The swiftech should be very low restriction, similar to the hydrocopper restriction data I took earlier in the thread. I'd expect it to be similar to the old GTX580 blocks, but because you had 2 in parallel vs one now therefore you should see restriction increase. However that sounds like a bigger change than I would expect, having said that, it does depend what else you have in your loop. I wonder if your swiftech block is running at much higher restriction like my sample is. I just took mine apart and I don't see anything wrong with it, but I'll send Gabe some photos to see if he can see anything wrong. If not I'll take the hydrocopper apart to compare.
I know those old bridges were much sexier, still I feel like they're on a upward trend in terms of style
EK SE (second edition) data:
The finer fins in the cooling engine did not alter the poorer performance at low flow. However I was able to get a better TIM spread and at very high flows the block now performs at the top alongside the XSPC:
This time I didn't apply TIM to the VRMs/VRAMs which may explain the slightly poorer performance. However the VRM section design did change.
Still to do:
- verify Koolance performance when you don't warp the card
- stick my new temperature probes to the back of the card to log VRM/VRAM temps more accurately
- run the EK SE vs flow (expected to be similar to the older EK block based on flow numbers)
Still waiting for
- Bitspower sample (Redesigning I think)
- Alphacool sample (OOS)
- Phobya sample (Not even sure if this is still happening)







Reply With Quote

Bookmarks