Is there any software avalible to push tahiti beyond overdrive limits?
Is there any software avalible to push tahiti beyond overdrive limits?
blue side of Power
Mobo East OC Team
Barely beating a 580? hmm..... Lets hope thats not true, if so im sure many people will be holding off for GTX 780/770
Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.6ghz| Corsair H100i | MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming Edition | 16GB Corsair Vengeance @ 2.4GHZ | eVGA GTX 780 | Creative Sound Blaster ZxR | Samsung 500GB SSD/4TB Storage | LG 14X BLu-Ray Burner | Corsair HX1050 | Corsair Air 540 | Asus VG248QE 144HZ Monitor
Looks like 7990 is going to be a beast..
and with a beastly price... ouch.
Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H
G-Skill Ripjaws X 16Gb - 2133Mhz
Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme
i7 2600k @ 4.4Ghz
Sapphire 7970 OC 1.2Ghz
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 128Gb
Meh, the 7970 results aren't really impressive. Maybe if they moved to XDR2 results could have been more interesting.
AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160
If true awesome results for the 7970
When compared to the 6970(cayman) vs gtx 580, those graphs seem off considering the 6970 is using 11.11B drivers. These results seem especially off for the Civ 5 results and Batman Arkham city results. It seems like there is a huge amount of fudge factor and like typical marketing slides, are pretty much worthless. Better to wait for real results before making judgement.
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
-Project Sakura-
Intel i7 860 @ 4.0Ghz, Asus Maximus III Formula, 8GB G-Skill Ripjaws X F3 (@ 1600Mhz), 2x GTX 295 Quad SLI
2x 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 RAID 0, OCZ ZX 1000W, NZXT Phantom (Pink), Dell SX2210T Touch Screen, Windows 8.1 Pro
Koolance RP-401X2 1.1 (w/ Swiftech MCP35X), XSPC EX420, XSPC X-Flow 240, DT Sniper, EK-FC 295s (w/ RAM Blocks), Enzotech M3F Mosfet+NB/SB
Yes, at same time, just a precision, it seems there's only 1 driver usable now for the 7970 ( you can download it if you access on NDA.AMD.COM ). And with the big change on the code of the gpu ( and so how the driver work with the hardware) , i suspect some drivers will be needed ...
I personally wait on Anandtech reviews... not cause i like how they bench the card ( not the case ), but cause with the excellent preview of gcn made by them in June, i hope they will go in deep of the architecture this time.
CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0
Well, that's really not the case when you see things with green tinted rose glasses.
I don't think that's true, 78xx will use Pitcairn chip, and that baby is a member of GCN (Graphic Core Next) family, along with Tahiti, Cape Verde, & New Zealand.![]()
Rig:
Intel Core 2 Quad 9400 @4.0 GHz watercooled
AMD Radeon HD 5850 @950 MHz
4 GB Adata Vitesta
DFI LanParty X38
Creative XFi
2 WDC black 640 GB RAID 0, 2 WDC caviar 1.5 GB
Silverstone 700 w
Thermaltake Kandalf
24" Samsung LCD TV full HD
This guy is xtremely lazy
Will we see this again
![]()
-Project Sakura-
Intel i7 860 @ 4.0Ghz, Asus Maximus III Formula, 8GB G-Skill Ripjaws X F3 (@ 1600Mhz), 2x GTX 295 Quad SLI
2x 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 RAID 0, OCZ ZX 1000W, NZXT Phantom (Pink), Dell SX2210T Touch Screen, Windows 8.1 Pro
Koolance RP-401X2 1.1 (w/ Swiftech MCP35X), XSPC EX420, XSPC X-Flow 240, DT Sniper, EK-FC 295s (w/ RAM Blocks), Enzotech M3F Mosfet+NB/SB
It'd definitely stir things up considering we haven't seen that happen since the x1950xtx... I don't think we will this time though, considering a big reason for those differences in performance numbers between the 580 and 7970 in that slide is that 1.5gb isn't enough for high aa at 2560 and damn well not enough for 3+ screens with AA, and the 580 isn't going to be what AMD are up against.
That, I'm waiting in anticipation for this show-down between both camps new cards. GPU cycles (not refreshes, but the initial releases) are my favorite time of the hardware year.
Probably not, each process switch makes each mm2 more important. So if AMD continues to use less die space and both architectures are reasonably close on performance per transistor then each mm2 AMD don't use gives nvidia a bigger advantage if they continue to use the 'All in' strategy they've used for some time. On 22nm AMD will either have to match nvidia's die size or have a superior architecture because giving up 100mm2 is going to hurt. Sure AMD can claw some of it back with their dual GPU cards, but when it comes down to it, people rarely compare the 5970 to the 480.
True, but the 580GTX in 3GB configuration isn't really a vanilla card, a few card makers have released them but then some people will release 1.5GB versions of the 7950 too, like they released 1GB versions of the 6950. So the omission is fair and valid.
However I don't think it doesn't really matters, nVidia have made more of a effort this generation to insure they do not have the same issues they had with 40nm, they'll most likely go large again, and I think the gap in release between the two might be shorter this time.
I'm sure (or rather I hope) that when professional reviewers put out their numbers we'll see some benchmarks that showcase the difference the extra memory makes.
Lets not forget that the game engine can be as much at fault for poor performance at high resolution as can be the lack of vram.
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
They ought to have just kept on using the 5870 shroud, that thing was so much nicer than the HD 6000s / 7000s shrouds.
eyefinity 3 screens and such then a 3gb card makes more sense and need to provide the performance there.
1920x1080 then todays cards works well enough for.
what typically happens is, do the card and the configuration you use it for make a difference with the new card or not?
is that difference noticeable for you or not?
it not, then the new card isnt worth it.
benchmarks aside, but if the results dosnt gets noticed in your machine, why buy new then?
4670k 4.6ghz 1.22v watercooled CPU/GPU - Asus Z87-A - 290 1155mhz/1250mhz - Kingston Hyper Blu 8gb -crucial 128gb ssd - EyeFunity 5040x1050 120hz - CM atcs840 - Corsair 750w -sennheiser hd600 headphones - Asus essence stx - G400 and steelseries 6v2 -windows 8 Pro 64bit Best OS used - - 9500p 3dmark11(one of the 26% that isnt confused on xtreme forums)
Was read a bit the beyond3D forum, and one have see something interesting... 2x 6 Pin = 7950 ?
About the red pcb .. well dont take too much care about it, thoses are AMD cards, surely HIS, MSI, etc will have their own black pcb for the retail cards. ( simply AMD/ATI made by AMD/ATI are always red pcb )
Last edited by Lanek; 12-21-2011 at 01:40 AM.
CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0
Weird that people are disappointed its pretty good performance IMO, its always been like this.
4870=<GTX 280 Link
5870=<GTX 480 Link
6970=<GTX 580 Link
7970=<GTX 780/790 "Which ever one has 1500 cores"
AMD has not done a big daddy GPU for quite some time, they rather go with the dual GPU route which is a super easy with smaller cores its more about mm2 than freq.
EDIT: Things like GTX285, 4890, 6930, etc do not matter since they are freaks and mutants :P
Last edited by ajaidev; 12-21-2011 at 02:09 AM.
Coming Soon
Bookmarks