Hehe, whats real and whats not lol.
Its all getting really confusing.
SD..
So 8 core cpu would be just below Nehalem clock-per-clock, and clock higher?
Not too bad at all.
I assume poor multicore speed-up is because when only one core per module is used it has more resources?
2x Dual E5 2670, 32 GB, Transcend SSD 256 GB, 2xSeagate Constellation ES 2TB, 1KW PSU
HP Envy 17" - i7 2630 QM, HD6850, 8 GB.
i7 3770, GF 650, 8 GB, Transcend SSD 256 GB, 6x3 TB. 850W PSU
ahh what?
Those results are WAY off lol.
They suggest a 6 Core Phenom II is 45-60%% faster clock/clock
Phenom II x6:-
Fritz Chess @ 3.0Ghz= 21.4
Cine 11.5 64b @ 3.0Ghz= 5.07
More time wasting screens unfortunatly.
It's a K44 sample, so B0 stepping. Anything below B1 isn't worth bothering with.
and a HP system = HP BIOS hardcoded settingsOriginally Posted by jimbo75
ahh what?
Those results are WAY off lol.
They suggest a 6 Core Phenom II is 45-60%% faster clock/clock
Phenom II x6:-
Fritz Chess @ 3.0Ghz= 21.4
Cine 11.5 64b @ 3.0Ghz= 5.07
More time wasting screens unfortunatly.
right and in single CPU mode 0.94point in R11.5. So, again will be better just waiitng for launch
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
One thing we know for sure, the early eng. samples are crap.
RussC
+1
Veryty.
As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"
Yeah ... it's like that Ivy Bridge sample selling on Ebay ... 1.8Ghz ... :P
Oh...your ass is grass and I've got the weed-whacker.
You're confusing Ivy Bridge and Sandy Brige E, no ?
the dude that sells an ivy bridge now is gonna be f***ed i suppose
Tell it it's a :banana::banana::banana::banana::banana: and threaten it with replacement
D_A on an UPS and life
correct... the SandyBridge E 8 core ... sorryehehhe
And it's 1.6Ghz not 1.8Ghz
Oh...your ass is grass and I've got the weed-whacker.
I've been loosely following this thread for updates and kicks and giggles but with no solid conclusions since I haven't closely followed it. Does that pretty much sum up this thread thus far?
So if I get this right... we're not even sure if BD will compete with BD clock per clock in IPC? Or..I should say it doesn't look very promising? Man if that is the case then I will be disappointed as I've been anticipating launch.
-Cpu:Opteron 170 LCBQE 0722RPBW(2.87ghz @ 1.300v)
(retired)Opteron 146 (939) CAB2E 0540
-Heatsink: Thermalright XP-90
-Fan:120mm Yate Loon 1650 RPM @ 12V, 70.5 CFM, 33dB
-Motherboard: DFI Lanparty nF4 UT Ultra-D
-Ram: Mushkin High Performance blue, 2gigs(2X1gig kit) PC3200 991434
-Hard drive: Seagate 400GB Barracuda SATA HD 7200.10(AS noisey model)
-Video card: evga 6800GS @520/1170
-Case: P180
-PSU:Enermax 535Watt EG565P-VE FMA (24P)
Given the secrets, wait for the E3 in early June.
Athlon II X4 620 2.6Ghz @1.1125v | Foxconn A7DA-S (790GX) | 2x2GB OCZ Platinum DDR2 1066
| Gigabyte HD4770 | Seagate 7200.12 3x1TB | Samsung F4 HD204UI 2x2TB | LG H10N | OCZ StealthXStream 500w| Coolermaster Hyper 212+ | Compaq MV740 17"
Stock HSF: 18°C idle / 37°C load (15°C ambient)
Hyper 212+: 16°C idle / 29°C load (15°C ambient)
Why AMD Radeon rumors/leaks "are not always accurate"
Reality check
It makes sense of course that the older samples are the ones that find their way into the hands of those less concerned with abiding by their NDA. I'm sure there are better samples out there already.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Yes the entire thread is about the solid proof we have of how horrible BD is, in fact it is slower than current Phenom CPUs and it will be a horrible failure. Make sure to repeat this as fact as often as possible, you wouldn't want to waste all of your valuable research.
Is the Release aim Q2 or Q3?
Desktop I5-3570k, 8GB Ram, GTX 560, Silverstone TJ08-E, Crucial M4 128GB, 750W Silver Power, ASUS P8Z77-M
Laptop ThinkPad W520 2720QM /2 x 4 GB ram / Quadro 1000M / Crucial M4 128GB + 500Gb Hdd / FHD Screen / Intel WiFi Link 6300 AGN WLAN / 9 Cell Battery
Laptop 2 New Macbook Pro Retina / i7 QuadCore / 650 GT / 16GB Ram / 512 GB SSD
Server: Athlon II X4 640, ASROCK K10N78, 8GB Ram, LSI MegaRaid 8 port, 64GB Vertex 1, 5 x 1 TB WD Raid6, 3 x 3TB Seagate Raid5
I'm crossing my fingers for a Q2 launch. Hopefully widespread availability by end of June at the latest.
I'm pretty sure AMD doesn't "paper" launch any products anymore. That being the case, a showing in mid June would lead me to the above mentioned date.
As quoted by LowRun......"So, we are one week past AMD's worst case scenario for BD's availability but they don't feel like communicating about the delay, I suppose AMD must be removed from the reliable sources list for AMD's products launch dates"
But if its a big release in June then they need to start shipment pretty soon and then its pretty odd there is no benchmarks out yet? Shipping out that many CPUs is not done in one 1-2 weeks I would think. Normally it seems like shops have the products some days before release as well, so 3 weeks from launch I would guess it would need to ship from the foundrys?I'm crossing my fingers for a Q2 launch. Hopefully widespread availability by end of June at the latest.
I'm pretty sure AMD doesn't "paper" launch any products anymore. That being the case, a showing in mid June would lead me to the above mentioned date.
Desktop I5-3570k, 8GB Ram, GTX 560, Silverstone TJ08-E, Crucial M4 128GB, 750W Silver Power, ASUS P8Z77-M
Laptop ThinkPad W520 2720QM /2 x 4 GB ram / Quadro 1000M / Crucial M4 128GB + 500Gb Hdd / FHD Screen / Intel WiFi Link 6300 AGN WLAN / 9 Cell Battery
Laptop 2 New Macbook Pro Retina / i7 QuadCore / 650 GT / 16GB Ram / 512 GB SSD
Server: Athlon II X4 640, ASROCK K10N78, 8GB Ram, LSI MegaRaid 8 port, 64GB Vertex 1, 5 x 1 TB WD Raid6, 3 x 3TB Seagate Raid5
Exclusive AMD Bulldozer Details From Gigabyte
http://www.rumorpedia.net/exclusive-...from-gigabyte/Today is a good day as we have just received a great picture from Kirllos which was acquired by mega-d botnet.
Where is it from? According to email, it was borrowed from Gigabyte’s corporate network.
Machine is running AMD FX 8110 processor with the maximum TDP of 95W @ 2.8 Ghz and Socket AMD3b 942 package. If you are wondering why it says 3.8 GHz as well, it’s because o the AMD turbo boost.
Is it just me or it totally owns in Wprime??
Never mind superpi result,it rocks tehre too but it's irrelevant one.
If true and if so I definitely know what my next build will be
How does this compare to i7 2600k, for example? How high would it have to be clocked to get similar results?
Is the voltage info legit?
2x Dual E5 2670, 32 GB, Transcend SSD 256 GB, 2xSeagate Constellation ES 2TB, 1KW PSU
HP Envy 17" - i7 2630 QM, HD6850, 8 GB.
i7 3770, GF 650, 8 GB, Transcend SSD 256 GB, 6x3 TB. 850W PSU
God, those results are quite amazing if true.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks