Page 89 of 143 FirstFirst ... 39798687888990919299139 ... LastLast
Results 2,201 to 2,225 of 3567

Thread: Kepler Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

  1. #2201
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    WOOOOOF

  2. #2202
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    Posts
    328
    Quote Originally Posted by Russian View Post
    6,739 words later... I'm done.

    You guys can read my review soon. :P
    Wow, I guess I will keep that one for last, probably can finish the others altogether in the same time I would read yours. Does it really take so many words to write a review in russian ?
    BTW where could I read that ?

  3. #2203
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    GK104 is a very powerful GPU, but it seems to be bandwidth limited at resolutions over 1080p.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4622_23_nvidia_geforce_gtx_680_kepler_2gb_reference_card_video_card_review.png 
Views:	960 
Size:	39.5 KB 
ID:	124755

    Res....... 7970 ...... GTX 680 .....
    1050p: 133 fps | 162 fps (122%)
    1200p: 118 fps | 135 fps (114%)
    1600p: 082 fps | 083 fps (101%)

    Now imagine that GK110 comes with 384 bit, or even 512 bit bus width. Even with 'just' 50% more shaders it should be able to pull 60%+ ahead.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  4. #2204
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    Posts
    328
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    GK104 is a very powerful GPU, but it seems to be bandwidth limited at resolutions over 1080p.

    Now imagine that GK110 comes with 384 bit, or even 512 bit bus width. Even with 'just' 50% more shaders it should be able to pull 60%+ ahead.
    Don't tease me... Been waiting for this card for 4 months, now should look forward to another half a year of wait for the GK110. T_T

  5. #2205
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    Quote Originally Posted by Kuroimaho View Post
    Wow, I guess I will keep that one for last, probably can finish the others altogether in the same time I would read yours. Does it really take so many words to write a review in russian ?
    BTW where could I read that ?
    Ironically, its not in Russian. Its in English. Bright Side of News* is where you can find it. I'd give you a pre-emptive link but nobody can confirm if its actually keeping our review from the public

    Thanks for the interest, its only 11 pages I just cover a lot.
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  6. #2206
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    GK104 is a very powerful GPU, but it seems to be bandwidth limited at resolutions over 1080p.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4622_23_nvidia_geforce_gtx_680_kepler_2gb_reference_card_video_card_review.png 
Views:	960 
Size:	39.5 KB 
ID:	124755

    Res....... 7970 ...... GTX 680 .....
    1050p: 133 fps | 162 fps (122%)
    1200p: 118 fps | 135 fps (114%)
    1600p: 082 fps | 083 fps (101%)

    Now imagine that GK110 comes with 384 bit, or even 512 bit bus width. Even with 'just' 50% more shaders it should be able to pull 60%+ ahead.

    I do not think so
    look here



    Res....... 7970 ...... GTX 680 .....
    1600p: 127 fps | 161 fps



    Res....... 7970 ...... GTX 680 .....
    1600p: 63 fps | 71 fps



    Res....... 7970 ...... GTX 680 .....
    1600p: 63 fps | 76 fps



    Res....... 7970 ...... GTX 680 .....
    1600p: 133 fps | 151 fps
    WOOOOOF

  7. #2207
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    America's Finest City
    Posts
    2,078
    I'm going to sleep, its 4:30am I've been awake for 20 hours. 17 of which I spent working on this review, lol
    Quote Originally Posted by FUGGER View Post
    I am magical.

  8. #2208
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal View Post
    I do not think so
    look here
    It doesn't have to happen in every single application. Some games are more bandwidth intensive. Fps reduction going from 1200p to 1600p for GTX 680 is noticeably greater than for 7970 in most scenarios.
    Almost definitely not a VRAM amount issue, though.
    Last edited by zalbard; 03-22-2012 at 03:34 AM.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  9. #2209
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    247
    In Dx11 games overall perfomance GTX680 VS reference speed HD7970 is as follows:

    1920x1200 4xAA16xAF +9,1%
    1920x1200 8xAA16xAF +8,9%
    2560x1600 4xAA16xAF +5,2%
    2560x1600 8xAA16xAF +3,5%

    http://translate.google.com/translat...#137;€

    Additional source of table http://www.upload.ee/image/2185336/total.png

  10. #2210
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Cebu, Philippines
    Posts
    59
    GTX 680 leaked launch video






    Source: http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/26...p-at-neweggcom
    Last edited by snoid_zero; 03-22-2012 at 04:26 AM.

    Gigabyte GA-X38-DQ6
    Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.4Ghz (Zalman CNPS9700 LED)
    Corsair Twin2X4096-6400C4DHX @ DDR2-1066
    RIP GeForce 9800 GX2 715/1720/1050
    2 x 500GB WD Caviar SE (RAID 0)
    Corsair HX-620W
    ACER P243WAID 1920 x 1200

  11. #2211
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    353
    @up

    ORLY?
    i5 2500K (L041C124) @ 5GHz + Scythe Mugen 2 rev. B | ASRock P67 Extreme4 B3 UEFI L3.19 | ADATA 2x4GB DDR3 1600 | MSI Radeon RX 470 4GB | 2x Crucial m4 64GB SSD RAID 0, Seagate 7200.12 500GB, Samsung F4 EG 2TB | 24" HP LP2475w | EVGA SuperNOVA G2 750W | Fractal Design Define R3 | Windows 10 64 bit

  12. #2212
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Valencia, Espaa
    Posts
    146
    in the box say DX11, the GPU-Z say DX11.1... LOL


  13. #2213
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Ankara Turkey
    Posts
    2,631
    price is 20 minutes later but i confirmed that my local store will start to sell just after nda lifted. so availability is very very good.


    When i'm being paid i always do my job through.

  14. #2214
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Istanbul
    Posts
    606
    Quote Originally Posted by kromosto View Post
    price is 20 minutes later but i confirmed that my local store will start to sell just after nda lifted. so availability is very very good.
    What's the price here? 7970 was 800 to 1000$ on january launch

  15. #2215
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Ealing, UK
    Posts
    153
    .

  16. #2216
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Ankara Turkey
    Posts
    2,631
    @kaktus1907 dont know yet bt vatan is counting down


    When i'm being paid i always do my job through.

  17. #2217

  18. #2218
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    GTX 680 = $500......good price
    based on toms review + tweaktown Review shows us that GTX 680 beat HD 7970 By (15%-18%) 1920x1200.
    Do not forget that HD 7970 price: $550!
    WOOOOOF

  19. #2219
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    FYI, Tweaktown was NOT using the correct drivers for the GTX 680.

  20. #2220
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Denmark / Aarhus
    Posts
    1,036
    Then we should expect pricedrop on 7970 I suppose?
    Desktop I5-3570k, 8GB Ram, GTX 560, Silverstone TJ08-E, Crucial M4 128GB, 750W Silver Power, ASUS P8Z77-M
    Laptop ThinkPad W520 2720QM /2 x 4 GB ram / Quadro 1000M / Crucial M4 128GB + 500Gb Hdd / FHD Screen / Intel WiFi Link 6300 AGN WLAN / 9 Cell Battery
    Laptop 2 New Macbook Pro Retina / i7 QuadCore / 650 GT / 16GB Ram / 512 GB SSD
    Server: Athlon II X4 640, ASROCK K10N78, 8GB Ram, LSI MegaRaid 8 port, 64GB Vertex 1, 5 x 1 TB WD Raid6, 3 x 3TB Seagate Raid5

  21. #2221
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    So near, yet so far.
    Posts
    737
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    FYI, Tweaktown was NOT using the correct drivers for the GTX 680.
    Means there's more juice for the 680...
    [[Daily R!G]]
    Core i7 920 D0 @ 4.0GHz w/ 1.325 vcore.
    Rampage II Gene||CM HAF 932||HX850||MSI GTX 660ti PE OC||Corsair H50||G.Skill Phoenix 3 240GB||G.Skill NQ 6x2GB||Samsung 2333SW

    flickr

  22. #2222
    Xtreme XIP
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,559
    edit8 wrong link.
    Last edited by chispy; 03-22-2012 at 04:59 AM.

  23. #2223
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970

  24. #2224
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    FYI, Tweaktown was NOT using the correct drivers for the GTX 680.
    This means that the results that we have seen in the Tweaktown review is not accurate?
    WOOOOOF

  25. #2225
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,970
    Quote Originally Posted by labs23 View Post
    Means there's more juice for the 680...
    Hope so... would take some of the sting out of likely not getting my 2x eVGA 680's until Monday since they didn't ship last night .

Page 89 of 143 FirstFirst ... 39798687888990919299139 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •