MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 560

Thread: AMD Bulldozer Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Aussie God
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Copenhagen, Denmark
    Posts
    4,596
    Guys, dont compare SPI across platforms, and please, do not mock that benchmark, after all, this is xtremesystems.org, and it is a highly valued benchmark, due it still isnt imune to tweaking, it IS possible to make a DIFFERENCE on the result, from skills.... So, the benchmark remains!
    That you cannot compare AMD and INTEL on SPI, I fully agree.... But dont you dare saying it is a shifty benchmark, it is still one of the best!

    Furthermore, I hope some of you reading this, will think about apologizing to LAB501 for all the BS stated about their testing method, and accuracy in their results!

    Quote Originally Posted by Sparky View Post
    Because superpi is virtually worthless anyway. You know this. This has been beaten to death ad nauseum so many times you have to know this

    But everything else? Meh

    I'm still trying to make sense of what I'm seeing here, and what Dave said. I just don't get it, I've got to be missing something.
    The part of which he received a 2P or 4P Interlagos from AMD, and is happy as it contributes to WGC, I dont blame him one bit.
    Last edited by M.Beier; 10-11-2011 at 07:16 PM.
    Competition ranking;
    2005; Netbyte, Karise/Denmark #1 @ PiFast
    2008; AOCM II, Minfeld/Germany #2 @ 01SE/AM3/8M (w. Oliver)
    2009; AMD-OC, Viborg/Denmark #2 @ max freq Gigabyte TweaKING, Paris/France #4 @ 32M/01SE (w. Vanovich)
    2010: Gigabyte P55, Hamburg/Germany #6 @ wprime 1024/SPI 1M (w. THC) AOCM III, Minfeld/Germany #6 @ 01SE/AM3/1M/8M (w. NeoForce)

    Spectating;
    2010; GOOC 2010 Many thanks to Gigabyte!


  2. #2
    Champion
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Romania, lab501.ro
    Posts
    1,707
    Quote Originally Posted by M.Beier View Post

    Furthermore, I hope some of you reading this, will think about apologizing to LAB501 for all the BS stated about their testing method, and accuracy in their results!


    Meh, no need for that, this is not the first, nor the last time this happens. The problem is that in this case I am actually sorry because we are right. I have been using Athlon64 back in the day and I used to look up to the FX models so much. Those were like a dream for all pc users back in the day (except for die hard intel fanboys, of course ). Now, to see the FX name used like this....it's like something is breaking inside of me
    Weissbier - breakfast of champions



  3. #3
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    Quote Originally Posted by Monstru View Post
    Meh, no need for that, this is not the first, nor the last time this happens. The problem is that in this case I am actually sorry because we are right. I have been using Athlon64 back in the day and I used to look up to the FX models so much. Those were like a dream for all pc users back in the day (except for die hard intel fanboys, of course ). Now, to see the FX name used like this....it's like something is breaking inside of me
    The QuadFX wasn't terribly exciting either.
    One hundred years from now It won't matter
    What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
    How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
    -- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    101
    I cannot understand how come they doubled transistors to get less performance?
    Any linpack benchmark that I missed in all the reviews?

    WTF!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •