The Cardboard Master Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64
Point well taken. But Offshore wind, ocean thermal gradient, tidal, and wave power don't take up any land at all. Geothermal, solar, and biodigesters don't take up any more land per facility than nuclear/coal/etc. They have a lower power density, but wouldn't have to be especially numerous if part of a diversified energy strategy.
I really don't think that even if they used all that to the max they would even be close to the power output of that one plant alone with 6 reactors.
Back in the day when I worked at Lawrence Livermore Lab, 1970- late 1980's they had the Shiva/Nova systems running I thought this would be the answer. Turns out that it wasn't, to many problems getting the beams all hitting the target with the exact same amount of power, plus other problems.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva_laser
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nova_(laser)
Now they have the National Ignition Facility which has a shakey start to it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Ignition_Facility
They also tried the Spheromak MFE Magnets that capped a long tube where plasma inside the tube would supply the heat. These were huge base ball like magnets that capped each end of the tube.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spheromak
And a new way of doing this, Spheromak Tokamak
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spherical_tokamak
So far none of these have been the golden goose of creating more energy that it takes to run them.
Bookmarks