New Crucial 1.5V DDR3 Kits

[Cecil]

Memtest stable? What voltage did you use?
From my testing it was *kinda* stable at 1960 same settings and voltage (1.65V), but 1T.
Every 1MHz HTRef up, required one step higher voltage. So, for 2000 1T I'd need around 1.72V or higher.
Can run 2000 8-8-8-24 1T 1.65V, but it's not memtest stable.

I spent a couple hours running different 3dmarks, pcmarks, heaven, and a Spi1m at 2088Mhz 8-8-8-24-47-1T with 1.675Vdimm, and can do 2000 8-8-8-24-47-1T with 1.65V no problem. I havent had time for Prime or Spi32m yet though. Im going to re-do my daily OC to be around 2000 ish so I can be at 8-8-8 and 1T instead of 2200 9-9-9 and 2T.

[Cecil]

AMD FX8120 5.1Ghz Spi1m.JPGAMD FX8120 5Ghz Spi32m.JPG

[Barr3l Rid3r]

AMD FX8120 5.1Ghz Spi1m.JPGAMD FX8120 5Ghz Spi32m.JPG

something is definately wrong there:



my sammys at 2250 11-11-11 do about the same, so maybe timmings doesn't matter too much as before or maybe imc still not efficient

[Cecil]

something is definately wrong there:


my sammys at 2250 11-11-11 do about the same, so maybe timmings doesn't matter too much as before or maybe imc still not efficient

I dont do any tweeks or wazza or any of that crap. I just run it.

[BeepBeep2]

I dont do any tweeks or wazza or any of that crap. I just run it.

I don't think Barrel Rider does those either...

I only do if I'm benching for HWBOT.org or some kind of competition.

[Cecil]

I don't think Barrel Rider does those either...

I only do if I'm benching for HWBOT.org or some kind of competition.

Oh, I figured thats what you guys were talking about. There wasnt much of a time difference, and there was a big difference in memory speed. Seems more speed is better for 32m, while tighter timings for 1m.

Also, what board was that with? Im using a Sabertooth, which is more of a "stable" line of boards, so Im guessing they relax the secondary timings some on it compared to the CHV or some of the Gig boards.