MMM
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 38 of 38

Thread: Quanta sues AMD over defective chips

  1. #26
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler View Post
    Didn't NVIDIA just have a spat of mobile chips that had issues? Yeah.. mistakes still slip through the cracks. Now the problem is whether this was greed or a misunderstanding.
    NV whent and shipped every chipset and mobile non g92 part for like 3 years that was ROHS compliant with the bad solder and the chips disconnected from the boards, it wasnt from specs or anything other than NV being stupid or not caring to redesign chips that were meant for led solder.

    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    One multi billion dollar company with teams of lawyers and product specialists sues another multi billion dollar company over a potentially defective product and you call BS? Is that a knee jerk reaction or something?

    Read the lawsuit. It isn't BS at all. If you check out the documents filed and read the official press releases, this is about AMD misreporting the thermal characteristics of their chips. They sent information to Quanta, Quanta used that information to design thermal management solutions that were supposed to (if AMD's information was accurate) efficiently disperse the chip's heat. Instead, AMD's chips went OVER their stated TDP envelope, overwhelmed the cooling solution and essentially caused a large amount of RMA due to malfunctioning notebooks.

    That's pretty serious stuff IMO but as the article stated, the fact that this couldn't be settled out of court is very surprising.
    i guess u would most likely be right, but if u ever used one of their laptops they were bound to kill whatever chips were in them, the chips im 100% sure were not speced for passive cooling and thats what those laptops basically use.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    800
    Interestingly, in programming, that statement need not necessarily means Intel TDP != Real Life TDP , btw.

    Anyway, that said, why didn't other manufacturers sue AMD for the same reasons?
    Last edited by blindbox; 01-04-2012 at 03:00 PM.

  3. #28
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    644
    A little know fault that affects older Athlons 64 is what I'm dealing with. The thermal grease bewthem the Core and the Heatspreader seems to dry up after a few years causing the Processor to SEVERELY overheat.

  4. #29
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Hmm, but aren't AMD (and intel) CPU warranties only 3 years?
    Smile

  5. #30
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    504
    Ouch, AMD took an arrow in the knee.
    IQ_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL

    outdated hardware

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    139
    not sure how they are going to prove that... might as well be the cpu voltage that was set to high by the motherboard.

  7. #32
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by highoctane View Post
    If AMD understated the tdp of a product and it ended up exceeding the capacity of the cooling solution engineered around AMD's claimed specifications then I see reasonable fault with AMD's specification.

    Company X makes a train advertised to travel at a max speed of 200mph
    Company Y manufactures and installs the track for the train which has a rated max safe speed of 200mph
    Who would be at fault if the trains running on the track derailed because the trains where capable of exceeding their max claimed 200mph speed, the max speed for which the rails where designed to operate safely.
    tires for cars are just like that. you buy tires rated for a speed beyond the cars max speed for that very reason. i sure would not want to be on a train if all they had to do was go down hill and increase the speed by .1 mph for it to fly off the tracks, things like wear and tear would reduce the max speed aswell. same goes for thermal properties. imagine the room goes up 5C, completely ignoring the cooling capacity which we can assume is working 100% like new, whos fault would it be then? do we blame the person who touched the thromostat, or the heatsink which was built to work just well enough? if the heatsink is built exactly for the TDP, then i hope theirs no dust buildup slowing the fan down by even 1%.
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  8. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2
    none of you have the facts straight here is a nice source to point all of you in the right direction.
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-57...;siu-container

    "The suit is centered on the ATI RS600ME, an integrated graphics solution, an AMD spokesperson told CNET."

    Now here is a schematic of the affected part http://notebookschematic.com/wp-cont...06/NEC-SG1.png

    Looks to me intel is starting trouble again and using quanta as a pawn. I mean isn't it funny that 1 week before CES Amd has such a negative headline regarding its chips and the culprit is an old intel chipset that they had absolutely nothing to do with.

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by mAxius View Post
    none of you have the facts straight here is a nice source to point all of you in the right direction.
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-57...;siu-container

    "The suit is centered on the ATI RS600ME, an integrated graphics solution, an AMD spokesperson told CNET."

    Now here is a schematic of the affected part http://notebookschematic.com/wp-cont...06/NEC-SG1.png

    Looks to me intel is starting trouble again and using quanta as a pawn. I mean isn't it funny that 1 week before CES Amd has such a negative headline regarding its chips and the culprit is an old intel chipset that they had absolutely nothing to do with.
    Over two years to make a post and this is it? Its intels fault?

  10. #35
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,445
    Quote Originally Posted by mAxius View Post
    none of you have the facts straight here is a nice source to point all of you in the right direction.
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-57...;siu-container

    "The suit is centered on the ATI RS600ME, an integrated graphics solution, an AMD spokesperson told CNET."

    Now here is a schematic of the affected part http://notebookschematic.com/wp-cont...06/NEC-SG1.png

    Looks to me intel is starting trouble again and using quanta as a pawn. I mean isn't it funny that 1 week before CES Amd has such a negative headline regarding its chips and the culprit is an old intel chipset that they had absolutely nothing to do with.

    ...wtf? although i would not be surprised if intel was involved, you did you come up with that conclusion? because i doubt intel has any dogs in this fight.



    Quote Originally Posted by gallag View Post
    Over two years to make a post and this is it? Its intels fault?
    lol he borrowed your tinfoil hat.
    [MOBO] Asus CrossHair Formula 5 AM3+
    [GPU] ATI 6970 x2 Crossfire 2Gb
    [RAM] G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1600
    [CPU] AMD FX-8120 @ 4.8 ghz
    [COOLER] XSPC Rasa 750 RS360 WaterCooling
    [OS] Windows 8 x64 Enterprise
    [HDD] OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD
    [AUDIO] Logitech S-220 17 Watts 2.1

  11. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2
    more info here http://www.dailytech.com/Quanta+Sues...ticle23679.htm

    this is what came to mind when i saw amd has a x86 tablet http://hothardware.com/News/Taiwanes...DBased-Tablet/ and this perhaps this was a move to create so much negative attention no one would notice it. since intel is set to release x86 tablets and smartphone chips at ces
    Last edited by mAxius; 01-05-2012 at 05:49 PM.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    He was talking about this :
    http://notebookschematic.com/?p=13280



    Note that the chipset was designed by ATi and was for intel yonah CPUs.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by god_43 View Post


    lol he borrowed your tinfoil hat.
    I suppose its not as crazy as my idea lol, but if i had over two years to make a post it might even make sense.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •