MMM
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 69

Thread: P4@3700 against XP 2600+ and 2800+ on Sandra 2003

  1. #1
    Xtreme Old School Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,660

    P4@3700 against XP 2600+ and 2800+ on Sandra 2003

    I know Sandra benchmarks are not to accurate but here is how my P42800@3700 compare against AMD XP 2600+ and 2800+ on the new Sandra 2003 benchies .

    AMD newcomers are not bad in CPU and Multimedia speed, but they really fall behind in Memory Speed - limitations on the VIA chipset..








    Here is the ID and temperatures of my CPU:




  2. #2
    Overclocking Guru
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    5,128
    Well here's my XP2400@2700,, 1000 less Mhz then your P4 and the CPU bench kicks your booty

    OPP

  3. #3
    Overclocking Guru
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    5,128
    Some MM bench at 2700Mhz

    OPP

  4. #4
    Overclocking Guru
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    5,128
    You got me on the mem bench though
    XP2400 @ 2722 Mhz

    OPP

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    186
    nice work OPP !
    Updating...

  6. #6
    Overclocking Guru
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    SoCal, USA
    Posts
    5,128
    Thanks NoOne

    Welcome to Xtreme

    OPP

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    OPP

    these are some nice sandra benches! i need to get Prommy ASAP and at least try to get closer to you, my man
    2600k @ 5.0Ghz 1.54V, Giga Z68, Zotac GTX680 AMP!, Patriot 1066Mhz 8GB RAM, Custom water, Silverstone 1000W, HAF932

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    186
    Thnks OPP
    Im Brasilian but i undestand english..
    My only problem is "type in english" hehehehe

    Updating...

  9. #9
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    3,289

    Smile

    Welcome to Xtreme, NoOne.

    Look around our forums. There's a lot of useful information.

    And feel free to join the Xtreme Folding@Home team.

    DDTUNG

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    dordrecht netherland
    Posts
    188
    with pc800 instead of pc1066 is already fine
    [

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    hehe, nice too bad i can't find my sandra piccie of P4/DDR running at 243fsb well beating your rambus.
    2600k @ 5.0Ghz 1.54V, Giga Z68, Zotac GTX680 AMP!, Patriot 1066Mhz 8GB RAM, Custom water, Silverstone 1000W, HAF932

  12. #12
    Xtreme Old School Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,660
    Originally posted by OPPAINTER
    Well here's my XP2400@2700,, 1000 less Mhz then your P4 and the CPU bench kicks your booty

    OPP
    Fantastic OC my friend and Guru..

    But the numbers don't make much sense to me and really demonstrate the inaccuracy of Sandra Benchies..

    Your XP2400@2700 gives 10.196MIPS and a PR3930, my P42800@3700 gives only 9.000 MIPS but a PR4077.

    Definitively we need some more accurate benchmarks to compare both platforms..


  13. #13
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Lisboa, Portugal
    Posts
    320
    here's a score from my DDR system...

    Using regular 256MB PC2700 Samsung D with relaxed timings...

    http://pwp.netcabo.pt/raptor/sandra_176_234.jpg

    And one from my old Rimms System...

    http://pwp.netcabo.pt/raptor/sandramem.jpg


    ps: had to put on links because the pictures are to big for 56k'ers...
    Raptor AMD Opteron 148 Cabne || Asus A8N32-SLI Deluxe || XFX Geforce 7800 GTX 512Mb XXX Edition

  14. #14
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    101
    You guys need to compare by running spec benchmarks. :thumbsup:
    Abit IT7-Max V-modded CP-moddedbios
    P4 3.06 Prometeia cooled @ 4140
    512 Corsair XMS3500C2 @ 479DDR
    ATI Radeon 9700 Pro (398/364)
    SB Audigy
    Chettah U160 18LP 15k rpm
    PC Power and Cooling 475PFC
    PCM2k2 - 10,130

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    32
    Well here's my XP2400@2700,, 1000 less Mhz then your P4 and the CPU bench kicks your booty
    I think i love you OPP :p

    ...just wish i had all the money you had, to upgrade every 15mins

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    181
    Originally posted by ronnie0738
    You guys need to compare by running spec benchmarks. :thumbsup:
    or better application based benchmaks. Sandra is nice for a first look but not really showing what's going on, I mean nobody would seriously compare CPU power by running Sandra

    Run Sysmark or Content Creations Winstone or other productivity
    test and and you will see the difference between a XP2700+ and a P4 3700 Quite a substuntial one. I have compared a while a go a XP 2200+ with a P4 2.26 and they were basically at equal level, and now guess what will happen if you compare a 2700+ and a P4 3700 Mhz with applications. In most tests the XP 2700 will look very old. In Content Creation 2002 you will see at least a difference of 10%.
    Last edited by chainbolt; 11-11-2002 at 08:48 AM.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Back in London
    Posts
    488
    Superpi/pifast and 3dmark are good comparisons, and with the former I dont think any p4 will keep up with a 2.8ghz amd, the latter can be seen on the orb, like 12th position beating everything upto 3.5ghz p4, thats likely to be mostly mem bandwidth limitations of amd compared to rambus or ddr pulled up p4 scores...

    ]JR[

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    181
    Originally posted by ]JR[
    Superpi/pifast and 3dmark are good comparisons, and with the former I dont think any p4 will keep up with a 2.8ghz amd, the latter can be seen on the orb, like 12th position beating everything upto 3.5ghz p4, thats likely to be mostly mem bandwidth limitations of amd compared to rambus or ddr pulled up p4 scores...

    ]JR[
    We know since the launch of the K7 core that Athlons are more "productive", their ouput is higher at the same frequency. It's a stoneold story, and it does not help, becuase that is more than compensated by the much higher frequency the P4 core is capable of, and that's it. Therefore all top postions are hold by P4 systems and not by Athlons.

    And the best is that we have a RDRAM system running at 138 MHz with a score above 20,000: that is still the direction where to look at. The top score is also hold by a RDRAM system. It's shame that this technology is put to rest now.
    Last edited by chainbolt; 11-11-2002 at 09:11 AM.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    186
    Money is nothing if you don't have technique
    Updating...

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    181
    Originally posted by NoOne
    Money is nothing if you don't have technique
    same goes for the girlfriends

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    186
    hehehe.. realy
    Updating...

  22. #22
    Xtreme Christmas Lighter
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Upstate NY, USA
    Posts
    3,790
    Originally posted by ]JR[
    Superpi/pifast and 3dmark are good comparisons, and with the former I dont think any p4 will keep up with a 2.8ghz amd, the latter can be seen on the orb, like 12th position beating everything upto 3.5ghz p4, thats likely to be mostly mem bandwidth limitations of amd compared to rambus or ddr pulled up p4 scores...

    ]JR[
    Or how about about SETI@home... P4's need over 1GHz to be competitive.

    http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~mu.../benchmark.htm

    I know that if you are purely into high performance then a P4 is hard to beat, but AMD is not too far behind and the CPU, mobo, and memory(not so much anymore, but RDRAM is still king) are all less $$$ so it's definitely a better bang for the buck with AMD.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Christmas Lighter
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Upstate NY, USA
    Posts
    3,790
    Originally posted by chainbolt
    Run Sysmark or Content Creations Winstone or other productivity test and and you will see the difference between a XP2700+ and a P4 3700...
    Since the P4 is overclocked, why would you compare it to a stock 2700+? That sounds like a marketing strategy.

    If you want to be "fair", compare that P4 with a 2700+ that's overclocked to 2.8 or 2.9GHz... now that'd be something I'd like to see. I really don't think the P4 would show a substantial performance margin.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    990
    it isnt 2700+ as they dont actually exist (or no doubt people would have them?) its 2.7ghz.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    390
    From the P4 3.06GHz HT Sandra scores, I can see that P4 HT will laugh at AthlonXP in Sandra very soon.........

    F@H boxen 39,869 MHz - Standford stats - EOC stats - Folding 4000 Club
    Dugu 9 Tweaks: 3DMark 2001 guides || RAM timings || Recommended RAM settings for P4 DC DDR system || How-to: Overclocking Athlon64
    My PC: A64 3200+ :: Shuttle AN50R :: 2x256MB XMSX3500 @ 270Mhz 2.5-2-2-6 3.4V& 512MB XMS3200LL @ 245MHz 2-2-2-6 3.1V :: Excalibur HIS 9800Pro 128MB :: CMV CT-722D 17inLCD :: 3DMark 2001: 24515 || Watercooling coming "real soon now"...

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •