I didn't mean the performance of an i7 990x - just in general, they have the fastest low-, mid- and high-end CPU and as all of you understand that's why they rule the market and can have the highest price, so in the end, real performance controls the market.
(Btw, you should start looking at ESLs commercials, it's all bout Intels extreme stuff, but maybe that's because of the names of their tournaments)
--
I've a question, am I the only one that think it's embarrassing/funny/weird that they compare there new top model against a 1,5 year old processor that probably performs worse then the 2500k/2600k in the comparing games. Imo that make this (http://tof.canardpc.com/view/a53a68e...1068e8af28.jpg) slide worthless because if they would have compared it with the better performing 2500/2600 the slide would have looked very very different...
EDIT:
And why you to think the situation looks like that?
The market (Intel) needs competition in stuff that matters to customers!
Bookmarks