MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 206

Thread: AMD Officially Denies Bulldozer Delay !

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Buffalo NY
    Posts
    280
    of course AMD is going to deny it.. would be foolish to announce a delay when they know there are people on the fence that have been waiting that otherwise might be persauded to pull the trigger on a 2600k w/ HT instead of waiting.. Frankly i dont think AMD will ever catch up.. they have been behind to many years now. Think Intel is just way to ahead and just keeps pulling rabbits outta their corporate hat! Hope Im wrong but the trend would say Im correct

    Intel i7 2600K 5.0ghz
    Asus P8P67 EVO B3
    Swiftek Apex Ultra Cooling Kit
    Apogee XTL Block
    8 gigs Mushkin 2133 HS DDR3
    (2)PNY Nvidia 570 GTX DDR5 SLI Goodness
    Xonar DX1 Dolby Audio
    120GB RevoDrive SSD -WD Raptr150 + SG 750 x2 +Hitacchi 2TB
    Thermaltake Speedo Advanced Ed
    Corsair 1200AX PSU

  2. #2
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    State of Confusion, USA
    Posts
    2,513
    Quote Originally Posted by viccan View Post
    Frankly i dont think AMD will ever catch up.. they have been behind to many years now.
    Really? You have to remember this is the beginning of a whole new uArch for them.
    Keep in mind what a huge performance jump we saw from Agena to the C3 stepping once they tweaked the design/process...

    Even though AMD doesn't have the funds Intel does for developement, they have some daym good engineers who are willing to take chances.
    BD is a ballzy move for them. It may not be perfect at first, but I wouldn't be so quick to count them out....

    They've bitten the Big Dog (Intel) before, I still have faith in BD's potential!
    AMD FX-8350 (1237 PGN) | Asus Crosshair V Formula (bios 1703) | G.Skill 2133 CL9 @ 2230 9-11-10 | Sapphire HD 6870 | Samsung 830 128Gb SSD / 2 WD 1Tb Black SATA3 storage | Corsair TX750 PSU
    Watercooled ST 120.3 & TC 120.1 / MCP35X XSPC Top / Apogee HD Block | WIN7 64 Bit HP | Corsair 800D Obsidian Case








    First Computer: Commodore Vic 20 (circa 1981).

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Past
    Posts
    447
    Quote Originally Posted by Formula350 View Post
    Well since I can't get info out of him we only can assume it's either the Turbo he was referring to (though he said overclocks, so I dunno), like you said the multipliers, or the (as I understood it) pre-production SuperMicro board. Pretty sure it's not a server board though since it has mutliple full bandwidth PCIe x16 slots, so it'd be a Workstation board. Those could have overclock options (at least back in the day they did) I posted this in the other BD thread, but I'd give a kidney for this thing, screw a damn iPad!! lol
    Well turbo is auto overclocking .As for PCIe x16 slots, there are boards with them, its used for raid arrays, for opencl, cuda ,SSDs etc.
    As for overclocking, amd forbids any overclocking options on their server/worksation sockets, JF insists its bad for business.Its possible that there exist boards with multi option for internal testing, but its hardly believable he owns it for himself.

    Quote Originally Posted by viccan View Post
    .... Think Intel is just way to ahead and just keeps pulling rabbits outta their corporate hat! Hope Im wrong but the trend would say Im correct
    Yea yea, been said after K6-2 when intel had PIII and was on top for long time.Than Athlon happened.Never say never.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •