this Website as follows:

Quote:

Gentlemen: Could you Please give me more Information on Whether or Not This Is A TRUE High Score on Air Or Just A FAKE!

I , And my Members at Xtremesystems.org have a HARD Time Believing That This Score is Accurate.

Thank You For your Reply In Advance.

Sincerely,

hallowen@attbi.com

Unquote:

Here is the Email I Received From Yokoigawa at the Website in responce to the Overclock Score!

Quote:

Thank you for your e-mail.
5129.2MHz is wonderful Score!
Of course,it is true.
I think.E0-Stepping is good.
He live inTaiwan,and he got E0-Stepping Mobile P4 3.46GHz Engineering sample.
I want to get E0-Stepping P4 ,too.

Sincerely,

tanuki

Unquote:

I Have No Reason to Doubt that he is not Telling the Truth, since I asked The Administrator of this Website Directly!

[bigjohns97]

nm

[lupacchiotto]

For me is possible the score...but not only with air cooling!
With ln2 yessss........

It's a fantastic score...no only wonderful...
But the name of the clocker??

[cpulloverclock]

mizuhiro

[hallowen]

458MHz RAM FREQUENCY!

Here is an Email I Just Received from EC Chen who did the 5128MHz High OC on Air:

Quote:

Dear Sir:

This is my original capture_screen of Mobile P4 3.46G overclock upto 5129MHz for your reference. (attached)

The environments is IC7 M/B with Bios Ver 25. The Mobile P4 still cannot booted smoothly with this board. It only bootup smoothly every ones after clear CMOS. After power off I have to clear CMOS once again to let it bootup. I cannot change/save anything in the BIOS cs it will hangup. So the only OC method is using SetFSB(SetFSB for P4c800 also for IC7).

The Vcore reading in the BIOS is 1.150V. while CPU_Z is 1.120V.

Room tempture was around 30C.

Mobile P4(Prescott core) has double L1 latency time(8cycles/u16KB) of Normal P4 Prescott(4cycles/u16KB). So it can Overclock higher, even by normal air cooling.

Do not expect it too much because the performance(@5128)almost like a normal P4_prescott3.4G.

I have tried to go higherFSB by changing CPU/Memeory ratio to 1:1, but BIOS can not saved. I think the CPU still have head room.

If you have any Q please don't hestate to ask me.

EC

Unquote:



EDIT: Sorry, having trouble trying to Load Pic....

[Kunaak]

Originally posted by hallowen
458MHz RAM FREQUENCY!:slob

Do not expect it too much because the performance(@5128)almost like a normal P4_prescott3.4G.

this is what I was talking about.
AJM had this same problem.
he "thought" he installed windows at 4.6 ghz, but kept doing tons of benchmarks to prove it, and they were only doing like 8,000 mips and bandwidth of like 4,000
among other things.

I forget how they concluded this, but the guys had a 10 page long post about what happens when you put mobile CPUs in P4 motherboards.

you have no control over the multiplier, so it defaults to it's lowest available multiplier, but windows reads the highest multiplier.

[Nanobot]

Guys these ppl are full of it !

Mobile Prescott are not properly detected by most apps and BIOS

My ES Mobile 3.06 533Mhz with HT only gets it's proper clock detected with Clockgen.

Here's screenie to prove it;





Dont fall for these fool's hoax,these CPU are faster than their desktop counterparts but not THAT fast.

[Kunaak]

THANK YOU

[hallowen]

Originally posted by Kunaak
THANK YOU

Thanks from Me Also!

I Thought There was Something Wrong, But I didn't Know What.

Guess You Just Can't Trust Everyone!

[pik-ard v1.1]

so how high can they REALLY go?

[Nanobot]

Lol,your all welcome.

ROFL IMAO I just see ppl rushing to the comp stores to buy Mobiles by the crate full.

BTW:I'm at 245FSB 1/1 multi x14 locked

It scores the same 3dmark and SuperPi times as my 3.0SL6WU@3.85GHZ !

[Kunaak]

Originally posted by Nanobot

BTW:I'm at 245FSB 1/1 multi x14 locked

yep, thats what I been saying...

windows reads the highest available multiplier, but it defaults to it's lowest available multiplier and you have no control over that...
I almost bought a 3.06 ES too till I saw that hardocp guys all getting locked with the 14 multiplier.

[pik-ard v1.1]

Originally posted by Nanobot

BTW:I'm at 245FSB 1/1 multi x14 locked

It scores the same 3dmark and SuperPi times as my 3.0SL6WU@3.85GHZ !

woah woah... at 3.43ghz... its scoring the same as a p4c at 3.85ghz?

[craig588]

with my P4C at 3.8GHz it was doing 35 seconds in superpi.

[Nanobot]

Originally posted by pik-ard v1.1
woah woah... at 3.43ghz... its scoring the same as a p4c at 3.85ghz?

Yep ,mobile cores are more efficient since they usually come from the centre of the wafer where the better yeilds are.

Clock for clock mobile chips will beat a desktop one on average.

If someone could make a 100million trasistor CPU with every single gate that works it could be run at 100Mhz of total ownage, every single destop processor would be left in the dust.
That's the theory at least...

[pik-ard v1.1]

100mhz? :P

but still... making up for a 400mhz+ defficit? if its the same core, that seems a bit much

EDIT: oh wait nvm, its doing 38seconds at 3.4ghz, whereas his 3.85 was doing 35seconds...

[cpulloverclock]

ok, it's a bug

too bad

[cpulloverclock]

I get 33s at 3780MHz with a 3.0E

[OC_Newbee]

Originally posted by craig588
with my P4C at 3.8GHz it was doing 35 seconds in superpi.

Mine in sig do 35s as well.

[blinky]

so......... he claims it performs bad because the latencies are doubled making it easier to clock, but in reality the desktop mobo with mobile cpu combo is making his multi read wrong

someone email him to get clockgen and see what it says

[Reflex1]

ROLF ...either he knows and he's faking it, or he's pure dumb blaming latencys.

someone confront him

[HawainPanda]

oh yeah, i remember this was brought up some time ago, someone should def tell them