cinebench 11.5

[FlanK3r]

btw, maybe can help added new info in format:

CPU, batch(series), cooling, screenshot

example: FX 8150, 1140DPM, watter, SCREENSHOT or link to screenshot

[ReKcOlNu]

Maybe something like this? Anything else??

    Name                  Score  CPU                   CPU MHz  NB MHz  Cooling  Ram MHz     Timings        OS       Mobo        ScreenShot
001 FlanK3r /999          19.36  X8 FX-8450 (1140DPM)  5432     4200    H20      DDR3 @ 866  9-9-9-9-24-1T  Win7-64  Asus CF VI  n/a
002 VoodooProphetII /328  10.45  X6 1090T              6026     2400    LN2      DDR3 @ 800  9-9-9-9-24-1T  Win7-64  Asus CF IV  002

Notice: Above is FAKE DATA, For testing only!

[FlanK3r]

yes, excelent!Lol, me with 19.36 in R11.5

[Daveburt714]

WOW!!!! Magical score on that 8450 FlanK3r...
I knew you had connections, but I didn't think you had access to future chips!

J/K ReKcOlNu, I know it was just a demo, but it would be nice to have such info. If your up for all the work involved.

[Tomasis]

hehe

[demonkevy666]

anyone try setting AOD/taskmanger to realtime priority I'm getting different scores lol

7.04 normal set in taskmanger.
7.14 very high in taskmanger
7.34 realtime set in AOD. it's scarey cause you only see it finish lol

all runs done at 4.4ghz.

[FlanK3r]

yes, priority make sense, sometimes more, sometimes not big differences.

[Daveburt714]

Yes, same for me about L2. One run is 18k, other run - 48k or whatever it was.

Hey Infra, I know this is a little OT for this thread, but I was testing some new mem tonight and saw the same wierdness with L2 read in AIDA64...
It actually distracted me from my mem clocks for awhile. My instinct suggested it was realated to the HTRef clock (but it wasn't)!
Anyway, I think I've figured it out!
I was getting an L2 read ~17k again. With just a slight bump on Vcore (.0125v) it jumped back up to 45k...
If you see that happen again would you mind trying it (bumping Vcore) and see if it has the same effect on your rig?

Just thought I'd throw it out there for anyone else who may experience it.
I haven't tested to see if it has any real effect on performance or not, it just makes me feel better....

[BeepBeep2]

That's odd. I did not experience any of that with my C4F. Maybe it has something to do with different straps? (internal latency in NB) Freezing at the very last row of squares or even the very last square sounds familiar. How annoying!

It always seem the fastest runs that freeze at the very end.

Zeus, I think you are right...
This seems to happen with X6 as well when paired with the new microcode.

I'd been running 2040 CAS 6 but I noticed AIDA performance sucked really bad...I realized my results with Hypers from before were ~1000 MB/s better. Then sometimes, if my OC fails my machine won't boot anymore. I can't get it to boot at all, even after cycling ~20+ times. I cleared CMOS and started over, then I had that 1900 Mhz wall I had before...tried DOCP profile and drive strengths to no avail. Magically I was able to do 2000 again, after OC'ing with DOCP and stock NB multi/CPU multi. Now I'm at the same 2040 and realized my AIDA results are ~700 MB/s higher than they were before with same settings.

Now I have higher performance...without changing anything.

Oh, by the way ...just wanted to let everyone know I purchased an FX-8150 (not for performance, Counter-Strike:Source will inevitably run slower) but to play with. I'm selling my 1100T as well and hoping to get a second hand 1090T to replace it soon.

[m411b]

[demonkevy666]

found this on AMDzone
always wonder what is scored.

low clock Mangs cours 8 core

my guess would be this on clocking. TDP with out limits lol

3.0ghz one would score 6.98
4.0ghz would score 9.3
5.0ghz 11.6

did anyone notice mangs cours are prices about 40% higher then interlago's ? O_o ?

[Zeus]

Your math is incorrect, double the cpu speed does not mean double the score.

[Barr3l Rid3r]

[demonkevy666]

Your math is incorrect, double the cpu speed does not mean double the score.

[ReKcOlNu]

yes, excelent!Lol, me with 19.36 in R11.5

Maybe for CineBench 12.x, for now just gonna stay with this.

Heres FX only update,

   Name /Post#          Score  Cooling  CPU         MHz    ScreenShot
01 FlanK3r /647          9.57  LN2      X8 FX-8120  5885   01
02 Dumo /461             8.85  1-Stage  X8 FX-8150  5418   02
03 Daveburt714 /582      8.84  H20      X8 FX-8120  5389   03
04 equinox1 /445         8.72  H20      X8 FX-8120  5331   04
05 krjalone /556         8.65  H20      X8 FX-8150  5310   05
06 Zeus /550             8.60  H20      X8 FX-8120  5250   06
07 I.nfraR.ed /621       8.57  H20      X8 FX-8150  5226   07
08 Asmola /618           8.50  H20      X8 FX-8150  5168   08
09 wez /530              8.45  H20      X8 FX-8120  5140   09
10 El Gappo /411         8.34  AIR      X8 FX-8150  5090   10
11 Barr3l Rid3r /638     8.31  -        X8 FX-8120  5060   11
12 blossa /620           8.26  AIR      X8 FX-8150  5051   12
13 Particle /511         8.24  DICE     X8 FX-8120  5235   13
14 PatRaceTin /646       8.23  H20      X8 FX-8120  5033   14
15 PolRoger /515         8.18  AIR      X8 FX-8150  5017   15
16 charged3800z24 /512   8.16  H20      X8 FX-8120  5017   16
17 sandlewood /500       7.55  -        X8 FX-8150  4823   17
18 Baam /486             6.99  -        X8 FX-8120  4275   18
19 gOtVoltage /521       6.14  H20      X6 FX-6100  5001   19
20 m411b /635            6.12  -        X6 FX-6100  5003   20
21 The Stilt /510        4.29  AIR      X4 FX-4100  5201   21

[PatRaceTin]

bah
i got high volt 8120 need 1.60V @ 5.0GHz

[FlanK3r]

some rersults are really nice, I cant not reach 1.45V in R11.5 ...So....5GHz R11.5 is only dream for me

[Zeus]

Rolling your eyes cause it's not what you wanted to hear? Sorry but there's no lineair scaling in CB 11.5.

[demonkevy666]

Rolling your eyes cause it's not what you wanted to hear? Sorry but there's no lineair scaling in CB 11.5.

no because, your being a jacka$$
that was theoretical 4.0ghz 8 core manugs cours. -_-

[Zeus]

So because it's a different cpu the scaling of CB score suddenly is lineair and i am a jacka$$? Interesting.

[PatRaceTin]

FX-8120 (default voltage = 1.3875V)

Batch 1141GPM (not really good)

Normal Water Cooling

[FlanK3r]

I think, its maybe average chip, not bad...

Here is my new result:
AMD FX-8120 125W, 1140EPM, LN2 cooling (NB and RAM was not optimized), old Crosshair IV Extreem board

[Zeus]

Working on efficiency.



8 points at 4.85G doesn't looks too bad imho.

Now i only need some cold weather...

[ReKcOlNu]

Working on efficiency.

8 points at 4.85G doesn't looks too bad imho.

Now i only need some cold weather...

I have you listed for a 8150 also at post #602, screen shot here, but post doesn't exist, did you delete it Or did I screw up somewhere?

[Zeus]

No i did not delete anything afaik. Just delete the 8.12 of your chart and keep my best FX8150 result. (8.60) I also have a 8.62 result but it doesn't get me a place up so leave the 8.60 result please.