MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 196

Thread: AMD's smoothness factor put to the test by AMD & HardOCP...

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtremely Kool
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,875
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/2715

    Originally Posted by anand
    After playing through the several levels on each platform, we thought the Phenom II 940 offered a better overall gaming experience in this title than the Intel Q9550 based on smoother game play. It is difficult to quantify without a video capture, but player movement and weapon control just seemed to be more precise. Of course, if you have the funds, we would recommend the i7 platform for best possible performance.
    Last edited by Final8ty; 01-24-2012 at 04:46 PM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Final8ty View Post
    http://www.anandtech.com/show/2715

    Originally Posted by anand
    After playing through the several levels on each platform, we thought the Phenom II 940 offered a better overall gaming experience in this title than the Intel Q9550 based on smoother game play. It is difficult to quantify without a video capture, but player movement and weapon control just seemed to be more precise. Of course, if you have the funds, we would recommend the i7 platform for best possible performance.
    You know, I always noticed a few quirks here and there while I was on 775. I wouldn't be surprised if that were true.

    I'm not at all buying that bulldozer offers a smoother experience than sandy though. Not at all and I've yet to make one person make that claim. I saw one guy on Rage3d claim that this framerates in Cryostasis doubled when moving from a Phenom 2 to 2600k. We've all seen the Skyrim benchmarks and the Arma2 benchmarks. In a lot of cpu limited games Bulldozer really lags behind. On the other hand Sandybridge really has been a smooth, issue free ride for me. I actually felt the same way with Lynnfield.

  3. #3
    Xtremely Kool
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,875
    Quote Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ View Post
    You know, I always noticed a few quirks here and there while I was on 775. I wouldn't be surprised if that were true.

    I'm not at all buying that bulldozer offers a smoother experience than sandy though. Not at all and I've yet to make one person make that claim. I saw one guy on Rage3d claim that this framerates in Cryostasis doubled when moving from a Phenom 2 to 2600k. We've all seen the Skyrim benchmarks and the Arma2 benchmarks. In a lot of cpu limited games Bulldozer really lags behind. On the other hand Sandybridge really has been a smooth, issue free ride for me. I actually felt the same way with Lynnfield.
    I'm doubtful that the BD was smoother on its own accord, the Intel could of had the timing slacked on the ram, HT turned on which can have issues in some games ect....

  4. #4
    Xtremely Kool
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,875
    At the end of the day no enthusiast should take such things literally because the things that matter to us and things we notice would not matter to the average consumer, if it good enough to do the job for the average consumer then its a job done as anything more would just goto waste on them because they don't notice anyway.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •