MMM
Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Computex 2019 - AMD teased new Ryzens 3. gen (launch 7.7.2019)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by vario View Post
    Well, amd showed some game numbers vs 2700x.
    So , i took those percentage gains, and applied them to 2700X scores in the same games vs intel counterparts.
    It seems ryzen 3000 will get around 8600K/8700K performance. So, good.But still worse than the 9700/9900K.
    Which was not that surprising, if they would stomp intel in games, they would show that .They lack the gigahurtzes for that
    Still, im getting back into the warm and fuzzy amd fold this year with a 3900X or a new threadripper if they release it.Its gonna be a solid upgrade from 5960x.
    There's a massive amount of L3 cache on these chips. I would wait to see how the overclocking tests look - there's a good chance the gaming performance will be very competitive.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    687
    Quote Originally Posted by AliG View Post
    There's a massive amount of L3 cache on these chips. I would wait to see how the overclocking tests look - there's a good chance the gaming performance will be very competitive.
    You have to remember, they dont have 32MB L3, they have 2x16MB L3, and thats not the same, CCX`s are still 4 core ones, whenever a thread migrates from a core on CCX 1 to a core on CCX 2 l3 has to be filled again.
    But yes, they are 2x bigger.But you have to understand that they are not having better latency, and thats why intels are fast(well that and clocks)
    Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
    Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB

  3. #3
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ace Deuce, Michigan
    Posts
    3,955
    Quote Originally Posted by vario View Post
    You have to remember, they dont have 32MB L3, they have 2x16MB L3, and thats not the same, CCX`s are still 4 core ones, whenever a thread migrates from a core on CCX 1 to a core on CCX 2 l3 has to be filled again.
    But yes, they are 2x bigger.But you have to understand that they are not having better latency, and thats why intels are fast(well that and clocks)
    Gotta remember games are 4 threads at most usually; I'll take a 30% improvement in cache in those cases (as compared to 12 Mb on 9700k). Yes, latency is slower than Intel. But in general the cost of cache misses is much higher than the read time. As long as the cache management is good I'll bet a notable portion of the IPC improvement came from double the size.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hans de Vries View Post

    JF-AMD posting: IPC increases!!!!!!! How many times did I tell you!!!

    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    terrace215 post: IPC decreases, The more I post the more it decreases.
    .....}
    until (interrupt by Movieman)


    Regards, Hans

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •