Opp used to get the newest/ best Kingston ram and ramp it up on Abit boards, another guy always used Asus boards...I used Corsair BH-5.
Maybe AMD IS BACK!:-P
Opp used to get the newest/ best Kingston ram and ramp it up on Abit boards, another guy always used Asus boards...I used Corsair BH-5.
Maybe AMD IS BACK!:-P
Zen2 Has brought AMD back!
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
tbone- It looks good, gonna be like old times hopefully.
Serious fun.
Zen2 Has brought AMD back!
Its pretty quiet and i dont know why AMD isnt fixing this, but the blender file on AMD website IS NOT THE ONE USED IN THE LIVE STREAM, its not comparable.People with 6900K are getting WAY worse results with the settings this file provides, so it cant be used to compare to zen :-/ .To get the score from the show 6950x (10 core broadwell-e) must be clocked at 4ghz!
I find it absolutely hilarious at this point. Amd s up pretty much the most important show in 2016... And its still on AMDs website and they welcome people to compare ...
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
I'm pretty sure the file provides correct render resolution of 800x800 pixels but it looks like for the sake of quicker comparision time they dumbed down on number of samples to a lower value.
At default settings my i7 4790K @4.4GHz needs 1m 19s to render RyZEN.
RiG1: Ryzen 7 1700 @4.0GHz 1.39V, Asus X370 Prime, G.Skill RipJaws 2x8GB 3200MHz CL14 Samsung B-die, TuL Vega 56 Stock, Samsung SS805 100GB SLC SDD (OS Drive) + 512GB Evo 850 SSD (2nd OS Drive) + 3TB Seagate + 1TB Seagate, BeQuiet PowerZone 1000W
RiG2: HTPC AMD A10-7850K APU, 2x8GB Kingstone HyperX 2400C12, AsRock FM2A88M Extreme4+, 128GB SSD + 640GB Samsung 7200, LG Blu-ray Recorder, Thermaltake BACH, Hiper 4M880 880W PSU
SmartPhone Samsung Galaxy S7 EDGE
XBONE paired with 55'' Samsung LED 3D TV
Yea, people are trying different values, but nothing really sticks. Fact is, amd, on their own site, after such important event, shared a test file and wanted people to compare.But the file has wrong settings and is not comparable, when someone does the test like it is, its showing WAY worse results than it should.It could be interpreted as a manipulation :/ .And after 2 days , no statement or fix.Its still there
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
At least for me, I easily trade 20% in render time for what my eye perceives as a 10% increase in image quality, and whether by IPC or SMP, it's nice to see AMD put up a good number -- even in a small slice of 'Blender render'. Without a comparison of engines and 'quality' it's always subjective.
I think the 'BIOS on Chip' could have a great upside, especially if you can manage in combination P-States and voltages -- even in AOD. And most AMD BIOSs these days can save 8 different profiles in a 'dual-BIOS' set-up.
The Monster AMD Tweaker will RyZEN especially with a quality ITX mobo and Vega kicker
On the Ryzen file from AMDs site during the live stream, I got 2:34 on my FX 9370, all stock settings. I heard there was a updated file?
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
Phenom II X6 1055T @ 3.8Ghz --> 1:47:10 (150 samples)
Antec Three Hundred + Basiq 550W Modular
Asrock 890GX Extreme3 bios 2.42B
1055T CCBBE CB 1013CPDW at 3800@1.4125V + Mugen 2 rev.B push/pull with GT 1850 + MX-3
G.Skill 4 GB DDR3-1600 F3-12800CL7D-4GBECO at 1806-7-9-7-24-1T, NB at 2710@1.2750V
MSI R5770-PMD1G 1GB at 945/1375
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB HD103SJ SATA2
Samsung Spinpoint T166 HD501LJ 500GB SATA2
Replaced case fans with Xilence Red Wings
there is thread with updated file from AMD (second link with 150 samples)
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...-benchmark****
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
This looks promising
Intel 5960X@4.2Ghz[Prime stable]@4.5 [XTU stable] 1.24v NB@3.6ghz Asrock X99 Extreme 3 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance@3200 16-17-17
Sapphire nitro+ VEGA 56 Samsung SSD 850 256GB Crucial MX100 512GB HDD:WD10TB WD:8TB Seagate8TB
More of this old review: https://imgur.com/a/qo9pH and https://imgur.com/a/KOXPd
PS:be sure, this is not the final sample (clocks, maybe revision also-its possible final silicon is A1)
Last edited by FlanK3r; 12-29-2016 at 01:52 AM.
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
My head will explode
I've tried to temper my enthusiasm for Zen/AM4 with the understanding that AMD has historically struggled with "shrinks" requiring re-spins -- typically gaining higher clocks at lower volts, while putting out a few big fires that held back performance.
If true, Son of Zen might be a real slobber-knocker
Do you dont know about the final silicon has now 3.4 GHz base clock (without turbo)? Its maybe 3 weeks confirmed. And its really possible, this final retails could be A1 and not A0 as the one from review. 3.15 GHz chips was aviable in summer...
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
3.6 ghz with 3.9 ghz turbo
wanna get one of these so we can have OC fun soon
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
When is retail availability? That's my question.
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
Sorry if old news, I haven't followed this stuff very close.
Zen to live on,
AMD says its Zen CPU architecture is expected to last four yearsWhen asked how long Zen would last, compared to Intel’s two-year tick-tock cadence, Papermaster confirmed the four-year lifespan and tapped the table in front of him: “We’re not going tick-tock,” he said. “Zen is going to be tock, tock, tock.”
PCWorld | JAN 6, 2017 11:09 AM PT
Last edited by ReKcOlNu; 01-08-2017 at 09:06 AM.
That's pretty new actually.
From the board previews at CES, it looks like most X370 boards will support DDR4-2666 "officially" with OC of up to at least DDR4-3000.
If RyZen is really competitive then aren't they going to be really expensive? I see some saying only $450 for 8C/16T, that seems way too cheap, remember these?...
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+
Introduction date May 31, 2005
Price at introduction $1001
AMD Athlon 64 FX FX-60
Introduction date Jan 10, 2006
Price at introduction $1031
Any clue on RyZen prices?
no clue for prices but i wouldn't expect AMD to price these to high this generation it would be suicide.
maybe something like this?
4c/8t to be <$299
8c/16t <$499
i bet zen+ will be higher priced once its been proven.
also Ryzen will be released on my birthday Feb 28th ok thanks Amd
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
k7 was really cheap given its performance. The 1.4 GHz Tbird was the fastest x86 CPU you could get for a long time (since the Pentium4 1.4, 1.6, and 1.8 chips were such failures), yet it was stupid-cheap. I think I got mine for under $200, more like $140? It was fairly long in the tooth by the time I got it and most of the boards comparatively sucked compared to what you could get on the Intel side, but still . . . AMD made it cheap to grab market share and establish rep.
On the flip side, Su has been pretty clear that they don't want to be the budget brand anymore.
I can see Summit Ridge/Ryzen costing more than Intel quads but less - far less - than Intel's HEDT lineup. $500 sounds about right for the Ryzen flagship chip.
So about a grand all in for CPU, quality MB and RAM? or to put it another way the same price for the whole platform as the competition is charging for a CPU
Asus is keeping its cards very close to it chest ref the AM4 platform. So far we have only had news on the B350 board, a bit infuriating.
Last edited by robbicfc; 01-11-2017 at 02:21 AM.
FX 8350 @ 4.92 | FX8320E @ 4.8 | Asus Sabretooth FX990 R3.0 | 16GB GSkill TridentX 1600Mhz @ 7-8-8-10 | AMD R9 290 | Samsung SM950 Pro 500GB | Toshiba X300 4TB | Be-Quiet! 650W P8 PSU | Dual DDCs | EX Supremacy | EK R9 GPU | RX360 | RX240
ryzen for my birthday!
GDC release time
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
Release date's 28 Feb
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero
Bookmarks