Well, intel prices its chipset higher and gives less.So theres that.Originally Posted by gurusan
Well, intel prices its chipset higher and gives less.So theres that.
Yeah, buying into intel is not cheap, but I give you points for attempted trolling.
Rebuilding server farm or making computer case of zambezi/interlagos boxes?
We will see, we will see
::: Desktop's - Intel *** Intel 2
2 x Xeon E5-2687W *** Intel i7 3930k
EVGA SR-X *** Asus Rampage IV Extreme
96Gb (12x8Gb) G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2400MHz 10-12-12-2N *** 32Gb (8x4Gb) G.Skill Trident X DDR3-2666 10-12-12-2N
3 x Zotac GTX 680 4Gb + EK-FC680 GTX Acetal *** 3 x EVGA GeForce GTX780 + EK Titan XXL Edition waterblocks.
OCZ RevoDrive 3 x4 960Gb *** 4 x Samsung 840 Pro 512Gb
Avermedia LiveGamer HD capture card
Caselabs TX10-D
14 x 4 TB WD RE4 in RAID10+2Spare
4 x Corsair AX1200
::: Basement DataCenter :::
[*] Fibreoptic connection from operators core network
[*] Dell PowerConnect 2848 Ethernet Switch [*] Network Security Devices by Cisco
[*] Dell EqualLogic PS6500E 96Tb iSCSI SAN (40 2Tb Drives + 8 Spare Drives, Raid10+Spare Configuration, 40Tb fail safe storage)
[*] Additional SAN machines with FusionIO ioDrive Octal's (4 total Octals).
[*] 10 x Dual Xeon X5680, 12Gb DDR3, 2x100Gb Vertex 2 Pro Raid1 [*] 4 x Quad Xeon E7-4870, 96Gb DDR3, 2x100Gb Vertex 2 Pro Raid1
[*] Monster UPS unit incase power grid failure backed up by diesel powered generator.
Da-AMDBOX CaseRebuilding server farm or making computer case of zambezi/interlagos boxes?
_________________________________________________
............................ImAcOmPuTeRsPoNgE............................
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
MY HEATWARE 76-0-0
Haha "It's a bit sweet"
That hole is to show the chip.I could put small plastic bag in those boxes, candy or screws would not get trough that hole
Think the hole is there because of protection from moisture.
Like on the regular AMD CPU packages.
i will be happy if top model use paper box and sell cheaper than metal box ....haha
Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
[history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K
If it's true I will regard this as one of reasons why zambezi delayed. Sell at 320$ would be shaking the market into bloody hell .
Im waiting for 2x FX 8xxxx and 1x FX6xxx (in first state), I have 7 Phenoms CPU, so I must to have more FX than Phenoms
Last edited by FlanK3r; 06-19-2011 at 12:13 AM.
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
I'm very sad and thoughtfu because BD was "near" to launch, and now it has been delayed to no official date
I hoped almost to know something in June, even if BD was not launched. Just to see if we're waiting something special...
I dont know nothing for sure
- BD will work on some am3 motherboards like asus/msi said?
- BD how much will be better than phenom II, core vs core?
- BD 2 will be on another socket.. am3+ will be supported only 1 year?
I'm thinking of selling my CH IV and buy an am3+ motherboard, but I don't know if getting a "medium range" mainboard and save money or buying a CH V ...
a CH V will be too expensive IMHO if BD will not be almost +30% better than phenom II, core vs core, and if AMD will not support and develope am3+ cpus next year..
-> sorry for my poor english but itsnt my 1st language
Last edited by liberato87; 06-19-2011 at 04:55 AM.
Quick recap.Maybe im gonna be helpful.
Yes BD should work on selected AM3 boards, and will work for sure on am3+ boards using 7xx /8xx chipsets which are available for some time.
Performance is totally unknown.All theoretical estimations put it at least above 2600k in multithreaded and below in singlethreaded.However theres new instructions, AES/AVX/SSE4 .Improvement should be at least from small when using non optimized code, to big using new instructions.Its should destroy Phenom X6 no problem.
Yes BD2 will be on another socket, as for support longevity of Am3+ its unknown.However when in doubt always be pessimistic.
Youre right on the mainboard front.Its no use to buy now, most probably your board is going to be supported (there is bios already) and buying high end mobo with 990FX seems pointless for you as its the same chipset as 890FX.There are differences in mainbord itself, but am3+ is shortlived.Best advice, wait and see.If BD delivers performance and AMD commits somewhat to Am3+ than it might be a good idea, but not before that.
thank you for the reply, I agree with you.
but as you posted
-BD "should" work
- ts should destroy Phenom X6 no problem.
so nothing sure 100%.. I know, maybe I'm asking for something that I cannot know at the moment.
now, "to wait"is the answer.
I would like to wait but my problem is
- if I sell now my CH IV I can surely earn more money than I will earn if CH IV will not support BD or the support will be not good
- in the case that i sell now my ch iv and buy a medium mb am3+ with 990fx (worst than ch iv in phase power), I will be afraid if BD will work better on the CH IV ( It would have been better not sell my CH IV!)
so this is my problem, and I hoped to know something in this days but nothing..
liberato87, you can buy a mobo 990FX for about 120 euros like mine Gigabyte UD3 . It doesnt have to be a highend mobo.
Asus CIV might support BD, check in asus site. At least some old MSI and Asus mb support BD already. Better wait and see.
If I was you, I'd run the old mobo until next BD2 if the old mobo supports BD.
Vishera 8320@ 5ghz | Gigabyte UD3 | 8gb TridentX 2400 c10| Powercolor 6850 | Thermalight Silver Arrow (bench Super KAZE 3k) | Samsung 830 128gbx2 Raid 0| Fractal case
@Liberato87
Of course theres nothing 100% solid as of yet ;-) , were BEFORE launch, and AMD dicks around.
Well, that not fully true.
We know for SURE that ES samples of BD WORK on CH IV.And that they perform like crap
thank you for the reply.
I'm considering buy the ud3 (or the ud5..i dont know what to buy I'm just getting mad) , and if BD will be great, I'll upgrade to CH V.
I would like ro rest with my CH IV, but I'm afraid that if the support will be not great (or if there will be no support on "final" cpu) , I've to sell it under cut price (now I can sell it at good price, I've to add only 10 euro for the ud5)..
sli is also appreciated..
Last edited by liberato87; 06-19-2011 at 08:16 AM.
Do you know of any 790 boards supporting Orochi? Do you know any AM3 Gigabyte boards supporting Orochi? AFAIK, seems like an ASUS only thing to me.
Let me check what AGESA code the latest 890 bioses are.
Smile
the date changed to q3, so there is a date
AMD is not supporting BD on AM3.@Liberato87
Of course theres nothing 100% solid as of yet ;-) , were BEFORE launch, and AMD dicks around.
Well, that not fully true.
We know for SURE that ES samples of BD WORK on CH IV.And that they perform like crap
It's a shame it's been pulled Q3 (I take you would hope August if possible). As a PR move I would of thought some special LN2 editions for the overclockers would have been in the pipeline, just to get the interest going before the mainstream hit the market.
Only a few more months of waiting, it's just a shame it's Q3 now.
He didnt ask if amd supported it.But if asus supported it.
EDIT .I may have misread you.If you were referring not to the compatibility but performance.This sample is crap on 990FX too.
As for the date, its even more granular, presentation on computex had 60-90days for PIB availability.
@BeepBeep.
I didnt tell otherwise, and from what i remember MSI had some models too with AM3 support.I may be wrong tho.And as for the chipsets ,there are AM3+ 7xx series mainboards out there.
-> http://www.gigabyte.pl/products/page...lmt-s2prev_31/
Last edited by XRL8; 06-19-2011 at 01:53 PM.
Double post ,pls del.
Boy i hate new forum software :/
Last edited by XRL8; 06-19-2011 at 01:44 PM.
That doesn't make any sense to me. At all. None of it.
Like the TWKR edition phenom II`s ?They didnt make any sense at all ?
The TWKR Ph2s were probably just leftovers of a run of non-standard chips AMD had run for other reasons. They didn't perform any better iirc.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
You have to remember that TWKR's were C2 stepping, they were out before C3 hit.
I dont know many other C2's that hit nearly 6.8 Ghz:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...Z-amp-SPi1M-WR
http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/phenom_ii_twkr/
Smile
beep has a point.
C2's NEVER HIT 6.8
i have a feeling we will see v2 of the TWKR, but in BD form
...there are a lot of C3's that wont do 6.8.
TWKR were defective leaky chips that wouldnt be suitable to sell in any form as they wouldn't fit TDP vs volts needed for stability, I bet otherwise they'd been scrapped.
Smile
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
MAXIMUS IV EXTREME-Z CPU INTEL 2600K @ 4700 Mhz @ 1,296v liquid cooling by EK supreme hf RAM A-DATA XPG+ V.2 2200 C8 elpida hyper SLI MSI GTX 560ti TWIN FROZRII OC liquid cooling by ek supreme hf vga bridge edition SSD CRUCIAL C300 128GB MONITOR SAMSUNG 2233RZ + NVIDIA 3D VISION KEYBOARD LOGITECH G110 MOUSE LOGITECH MX518
Bookmarks