If you follow the link the image is barely readable, but if you use "right click" -> "show image" it's fine.
Anyway, here's the corresponding HWBot submission.
If you follow the link the image is barely readable, but if you use "right click" -> "show image" it's fine.
Anyway, here's the corresponding HWBot submission.
just receive this kits today. Apacer 8gb x4 2666 CL12 , Try it on my new bios . And something happened .
Direct boot 2856mhz , 12 14 14 35 . And hyper Pi 32M stable ! World first with 8gbx4 ?
![]()
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
New bios 115D updated . added memory profile . Will add more soon.
picx.xfastest.com/nickshih/asrock/Z77OCF115D.rar
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
This board loves psc ramīs
![]()
1,805V in bios , but the real voltage mensured with Fluke 115 multimeter is 1,830V ....
the ~25mv difference remains indifferent what voltage set in bios( 1,5v is 1,530 , 1,650 is 1,675 etc..).. please check and you guys![]()
New option : Memory Profile in 1.15D
![]()
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
hmmm not sure I will have to check haha, the only reason I use it is because it is on the thumbdrive and it doesn't require an installer, just a standalone app.
is your tool able to run with out an installer?
I will give it a go tonight Nick, thanks for the prompt response![]()
i update bios 1.15B , but missing the new option " memory profile" in DRAM tab![]()
Memory profile will has on 1.15D Nachtfalke not 1.15B you need for update again check at #280
about memory slot, on my mind or my experience with IVB cpu i thing it depend by CPU not a motherboard
from i tried with my seven different CPU for 6x 3770K and one 3570K on a same mobo
some chip of 3770K like inside slot or mean to install with inside will better for OC and some chip like outside slot
then you should be check your CPU what side of slot is better
btw. i can't confirm for this is true or not but it come from i meet it on my tried to OC ram from different CPUs
Cheer.
Last edited by ZoLKoRn; 09-20-2012 at 12:44 PM.
Sorry For My English
OverclockZone Team
THAILAND
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
If he lead you to believe that it gains performance from CAS, indeed it is.
Intel Gulftown, Lynnfield, Clarkdale, Nehalem, Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-E, none of them supports below CAS 6.
If you have an honest interest in why he might have used CAS 5 for a 32M, PM me, or PM him...![]()
Competition ranking;
2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)
Spectating;
2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!
the reason why we lock it is because TCL changes after MRC training is just a number, you can adjust TCL3 or 2 or whatever you are doing:
nobody ever wonders why performance is so bad with 'TCL 5' here??
I keep mom on stuff , dont like to rain on peoples parade but when you try to call on something i think is more of a moral as to whether to l;ock fake settings or not.
I can set TCL even after training and before windows load but what is the point of Fake TCL?
Bookmarks