did you mod it to 166fsb or 200fsb?
i thougt the dfi boards dont need the mod at all?
did you mod it to 166fsb or 200fsb?
i thougt the dfi boards dont need the mod at all?
SAE, those are some crazy clocks - a thing of art with all that has to be done on this platform to achieve that. Reading this makes me want to jump back to NF2 for kicks and see what a DFI would do. I went through about 4-5 NF7-S's and they all worked like crap with my memory.
3700+ San Diego @ 1.7v
2x512 pc4000 Mushkin Redline @ 3.6v
MSI k8n neo2
x800xtpe
Mach 2 cooled
Superpi (1.4mod) --> 24.7 sec
3DMark '01 ---> 37.8k on stock x800xt (526/573)
It's determined by the bios (thx OSKAROriginally posted by saaya
did you mod it to 166fsb or 200fsb?
i thougt the dfi boards dont need the mod at all?) every way of modding it defaults to 200MHz. So just the ordinary 166MHz NF7 mod.
Who said the DFI don't need it!?It's been clear for quite some time there's improvements in usability with higher multipliers
Hehe. Yeah. Fact is, the DFIs don't perform like that everyday at same settings - nothing changed! Yep. So stay with what you have, is my advice, cause this way you'll stay calm, nice and enthusiastic...Originally posted by BMORIN
SAE, those are some crazy clocks - a thing of art with all that has to be done on this platform to achieve that. Reading this makes me want to jump back to NF2 for kicks and see what a DFI would do. I went through about 4-5 NF7-S's and they all worked like crap with my memory.(with DFI it could happen you'd get a nervous, unhappy, swearing pc user LOL)
I think you just described a NF7-S userOriginally posted by SAE
(with DFI it could happen you'd get a nervous, unhappy, swearing pc user LOL)
Originally posted by BMORIN
I think you just described a NF7-S user
I thought nf7-s users are all happy, satisfied people drooling about their stability![]()
166MHz romsip should be tighter in original bios releases, but those fellow modders out there did us many favoursOriginally posted by µnrealneo²
166 default ROMSIP = best.
Interestingly, Enduracell has used the same ROMSIP on all fsb's on the AN7, meaning you dont need the L12 mod to 166.
This is like going back in time really.![]()
I had L12 mods in place since August last year, being a Tbred owner.![]()
![]()
so you did this mod?
Only the 166MHz one![]()
congrats again m8!
ur ram is absolutely outstanding!
SAE...SAE...SAE...pushing the limits ever higher and higher...![]()
AMD
Hehe, thanks to both of ya
But as you know nothing's stable today![]()
No clue what bios to test now...
![]()
This is without L12 modd. But maybe L12 is good.. iwill test it when i have a new xp-m2600
Hehe... when it's cold outside, LV 's sitting there with his freezing rigOriginally posted by Lastviking
![]()
This is without L12 modd. But maybe L12 is good.. iwill test it when i have a new xp-m2600![]()
The shivering hands did the L12 mod.
do any of u know where is this alpha setting... located in wpcredit?
is it possible to change it in windows if any of u have try it?
Lastviking, ever tried to run 3dmark2k1 at those settings?
away & gone
Yeah. It's in WPCREDIT 32bit mode...Originally posted by tictac
do any of u know where is this alpha setting... located in wpcredit?
is it possible to change it in windows if any of u have try it?
Bus#0 Dev#0 Func#1 second colomn - offsets 94 to 97![]()
No chance to get it done... NF2 mem controller is not stable anymore at these kindsa clocks.Originally posted by mrlobber
Lastviking, ever tried to run 3dmark2k1 at those settings?
Well, your 264fsb is not too far eitherOriginally posted by SAE
No chance to get it done... NF2 mem controller is not stable anymore at these kindsa clocks.![]()
away & gone
but I already felt the limits there...Originally posted by mrlobber
Well, your 264fsb is not too far either![]()
I just completed a 3dmark at 11.5x266.95MHz. I just booted as usual at 254x11.5 and upped the clocks
And now it worked. Did not clock the card though - only 480-380 (my gaming settings, artifact free).
24088
My latest pifast results are like 45.80seconds. Screenies later![]()
Any chance of beating your current score if the card was clocked to your maximum levels?Originally posted by SAE
I just completed a 3dmark at 11.5x266.95MHz. I just booted as usual at 254x11.5 and upped the clocks
And now it worked. Did not clock the card though - only 480-380 (my gaming settings, artifact free).
24088
My latest pifast results are like 45.80seconds. Screenies later![]()
away & gone
Pfff... not even 270fsb
j/k outstanding job... now go and crush your 3dmark score
Would you plz run a PiFast while you're at it?![]()
lol... This forum requires that you wait 70 seconds between posts. Please try again in 8 seconds.
*phone rings*
Friend: Do you have a spare PSU lying around?
Me: No why?
Friend: My PSU just blew up, I think the second 8800GTX might have been too much for it to handle
Me: what PSU was that again?
Friend: Antec 480w
Me:........
Hey Garrett my friendOriginally posted by Garrett
Pfff... not even 270fsb
j/k outstanding job... now go and crush your 3dmark score
Would you plz run a PiFast while you're at it?![]()
I ran a pifaast already, but under win xp... first post
But under 2k I am around 45.8s :thumbsup:
@mrlobber
There's the chance, but I am not fully convinced. Dunno if the card/board are stable enough for that torture.
are u sure this is the address o9f that alpha table?Originally posted by SAE
Yeah. It's in WPCREDIT 32bit mode...
Bus#0 Dev#0 Func#1 second colomn - offsets 94 to 97![]()
i checj nf7s bios
they set it at:
3-0-0-0-3-3-0
is it possible to set it this tight?
why Abit set it too tight...nvm i will loosen it up
![]()
Last edited by tictac; 07-14-2004 at 09:38 PM.
Try to set WPCR to 32 bit mode and it will appear to ya more clearlyOriginally posted by tictac
are u sure this is the address o9f that alpha table?
i checj nf7s bios
they set it at:
3-0-0-0-3-3-0
is it possible to set it this tight?
why Abit set it too tight...nvm i will loosen it up
![]()
You'd have them all in one column.
Tightest on DFI boards are 0-0-3-3-0-0-3 IMO, and that's using 1-31 ROMSIP...
Bookmarks