Geforce Titan - GK110 will be a consumer part

[Handrox]

this result in Physx Fluid, Driver?

[prava]

8800gtx was faster than 7950gx2 by a good margin so it's certainly possible but not probable -you're right- nvidia is not as she was...

I thought there was a new integration node with 8800GTX..,. as well as a totally different architecture. Let alone how crappy SLI was those days.... bad example, mate

Among the GTX 680 vs GTX 690 is only 35% difference in performance? If that right there is the Titan will trounce the GTX 690 even if 40-60% stronger than the GTX 680.

lulz? Where do you see a 35% difference in performance? I see 42% difference...

but there is but

What is there to see in that picture?

[Handrox]

prava 83 -> 118 = 35

[zalbard]

prava 83 -> 118 = 35

It should be: ( ( 118 - 83 ) / 83 ) * 100% = ~42.17% ...

[boxleitnerb]

Guys, are we really discussing results obtained in a CPU bottleneck?

[Handrox]

It should be: ( ( 118 - 83 ) / 83 ) * 100% = ~42.17% ...

but there does not speak of 118fps vs 83fps but 118% - 83%, so I think that you guys are talking about should be used if we speak of frames per second.

Even so 42% is very little ..

[LordEC911]

but there does not speak of 118fps vs 83fps but 118% - 83%, so I think that you guys are talking about should be used if we speak of frames per second.

Even so 42% is very little ..

No, you use that math to calculate the % improvement.
Zal- That is a lot of steps to find out 118/83=1.42

[zalbard]

Zal- That is a lot of steps to find out 118/83=1.42

1.42 != 42%.

[iMacmatician]

hi guys

Exclusive NVIDIA GEFORCE GTX Titan Final Specification





http://www.arabpcworld.com/?p=26335

The "Titan" in the title is of a different color and probably in a different font than the rest of the title. Seems a bit fishy to me but who knows.

[boxleitnerb]

42% faster = 1.42. Let's get back to Titan

[informal]

Math is a wonderful science isn't it ?

[Iconyu]

The "Titan" in the title is of a different color and probably in a different font than the rest of the title. Seems a bit fishy to me but who knows.

Yes it is a different font, there is only one shared letter but they are not the same.

[LordEC911]

Anyone else feel the supposed boost clocks seem a little high?

[tbone8ty]

This is off topic but what memory speed are the radeon hd 7000 cards?

[bamtan2]

Anyone else feel the supposed boost clocks seem a little high?

yes. if 680 boosts around 100mhz to 1100mhz-1200mhz, then a chip 2x bigger boosting to 1000mhz+ does seem aggressive.

the only clock speed I trust so far is the opencl one below. 875mhz is around 100mhz more than the k20x, and this makes sense. trade some efficiency for more performance in this enthusiast card, and boost will take it to 900-something mhz, very close to 1000mhz, maybe even a little over. I will be slightly surprised if titan really boosts over 1000mhz, but not very surprised if it is just 1005mhz or whatever. I just think ~950mhz makes more sense. this is still looking to be a 250W card easily

GTX Titan OpenCL Environment Vs 7970GHz :

http://tof.canardpc.com/view/2a8b0fe...a23d3f40f4.jpg

Reporting 2688SP/875MHz/6GB

http://clbenchmark.com/compare.jsp?c...fig_1=14470292

Found on 3DCenter, thanks to Godmode

[Lanek]

This is off topic but what memory speed are the radeon hd 7000 cards?

Stock was 5500mhz , GHZ it is 6000mhz.

Anyway, yes boost seems too much high for 240W, and the slide is strange ( 2 colors font, font dont completely match, strange way of write the specs for the memory ( no space between the / and have you allready see a gpu brand write "b" for bit .. )
Cant say if it is a true one or not ( depend who have done the slide who is similar of the 680 slide )

[highoctane]

Considering 28nm is a mature process at this point both AMD and Nvidia should both have an idea how best to utilize the transistor designs for 28nm to optimize their gpus for power and performance.

Just because 1st get 680 consumed xxx power for xxx clock speed doesn't mean new designs on the same process will perform identical even on the same node.

I'm sure there is allot learned as far as what kind of transistor to use where to optimize power efficiency as general gpu design optimization for a particular node.

For the most part I'll reserve my thoughts until I see real numbers.

[aussie-revhead]

yes. if 680 boosts around 100mhz to 1100mhz-1200mhz, then a chip 2x bigger boosting to 1000mhz+ does seem aggressive.

the only clock speed I trust so far is the opencl one below. 875mhz is around 100mhz more than the k20x, and this makes sense. trade some efficiency for more performance in this enthusiast card, and boost will take it to 900-something mhz, very close to 1000mhz, maybe even a little over. I will be slightly surprised if titan really boosts over 1000mhz, but not very surprised if it is just 1005mhz or whatever. I just think ~950mhz makes more sense. this is still looking to be a 250W card easily

I am curious to see how this spec compares (benches and games) compared to a good 680 Lightning at near 1500mhz .... Hopefully water will help Titan greatly, as long as it is fed enough juice.

[CryptiK]

Thing is, thr 580 didn't want to clock that well, 950 was very good, 1000 was stellar and took a lot of juice and cooling, aaaand custom PCB to make it comfortable. Stock vGPU they were nothing overly special, 900 - 925 MHz. This is another power hungry (probably hot with the same size cooler to dissipate 230+ w) card limited with (so we're told) no voltage adjustment and 8 phase 'nvidia spec' VRM, I honestly think a moderate at best OC is expected. That said they should be powerful even stock, so with all that firepower for gamers I doubt overclocking is even neccessary unless using huge resolution/cracked hardcore GFX games.

[emertX]

real benchmarks:
http://www.hardware-infos.com/news/4...ark-score.html

[Andrew LB]

http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/b14...GTX_Titan.html

GPU Name: GK110
Process Size: 28 nm
Transistors: 7,080 million
Die Size: 502 mm?

Render Config
Shading Units: 2688
TMUs: 224
ROPs: 48
SMX: 14

Pixel Rate: 51.2 GPixel/s

Texture Rate: 205.0 GTexel/s

Floating-point: 4,919.04 GFLOPS

Graphics Features
DirectX: 11.1
OpenGL: 4.3
OpenCL: 1.2
Shader Model: 5.0

Released: February 18, 2013
Bus Interface: PCIe 3.0 x16 ?
ASUS Part #: GTXTITAN-6GD5

Clock Speeds
GPU Clock: 915 MHz
Boost Clock: 1019.5 MHz
Memory Clock: 1502 MHz (6008 MHz effective)


Memory
Memory Size: 6144 MB
Memory Type: GDDR5
Memory Bus: 384 bit
Bandwidth: 288.4 GB/s


Reference Board
Slot Width: Dual-slot
TDP: 235 W
Outputs: 2x DVI
1x HDMI
1x DisplayPort

[GoldenTiger]

Good finds.... .

[Handrox]

real benchmarks:
http://www.hardware-infos.com/news/4...ark-score.html
@ Andrew LB

thx

[emertX]

your welcome!

[Tha Last Meal]

guys come on it is the same Result from Obr-Hardware That appeared two days before



http://www.obr-hardware.com/2013/02/...l-numbers.html
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...=1#post5169787