
Originally Posted by
LoneWolf
Without going into the Asrock bit (I think anything that needs to be discussed so far by myself and others already has been)
If you want to go Gigabyte, I'd ask yourself if you need the UD7, or if the UD5 or UD4 will do. Double-check the feature list. The big reason to have the UD7 is if you need the nVidia NF200 chip because you're loading your system down with cards, going TRI-SLI (or two dual-GPU cards). Other uses might be if you really need dual-NICs (most of us don't, though there are exceptions). If you don't need those things, the UD5, or maybe even the UD4, will be a great choice at a lesser price.
The ASUS P8Z68-V Pro doesn't appear to be a bad board. I don't know if it's built quite as heavily as the Gigabyte (FWIW, my Extreme 4 Gen3 wasn't, either, and aside from its quirks, it did what it did okay), and there have been some people who have complained of it being picky about RAM. However, it has the advantages of an Intel NIC, and a UEFI BIOS, and if you have to have UEFI, ASUS is probably the most advanced at this point. If you have to have black, the Maximus IV may be it for you; my only gripe was their poor placement of the USB3 header, done much better on the Asrock and Gigabyte boards, and that ASUS really doesn't have an incredible support reputation either (when their stuff works, it works great, when it doesn't, support is inconsistent).
I think at this point there really is no one perfect Z68 board. The Extreme 7 Gen3 comes closest in terms of layout, features, and design IMO, but having had the experience I did, I'd probably wait for another BIOS revision or two, and if reports come back good, I'd probably look on it as the winner.
Bookmarks