MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 1198

Thread: AMD "Piledriver" refresh of Zambezi - info, speculations, test, fans

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by Smartidiot89 View Post
    Yepp, and I honestly don't think AMD will bother to "fix" Bulldozer. They will most likely wait for Piledriver.
    First of all GF should fix his manufacturing tech. It would solve some major problems regarding Bulldozer.

    90 nm SOI:
    65 nm SOI:
    45 nm SOI:
    32 nm SOI:

    so far...
    -

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,730
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
    First of all GF should fix his manufacturing tech. It would solve some major problems regarding Bulldozer.

    90 nm SOI:
    65 nm SOI:
    45 nm SOI:
    32 nm SOI:

    so far...
    Umhh...you're looking at the end result ( CPU performance ) and blaming only one factor that contributes to that performance : process.
    Alongside process, performance and performance/watt is dependent on architecture and circuit design.

    I really doubt BD is perfect uarch and implementation wise and only the process is to blame. If we would have someone from GF here, I'm sure he'd say not so nice things about AMD competence in CPU design.
    Quote Originally Posted by Heinz Guderian View Post
    There are no desperate situations, there are only desperate people.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by savantu View Post
    Umhh...you're looking at the end result ( CPU performance ) and blaming only one factor that contributes to that performance : process.
    Alongside process, performance and performance/watt is dependent on architecture and circuit design.

    I really doubt BD is perfect uarch and implementation wise and only the process is to blame. If we would have someone from GF here, I'm sure he'd say not so nice things about AMD competence in CPU design.
    Agree or not but the main problem is the process tech. Nobody said that BD is perfect uarch anyway.

    If you don't believe it then just take a look at Llano CPU cores. Despite of the 32nm process it can't reach the previous very similar uarch clocks even with overclocking.



    At this moment the scaling of 32nm is worse than the latest 45nm one.
    -

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Quote Originally Posted by Oliverda View Post
    First of all GF should fix his manufacturing tech. It would solve some major problems regarding Bulldozer.

    90 nm SOI:
    65 nm SOI:
    45 nm SOI:
    32 nm SOI:

    so far...
    Fixing the manufacturing process is only half the story as others have said. Bulldozer is tweaked for the current state 32nm is in, getting improvements will require a new stepping/revision. There is a new stepping coming apparently so these "fixes" should be there as well.
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •