Is Maxwell for soon ? Yes and no - Hardware.fr

[tajoh111]

You just keep repeating the same misinformation (to put it nicely). I already told you GTX 780 series cards do not have any Uber mode that's why no other review site used Uber mode and the Hardware.fr did not run any 780s under clocked it would not make any sense.

Most of the reviews show table with all the specification if you would bother to check. I decided to ignore the 'boxleitnerb' post, so he kept forwarding it by himself. Was he looking for post counts or arguments? I had no time for that since it was kind personal anyway and best to ignore. So now you're helping him out. LOL

Anyway since you decided to ignore other reviews posted specs, maybe the specs directly from Nvidia might end up the argument. Just to remind you the R9 290 series cards compared are reference design.


Again directly from Nvidia the latest GTX 780 Ti

I used the link Olivion posted with this benchmarks (kind of strange to use selective benchmarks when there are 21 reviews in the OP) oops my bad, none had the GTX 780 in Uber mode LOL. Anyway from the same review page 13 Google translate, the Uber mode was MSI and ASUS custom built cards.


"show performance of such a model seems to be more interesting in this case."

Honestly, you keep on denying but don't you think you could be the one saying misinformation?


Cards usually boost at higher level than the noted specs in the gtx 780 reviews, or all reviews in general. Heinz don't play dumb we both know Nvidia cards will boost beyond their minimum boost. The clocks on the box of the card are never right and only represent the minimum to avoid any sort of lawsuit for false advertising.




http://www.anandtech.com/show/6973/n...-780-review/19

Anandtech average clock for the gtx 780 is around 990mhz while titans clocks are on average 980mhz.

Look at the above clocks for example and compare their titan clocks and gtx 780 clocks with Hardware.fr. Hardware.fr limits the boost of Nvidia cards to a minimum level. And they limit this in their settings. I have always questioned why their results were so low until Oblivon explained to me they set limits on the card so the boost is never allowed to go above 876 for titan for example. They have to mess with the settings to do this, so it is the same as underclocking the card because real performance will be higher. Its the sames as setting profile settings to a lower level that comes out of the box. Something analogous to this would be setting an AMD cards max fan profile to 38% or something. To get the clocks hardware.fr does, you have to mess with the settings in a manner that lower performance compared to stock.

In this case, they set boost limits to 50mhz which is what the product will do under the worst circumstances really.

Testing like this has hurt Nvidia cards in the past and hence undermines your argument that they are are pro-Nvidia website.

Look at every single gk110 review out there and you will see that in every single review, these cards boost beyond their 50mhz boost clock on the box.

Heres another review that shows this.



http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...on-review.html

Every single review out there has the cards in the reviews boosting to higher clocks than the minimum boost clocks.