That's what I'm trying to say, to me it sounds like BS.
I really hope AMD does not delay Bulldozer, want to see it in action already. This wait so so annoying.
AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160
ZOL reported that BD will be mass produce in August, hard launching in September.经过一次又一次的跳票,一份文档再次曝光了推土机的上市日期。从图片中我们看出,推土机架构处理器的产品准 备和产品生产的时间为2011年8月份,而正式上市的时间为2011年9月份。首批上市的处理器包含四款型 号,分别是八核心FX-8150/8100、六核心FX-6100和四核心FX-4100。
chili sauce: http://cpu.zol.com.cn/231/2310866.html
That'd be some seriously bad news, enough to make me build a sandybridge PC if true![]()
i heard nothing about a delay but that doesnt have to mean that there isnt any. ill keep digging...
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
Xtreme SUPERCOMPUTER
Nov 1 - Nov 8 Join Now!
Athlon64 3700+ KACAE 0605APAW @ 3455MHz 314x11 1.92v/Vapochill || Core 2 Duo E8500 Q807 @ 6060MHz 638x9.5 1.95v LN2 @ -120'c || Athlon64 FX-55 CABCE 0516WPMW @ 3916MHz 261x15 1.802v/LN2 @ -40c || DFI LP UT CFX3200-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 SLI-DR || DFI LP UT NF4 Ultra D || Sapphire X1950XT || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 290MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v || 2x256MB G.Skill TCCD @ 350MHz 3-4-4-8 3.1v || 2x256MB Kingston HyperX BH-5 @ 294MHz 2-2-2-5 3.94v
The second slide says "up to 8 MB total L3 Cache" and "Zambezi Core" too, so it's just like a copy of some other fake we saw...2 or 3 days ago except presented in a nicer table? Jesus this is getting ridiculous now.
![]()
Where is the source about these pics?
Slowly feel there's some lurkers that create rumor, then LOL while watching those spreading all over the world. Why the hell amd kept silence?
If they aren't going to start production until August, I don't see how they'd do a real launch in September. It takes longer than a month just to bake a wafer during regular production.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Don't tell me that September is Bulldozer's launch, that is so long.
AMD Threadripper 12 core 1920x CPU OC at 4Ghz | ASUS ROG Zenith Extreme X399 motherboard | 32GB G.Skill Trident RGB 3200Mhz DDR4 RAM | Gigabyte 11GB GTX 1080 Ti Aorus Xtreme GPU | SilverStone Strider Platinum 1000W Power Supply | Crucial 1050GB MX300 SSD | 4TB Western Digital HDD | 60" Samsung JU7000 4K UHD TV at 3840x2160
I wouldn't put too much faith in it. My point was basically that production start to retail launch needs to be longer than the timespan indicated here, which makes its validity questionable. There's a good chance it's BS. We know AMD is announcing the product in three weeks, and at that time they're certain to reveal when they expect retail availability. We'll find out soon enough.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
I am not worried, I think AMD is doing a great job of keeping this quiet. They most likely want to have all the Buz at the tech show, I mean look at all the talk going on everyone will be intrigued and waiting for the news. They probably want to make this the AWE moment be the best show at the event. I have been trying real hard to ignore all the stuff being posted and just wait patiently. Not to much longer till we know if it is or isn't going to launch...
~1~
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
GigaByte X570 AORUS LITE
Trident-Z 3200 CL14 16GB
AMD Radeon VII
~2~
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2950x
Asus Prime X399-A
GSkill Flare-X 3200mhz, CAS14, 64GB
AMD RX 5700 XT
This is from last year:
![]()
As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"
2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case
Wouldn't surprise me a bit if all these 'leaks' are orchastrated by intel's investment wing (who've been implicated in stock manipulation in the past) and/or AMD shorts to affect AMD stock value. AMD finance message boards and tech forums are infested with intel shills and viral marketeers. It's glaringly obvious. Here's a couple examples.
Elmer Phudd the moderator is the biggest intel shill around. And now moderating an AMD finance message board?
http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/sub...ubjectid=36138
Yahoo AMD finance message boards are a cesspool of intel shills (set your rating to 1 star to see any relevant posts).
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/mb/AMD
The same guy necro-posing this thread in Anandtech forums is posting the same crap on Yahoo forums.
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=24796
That's just the tip of the iceburg.
AMD has said repeatedly that performance numbers will only be revealed through their blogs. So are all these fake and unrealistic 'rumors' floating around just intel fanboys having fun? Doubt it. Is it designed to disrupt and manipulate stocks, cause uncertainty? It's starting to look that way.
Last edited by flippin_waffles; 05-25-2011 at 09:46 AM.
This just made me LOL litterally,you do know that intels big dog Ivy bridge chip just got delays to 2h2012 right?
Why would they delay there ivy bridge? because maybe they are waiting to see how well BD does against sandy. if sandy is a better performer they have no reason to put out ivy bridge yet since they will pick up sales from people that were waiting to see how BD will stack up against sandys.
Things get delayed from both sides,its not intels fault that BD is not out yet.It is AMDs fault that Ivy is backed up tho.There is no reason for intel to put out Ivy since there is no BD yet.They can easily sell a crap load of sandys while they wait for BD to hit the streets.
Last edited by Skratch; 05-25-2011 at 10:05 AM.
Bookmarks