Results 1 to 25 of 733

Thread: AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer finally tested

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    577
    What I don't understand is that clearly the BD is good for multi-threaded performance such as possibly the server environment. Why release current chips with this poor leakage and clocks, why not just release the server first (where the chip is apparently designed for) then after another respin, then launch the desktop Zambezi later with better power/clocks? If you miss desired clocks by 30%, why release it early and have everyone talk about it really bad. Why not just be straight forward and say that the B2 silicon has issues and they are going to do respin?
    --Intel i5 3570k 4.4ghz (stock volts) - Corsair H100 - 6970 UL XFX 2GB - - Asrock Z77 Professional - 16GB Gskill 1866mhz - 2x90GB Agility 3 - WD640GB - 2xWD320GB - 2TB Samsung Spinpoint F4 - Audigy-- --NZXT Phantom - Samsung SATA DVD--(old systems Intel E8400 Wolfdale/Asus P45, AMD965BEC3 790X, Antec 180, Sapphire 4870 X2 (dead twice))

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    210
    Quote Originally Posted by Stukov View Post
    What I don't understand is that clearly the BD is good for multi-threaded performance such as possibly the server environment. Why release current chips with this poor leakage and clocks, why not just release the server first (where the chip is apparently designed for) then after another respin, then launch the desktop Zambezi later with better power/clocks? If you miss desired clocks by 30%, why release it early and have everyone talk about it really bad. Why not just be straight forward and say that the B2 silicon has issues and they are going to do respin?
    I asked myself the same. It looks strange, especially when there is a B3 revision coming out shortly, too.
    Only explanation to me is money. Maybe AMD need the cash-flow and/or they wanted to launch previously to SandyE, because the reviews would have been even worse, which would force them to reduce prices@launch even more.

    Anybody with another idea?

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    North Queensland Australia
    Posts
    1,445
    Quote Originally Posted by Stukov View Post
    What I don't understand is that clearly the BD is good for multi-threaded performance such as possibly the server environment. Why release current chips with this poor leakage and clocks, why not just release the server first (where the chip is apparently designed for) then after another respin, then launch the desktop Zambezi later with better power/clocks? If you miss desired clocks by 30%, why release it early and have everyone talk about it really bad. Why not just be straight forward and say that the B2 silicon has issues and they are going to do respin?
    Well technically they didn't release BD early, they released it late. Very late.

    -PB
    -Project Sakura-
    Intel i7 860 @ 4.0Ghz, Asus Maximus III Formula, 8GB G-Skill Ripjaws X F3 (@ 1600Mhz), 2x GTX 295 Quad SLI
    2x 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 RAID 0, OCZ ZX 1000W, NZXT Phantom (Pink), Dell SX2210T Touch Screen, Windows 8.1 Pro

    Koolance RP-401X2 1.1 (w/ Swiftech MCP35X), XSPC EX420, XSPC X-Flow 240, DT Sniper, EK-FC 295s (w/ RAM Blocks), Enzotech M3F Mosfet+NB/SB

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •