Kind of hard to do when I don't even have that board anymore. Why do I need to get this score again when you don't even have proof that I could even steal it? Explain to me how I would "copy" it when my image is absolutely perfect while yours is degraded. I absolutely REFUSE to say I'm sorry because I am not at fault here, you seem to have something against me, and it is getting old. I do not appreciate being called a liar behind my back or even to my face.
Also, I checked post 121, FOUND HERE and it was edited by YOU on 7/20 at 10:23am. Who has the ability to edit your post, YOU DO. If a mod would have, it would have their name on it. Looking at the pic, it says e8400 in the CPUz screenshot, so I have no idea where you are getting this AMD from. When you say "to hide their lies", what are you referring to? Are you now saying that the admins/moderators on OCF are in on this conspiracy? If so, you are out of your damn mind.
Whatever you have against me, drop it. It will not be worth your time arguing. I will never apologize when I am not at fault and being accused of lying.
Everyone else that has posted proof that you can get times like that: Thank you, it is greatly appreciated.
Last edited by thideras; 07-25-2008 at 11:14 PM.
It is totally possible. With all due respect, I think I know quite a bit about SuperPi cheating, just ask the people I've helped in busting.
There is nothing strange about the time, it is fine for the given CPU speed. And why would anyone want to cheat a 4.66GHz time?? We have people running at close to 6 GHz here daily, there's no point in cheating an air speed.
You got a response from me, you got one from Kunaak. Anyone else? I'm sure I could get the staff of both XS and OCF to back me if you really need it...
I don't want to discourage anyone from trying to catch cheaters, far from it, but nothing here is amiss, it seems like you're just pressing the issue for your own satisfaction.
one word, sam
Sharp and harsh
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
maybe this thread can shed some more light on Sam/Tapakah that James is talking about
http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2326
I know, it's just harsh to be called out so blatantly :P
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
CPU:Q6600 G0 @ 3.825
Motherboard:Asus P5E X38
Memory:2x2GB OCZ Reapers DDR2 1066
Graphics Card:Asus 4850
Hard Drive:2xSegate 500gb 32MB Cache raid0
Power Supply:Xion 800W
Case:3DAurora
CPU cooling: D-tek Fuzion V2 (Quad insert removed)
GPU cooling: mcw60
Monitor:24" LG
I have never cheated a bench in my life, but I say if anybody is caught they should be banned forever from this site, and other websites should be warned, and given their info. They should also be blacklisted so that they can never do it again.
It would be a disgrace if somebody like that were to post a cheated bench and then receive goods or services from any of the companies based on that.
I would hope that the Admins here would come down HARD on somebody caught doing that. They could then be posted in the Hall of Shame for all to see, and be immortilized there forever.
Personally I would be ruthless if I ever caught somebody doing that.
Last edited by T_Flight; 12-17-2008 at 10:41 AM.
i5 3570k 4.2ghz 1.28v H100 cooled stable 24/7 | Asus Sabertooth Z77 TUF | 2x4GB 8GB Mushkin Blackline 998954 | GTX 680 2gb | 120GB OCZ Vertex 3/3TB Seagate | Enermax Platimax 850w | NZXT Switch 810 White | Windows 7 Ultimate | Samsung 40" LCD HDTV
A+ NET+ Linux+ MCP MCTS MCSA MCITP
World of Tanks WGLNA
CSGO ESEA
Heatware: MarcusFoX
Is MFT with SSD cheat? It looks like the new "hit"
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...&postcount=138
Here's a new multi-threaded Pi-program that I wrote.
Main Thread:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=221773
It's faster than SuperPi and PiFast. But I'm a little shaky on how to implement anti-cheat protection.
It already has some anti-cheat protection, but I'm no expert in cheating benchmarks so I have no idea how easy it can be cheated. So far, I haven't been able it cheat it myself using all the tactics I know.
Can someone try to cheat this? I'm interested in making it more solid.
For now, I know that the CPU frequency that it reports isn't always accurate and can probably be manipulated. I'm interested to see if there are other (bigger) problems that make it easy to cheat.
Main Machine:
AMD FX8350 @ stock --- 16 GB DDR3 @ 1333 MHz --- Asus M5A99FX Pro R2.0 --- 2.0 TB Seagate
Miscellaneous Workstations for Code-Testing:
Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.0 GHz --- 32 GB DDR3 @ 1866 MHz --- Asus Z87-Plus --- 1.5 TB (boot) --- 4 x 1 TB + 4 x 2 TB (swap)
Anyone know how this was possible???!
Validation Here
Hmm, the HT link speed seems suspicious. 3123MHz is going to a bit unstable. I doubt it's Prime stable.
For those who don't get it...
Old Shakespeare was a man of wit
And on his shirt he had some sh sh sh sh... Buttons
One day while walking though St Pauls
A lady grabbed him by the b b b b... Elbow
And said: AHA! You look like a man of pluck
Come upstairs and have a f f f f... Cup of tea
It might cost you a penny, it might cost you a bob
It all depends on the size of your kn kn kn kn... Cup.
Last edited by [XC] Oj101; 11-20-2009 at 04:33 AM.
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
Sometimes the reported HTT goes insane for a split second (this happens very rarely), pulling the HT link speed and CPU frequency up
--->TeamPURE<---
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
hey Kunaak! I remember you from gamefaqs.com back in the day!
what you mean like this , i did along time ago
http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=607370
some benchmarks like 3DMark should gather programs running in the background before start then after it is complete it should verify again.
Once you post your record online in the details it should show of all open programs in the back-ground and closed programs if any where running during bench.
Then they could go on further and if any cheat programs are detected they can disallow to post the result and a send an immediate letter for investigation (to their staff) to see if the record was really cheated
I know this is an old thread but I just noticed it today and your post.
Please don't!!!!
I cannot run 32m superpi mod vers (any mod ver including the xs) because of the anti cheat.
It thinks that most of my systems are cheating when I'm only trying to make a run at 32m for stability testing.
I have to run the original superpi.
It might be the diff's between my irq timing and my cpu timing, I don't know, I haven't tried it on an unmodded bios (pic timing mod).
But I really don't care about bench's lol, I just need the stability tests to run .
Anyways, leave the stability option alone in terms of cheat protection, add as much cheat protection as you want to the bench option.
Edit:
However, I supposed could do some messing around with the pic's, pic0 1 and apic timings to see if I can cheat your program later on...
If you wanted me to, not sure if I can get access to the apic multiplier in win7 though, haven't tried yet.
I don't mod those for cheating, I mod them for latency and hd controller timings (via chipsets I can mod the timings directly, other chips I have no idea how to so I mod the master timing).
Last edited by NEOAethyr; 02-02-2011 at 03:50 AM.
Faking a benchie is a lot like cheating in an online game. Same type of pathology.
CPU: Phenom II X4 940
HSF: Rocketfish POS
Mobo: DFI/Sapphire Pure 790X
RAM: Mushkin 8GB (4x2GB) DDR2 1066@400mhz (5-5-5-18)
HDD1: Velociraptor 150GB
HDD2/3: WD Caviar Blue 250GB/Seagate Barracuda 160GB
Optical: Pioneer 215D
Video: Asus 6950 2GB
Audio: X-Fi Fatality Professonal
Misc: Logitech G15/G5/Razer Piranha
Case/PSU: TT Dokker/TT Toughpower XT 775W
Monitor: Samsung Syncmaster BX2235
Drivers: Newest
OS: Win 7 Pro x64
Bookmarks