Page 21 of 30 FirstFirst ... 1118192021222324 ... LastLast
Results 501 to 525 of 733

Thread: AMD FX-8150 Bulldozer finally tested

  1. #501
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,554
    Quote Originally Posted by Monstru View Post
    What a surprise...our results were 100% accurate (...again), the BIOS version was good, the silicone version was good, and the numbers that other got were exactly the same as anybody else.... Or, as Vr-Zone said...
    That doesn't make your testing practices any less questionable. They just aren't very representative of real world performance.

    It also looks like Hardware Canucks used a video card that is about as fast as the almost three year old GTX280 that they used in their sandy bridge review and a bunch of canned benchmarks in their Bulldozer review.

    I do have to admit that the gaming performance being about on par with yorkfield is a bit of a surprise.
    Last edited by BababooeyHTJ; 10-12-2011 at 01:57 AM.

  2. #502
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    831
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    i thought you said you had one when you posted that about beating the 2600K and 990x? were you just speaking from opinion?
    I had BD Early ES but i anticipated bit more from later revisions.

    ::: Desktop's - Intel *** Intel 2
    2 x Xeon E5-2687W *** Intel i7 3930k
    EVGA SR-X *** Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    96Gb (12x8Gb) G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2400MHz 10-12-12-2N *** 32Gb (8x4Gb) G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2666 10-12-12-2N
    3 x Zotac GTX 680 4Gb + EK-FC680 GTX Acetal *** 3 x EVGA GeForce GTX780 + EK Titan XXL Edition waterblocks.
    OCZ RevoDrive 3 x4 960Gb *** 4 x Samsung 840 Pro 512Gb
    Avermedia LiveGamer HD capture card
    Caselabs TX10-D
    14 x 4 TB WD RE4 in RAID10+2Spare
    4 x Corsair AX1200

    ::: Basement DataCenter :::
    [*] Fibreoptic connection from operators core network
    [*] Dell PowerConnect 2848 Ethernet Switch [*] Network Security Devices by Cisco
    [*] Dell EqualLogic PS6500E 96Tb iSCSI SAN (40 2Tb Drives + 8 Spare Drives, Raid10+Spare Configuration, 40Tb fail safe storage)
    [*] Additional SAN machines with FusionIO ioDrive Octal's (4 total Octals).
    [*] 10 x Dual Xeon X5680, 12Gb DDR3, 2x100Gb Vertex 2 Pro Raid1 [*] 4 x Quad Xeon E7-4870, 96Gb DDR3, 2x100Gb Vertex 2 Pro Raid1

    [*] Monster UPS unit incase power grid failure backed up by diesel powered generator.

  3. #503
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    IRAN
    Posts
    92


    LooL AMD Is Down




    ONly INTEL

    AMD BD FX = Intel Corei5 Not Corei7
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	t6.png 
Views:	1403 
Size:	19.6 KB 
ID:	121185  
    Last edited by BHD; 10-12-2011 at 03:12 AM.

    PERSIAN GULF

  4. #504
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Quote Originally Posted by rintamarotta View Post
    I had BD Early ES but i anticipated bit more from later revisions.
    I don't blieve you had anything, sorry.
    So many people lied, so many people built the hype, so many told us to wait and that all will be well, where are these people today????????

  5. #505
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Romania, lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,707
    Quote Originally Posted by Hondacity View Post
    You're a legend to us Monstru, breaking rules
    Please, somebody bookmark this thread, for the next time we publish a preview (probably AMD's next VGA generation )
    Weissbier - breakfast of champions



  6. #506
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    353
    It is true that we have to wait for HD7000 series until Q1 2012?
    i5 2500K (L041C124) @ 5GHz + Scythe Mugen 2 rev. B | ASRock P67 Extreme4 B3 UEFI L3.19 | ADATA 2x4GB DDR3 1600 | MSI Radeon RX 470 4GB | 2x Crucial m4 64GB SSD RAID 0, Seagate 7200.12 500GB, Samsung F4 EG 2TB | 24" HP LP2475w | EVGA SuperNOVA G2 750W | Fractal Design Define R3 | Windows 10 64 bit

  7. #507
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    4,308
    Shame it turned out like this, BD was really important for AMD and I was looking forward to possibly update to such rig but with these numbers in my hand I'll have to rethink my plans.
    Intel? Core i5-4670K @ 4.3 GHz | ASRock Extreme6 Z87 | G.Skill Sniper 2x8GB @ DDR4-1866 CL9 | Gigabyte GTX 970 OC Windforce 3x | Super Flower Titanium 1000W | ViewSonic VX2268wm 120Hz LCD | Phanteks PH-TC14PE | Logitech MX-518 | Win 7 x64 Professional | Samsung 850 EVO & 840 Pro SSDs

    If all people would share opinions in an objective manner, the world would be a friendlier place

  8. #508
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Quote Originally Posted by BababooeyHTJ View Post
    It also looks like Hardware Canucks used a video card that is about as fast as the almost three year old GTX280 that they used in their sandy bridge review and a bunch of canned benchmarks in their Bulldozer review.
    So what? For CPU testing, canned benchmarks are a MUST in order to achieve accurate repeatability. If not, the results are all over the place. In GPU testing, walkthroughs can be done since the entire point is finding where the GPU bottleneck is.

    If you can prove to me that another method is as accurate, I'm all ears.

  9. #509
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,079
    So in the end BD has turned out to be a fiasco.
    Very bad news for everybody

  10. #510
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by El Maño View Post
    So in the end BD has turned out to be a fiasco.
    Very bad news for everybody
    Not for everyone.

    For example for several server workloads the performance has increased nicely [yay for them]

    And we have all learned a few things about floating point demand in benchmarks.

    Much more can be gleaned in the coming weeks as we examine further to see were the pain points were.
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  11. #511
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Yes, but powerconsumption is through the roof... Wonder if they really can go with that when perf/W is essential in server space... or they have unloaded all "bad" cores in the consumer market and the good (aka lower voltage binned) get in the server channle.

  12. #512
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by nn_step View Post
    Not for everyone.

    For example for several server workloads the performance has increased nicely [yay for them]

    And we have all learned a few things about floating point demand in benchmarks.

    Much more can be gleaned in the coming weeks as we examine further to see were the pain points were.

    And the extreme OC community seems to have a new toy to play with. Those LN results are impressive.
    But it seems to be under performing for an enthusiast or gaming rig while too expensive for a low budget PC.

    Piledriver under Windows 8 on the other hand looks really promising if the people at MS improve thread managing as they said they would.

  13. #513
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    225
    Quote Originally Posted by SKYMTL View Post
    So what? For CPU testing, canned benchmarks are a MUST in order to achieve accurate repeatability. If not, the results are all over the place. In GPU testing, walkthroughs can be done since the entire point is finding where the GPU bottleneck is.

    If you can prove to me that another method is as accurate, I'm all ears.
    Why don't you do a review of say, the i7 920 vs the 940 BE in games now. Put that "future proofing" bull to the test? Oh, I do mean with todays fastest graphics cards at high resolution and maximum settings btw.

    When those two cpu's were released the fastest card was what, the 280? So now there are cards out there more 2x-3x faster. By your logic there is no way that the 940 BE can compete with the 920 at max settings these days with such a faster card right? I mean, what's the difference between that back then and say, sli gtx 280's? You use that as an excuse to show garbage benchmarks that have no bearing on the reality. Low resolution benchmarks are a pure lie.

  14. #514
    YouTube Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Klaatu barada nikto
    Posts
    17,574
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    Yes, but powerconsumption is through the roof... Wonder if they really can go with that when perf/W is essential in server space... or they have unloaded all "bad" cores in the consumer market and the good (aka lower voltage binned) get in the server channle.
    Performance/ watt for those benchmarks is better than i7 [Not much but it is impressive considering]

    Quote Originally Posted by El Maño View Post
    And the extreme OC community seems to have a new toy to play with. Those LN results are impressive.
    But it seems to be under performing for an enthusiast or gaming rig while too expensive for a low budget PC.

    Piledriver under Windows 8 on the other hand looks really promising if the people at MS improve thread managing as they said they would.
    The real question for them is what is the absolute upper limit on these things
    Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
    The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
    http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
    Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was

  15. #515
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    173
    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR View Post
    Whelp, this is thing is possibly one of the worst releases this year. If current reviews are an indication.

    At least we know why JF-AMD has been absent! LOL!
    I am not sure he will ever show up with that nickname again, however, one reason he isn't 'here' is because of the quiet period most likely.

  16. #516
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by Kobaltrock View Post
    quiet period most likely.
    I think quiet period is the politically correct term to use where public discussion is concerned, internally there's probably a much more graphic term being thrown around.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  17. #517
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    816
    Noticed that I am quiet too ;-)

    I think everybody needs to cool down a little. JF-AMD is like me, passionate about what he does, if you don't believe into it, you can't put so much energy into making those Processors.
    Green or Blue, we are all Geeks excited and just never forget, those Processors are the most complex machines build by human kind, at the smallest scale.

    Not one man can claim to make any of this by himself, those are massive undertaking, the size of those transistors are mind blowing.

    so, yes, there is competition, and yes, this architecture is not the happiest , but at least show some respect to the men who dedicated their life to build such complex machines.
    It is ok to make a little fun of it, but please respect the men behind it, and get some perceptive, see how large is the achievement of putting something like Bulldozer together.

    So, I am respectfully asking all of you to stay gentlemen ... No personal attack is ever acceptable.

    Thanks all , stay on the high road!

    Francois Piednoel
    DrWho, The last of the time lords, setting up the Clock.

  18. #518
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,445
    Quote Originally Posted by Drwho? View Post
    Noticed that I am quiet too ;-)

    I think everybody needs to cool down a little. JF-AMD is like me, passionate about what he does, if you don't believe into it, you can't put so much energy into making those Processors.
    Green or Blue, we are all Geeks excited and just never forget, those Processors are the most complex machines build by human kind, at the smallest scale.

    Not one man can claim to make any of this by himself, those are massive undertaking, the size of those transistors are mind blowing.

    so, yes, there is competition, and yes, this architecture is not the happiest , but at least show some respect to the men who dedicated their life to build such complex machines.
    It is ok to make a little fun of it, but please respect the men behind it, and get some perceptive, see how large is the achievement of putting something like Bulldozer together.

    So, I am respectfully asking all of you to stay gentlemen ... No personal attack is ever acceptable.

    Thanks all , stay on the high road!

    Francois Piednoel

    ....you have surprised me by your logic and grace.....well done/said!
    [MOBO] Asus CrossHair Formula 5 AM3+
    [GPU] ATI 6970 x2 Crossfire 2Gb
    [RAM] G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1600
    [CPU] AMD FX-8120 @ 4.8 ghz
    [COOLER] XSPC Rasa 750 RS360 WaterCooling
    [OS] Windows 8 x64 Enterprise
    [HDD] OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD
    [AUDIO] Logitech S-220 17 Watts 2.1

  19. #519
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    Yes, but powerconsumption is through the roof... Wonder if they really can go with that when perf/W is essential in server space... or they have unloaded all "bad" cores in the consumer market and the good (aka lower voltage binned) get in the server channle.
    Quite possible. The Opteron 4284s that I am looking at are 8c @ 3ghz with 3.7ghz turbo that sit in the 75w space.

    Course I wont be able to play with any of those until my deployment is over sometime next spring

    Edit: Course Asus can't pull the L1N64-WS fiasco too...
    Last edited by Hawkeye4077; 10-12-2011 at 04:45 PM.
    ASRock X399 Fatal1ty
    1950x Threadripper
    32gb DDR4
    GTX 1070
    __________________________________________________ ____

  20. #520
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    225
    Yeah no offence but you can tell more about a man by what they say about their opponents in defeat, not victory. If BD stomped all over SB, Drwho and a whole bunch of intel fanboys would never be seen on the forums again.

  21. #521
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by Drwho? View Post
    Noticed that I am quiet too ;-)

    I think everybody needs to cool down a little. JF-AMD is like me, passionate about what he does, if you don't believe into it, you can't put so much energy into making those Processors.
    Green or Blue, we are all Geeks excited and just never forget, those Processors are the most complex machines build by human kind, at the smallest scale.

    Not one man can claim to make any of this by himself, those are massive undertaking, the size of those transistors are mind blowing.

    so, yes, there is competition, and yes, this architecture is not the happiest , but at least show some respect to the men who dedicated their life to build such complex machines.
    It is ok to make a little fun of it, but please respect the men behind it, and get some perceptive, see how large is the achievement of putting something like Bulldozer together.

    So, I am respectfully asking all of you to stay gentlemen ... No personal attack is ever acceptable.

    Thanks all , stay on the high road!

    Francois Piednoel
    Agreed. 2 billion transistors, thats just mind blowing thinking what it takes to design such a complex chip.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

  22. #522
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Right now noone is attacking him personaly or anyone at all, but people want a clarification why they got feed plain wrong information (aka lies). If your company would pulled a similar thing and you would have claimed variouse things that where plain wrong you would have to expect the same head wind as your counterpart.

  23. #523
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    pacific NW usa
    Posts
    2,764
    Quote Originally Posted by Drwho? View Post
    Noticed that I am quiet too ;-)

    I think everybody needs to cool down a little. JF-AMD is like me, passionate about what he does, if you don't believe into it, you can't put so much energy into making those Processors.
    Green or Blue, we are all Geeks excited and just never forget, those Processors are the most complex machines build by human kind, at the smallest scale.

    Not one man can claim to make any of this by himself, those are massive undertaking, the size of those transistors are mind blowing.

    so, yes, there is competition, and yes, this architecture is not the happiest , but at least show some respect to the men who dedicated their life to build such complex machines.
    It is ok to make a little fun of it, but please respect the men behind it, and get some perceptive, see how large is the achievement of putting something like Bulldozer together.

    So, I am respectfully asking all of you to stay gentlemen ... No personal attack is ever acceptable.

    Thanks all , stay on the high road!

    Francois Piednoel
    well said,i think many of us enthusiasts forget how mindbottling cpu arch is, because of our common use and handling of the cpu itself
    it's like it loses its mystery and mistic to us it's just a thing we take out of a box and hold in our hand until we install it and bench/test/game with it.
    we forget deep inside theres a whole full functioning microscopic world in there with billions and billions of things going on.

    and kudos for you statement about JF-AMD,there absolutely no reason for anyone to personally attack him or anyone
    Last edited by radaja; 10-12-2011 at 04:59 PM.
    _________________________________________________
    ............................ImAcOmPuTeRsPoNgE............................
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    MY HEATWARE 76-0-0

  24. #524
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    393
    Quote Originally Posted by rintamarotta;4970653[B
    ]It still has best multi-threaded performance[/B] but crappy at single-threaded performance.

    Oh yeah, im bit too optimistic at times
    Are you blind? Have you even looked at the benches? Even in heavily multi-threaded scenarios, it loses to a quad core 2600k. It won't even perform anywhere near hexa core Intel CPUs like the i7 970 or the upcoming SB-E Hexas.

    41695.png

    41694.png

    You're right about one thing, BD plain sucks in single threaded scenarios.

  25. #525
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Santos(São Paulo), Brasil.
    Posts
    202
    how can 2 billions transistors be so SLOW?
    sad, very sad day

    I really hope that piledriver is not that bad...

    Still don't understand why does movieman said that AMD have a winner. This is not a winner in any way you look at it

    I'm sad.
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055T @ 4009MHz
    NB @ 2673MHz
    Corsair H50 + Scythe Ultra Kaze 3k
    Gigabyte GA-MA790X-UD4P
    2X2GB DDR2 OCZ Gold
    XFX Radeon HD5850 XXX @ 900MHz Core
    OCZ Agility2 60GB
    2x500GB HDD WD Blue
    250GB Samsung
    SevenTeam 620W PAF
    CoolerMaster CM690

Page 21 of 30 FirstFirst ... 1118192021222324 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •