Yeah I was thinking about how many loops we'd need to standardize it to, but since this isn't really a stability club (is it?) less should be sufficient so long as it's consistent. You can see in my run it's got about 0.0357 GFLOPS variance between the highest and lowest loops. Also 20 loops with 12GB of ram will take me until next year to complete, perhaps that's your grand plan!
I dunno, say 10 loops? That should be more than enough to establish efficiency and basic stability, although I must say I've always got lower GFLOPS when slightly unstable.
I will try running with less as a test, but I shouldn't be excluded for running 12GB
We can always have installed ram as a delimiter and have 6/12GB categories.
Sorry to hear about the 980X mate, hope you get a good one in return. Intel are very prompt in their turn around time for a claim and this is one of those situations where it cannot be determined exactly what happened but it certainly wasn't abuse on your behalf.
Originally Posted by CryptiK
Yeah I was thinking about how many loops we'd need to standardize it to, but since this isn't really a stability club (is it?) less should be sufficient so long as it's consistent. You can see in my run it's got about 0.0357 GFLOPS variance between the highest and lowest loops. Also 20 loops with 12GB of ram will take me until next year to complete, perhaps that's your grand plan!
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks