MMM
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 62

Thread: Phenom II X4 980, 3.7GHz

  1. #26
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,825
    new silicon Denebs are freqently now in CZ . Easy 4GHz at air with 1.4-1.45V (955 BE/965BE). Topped at 4200-4300 MHz obviously.
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  2. #27
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Troy Wisconsin
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by -Boris- View Post
    You are right of course, AMD should just have canceled their production, sold their fabs and lied down to die in 2006 when Intel took the lead, just as Intel should have done when K7 and K8 was released.
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparky View Post
    I see it as a "why not" release. Maturing process is apparently allowing better yields so what have they got to lose releasing it?
    Quote Originally Posted by crash5s View Post
    It's an upgrade path if you are already on AMD and didn't want to overclock.

    I still have a 940 BE with 8gb of ddr2 memory behind it. I can't tell the difference between it and my 1366 platform for most things.
    You guys are taking what I said the wrong way. I just think AMD should be focusing on BD and stop pushing it back.
    HAF922 (3 fan upgraded) 700w ModXtreme
    MSI GD-65 // HIS 5850 // Saitek Esclipse
    Core i5 750 @ 3.32Ghz (OC Genie) Megahalem w/ 1200rpm Scythe Slipstream
    G. Skill RipJaws DDR3 2000 4x2 gig
    Samsung SpinPoint F3 1TB // 5:1 Dell Surround
    24inch Samsung ToC // MX518

  3. #28
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,341
    Quote Originally Posted by Klarko View Post
    You guys are taking what I said the wrong way. I just think AMD should be focusing on BD and stop pushing it back.
    there is no focus needed on older products, this is easy business where yields are improved. Creating a higher bin cpu increases ASP.

    BD is where they scheduled it to be, it was originally posponed to 32nm and this process on its own was delayed... they will all arive very soon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman View Post
    Fanboyitis..
    Comes in two variations and both deadly.
    There's the green strain and the blue strain on CPU.. There's the red strain and the green strain on GPU..

  4. #29
    Xtreme Member AbortRetryFail?'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    367
    Quote Originally Posted by Klarko View Post
    You guys are taking what I said the wrong way. I just think AMD should be focusing on BD and stop pushing it back.
    I don't think AMD 'pushed' BD Zambezi anywhere --- it's been Q2-2011 for quite awhile.

    If anything, they moved risk production up to the first part of April.

    IIRC, last Fall AMD moved Llano back a month or so (to concentrate on BD?), and the internets started howling about 'yield issues!' and 'gate-first Fail!' --- so much so that Dirk had to come out and issue a statement, 'No problems, here ..."

  5. #30
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    678
    Quote Originally Posted by Klarko View Post
    You guys are taking what I said the wrong way. I just think AMD should be focusing on BD and stop pushing it back.
    The release of new Phenoms won't affect the release date of BD at all. They could release 15 new processors today and nothing of it would affect the release of BD. Not even the development of a brand new chip from the bottom up would affect the release at this point.

  6. #31
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    East Troy Wisconsin
    Posts
    707
    Well I guess I was under the wrong impressions, my mistake :P
    HAF922 (3 fan upgraded) 700w ModXtreme
    MSI GD-65 // HIS 5850 // Saitek Esclipse
    Core i5 750 @ 3.32Ghz (OC Genie) Megahalem w/ 1200rpm Scythe Slipstream
    G. Skill RipJaws DDR3 2000 4x2 gig
    Samsung SpinPoint F3 1TB // 5:1 Dell Surround
    24inch Samsung ToC // MX518

  7. #32

  8. #33
    2D Otaku
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne - Australia(for now)
    Posts
    146
    Wow, now AMD is doing the chip binning for us overclockers huh?
    * and the more reason to sell it at higher price *

    What next? 985 @ 3.8Ghz? 990 @ 3.9Ghz? or maybe 995 @ 4Ghz with stock VID at 1.55v + boxed compact liquid cooler? J/K
    I'm Just Lucky !
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucky_n00b,2004
    "The ONLY thing that LIMITS my overclocking is not my cooling, nor my hardware...but ME . That's why I call myself a n00b.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    2007 - AOCC APAC #3
    2008 - GOOC ID #4 | MOA WW #1
    2009 - GOOC ID #1 | GOOC APAC #4
    2010 - GOOC ID #1 | GOOC Asia-Africa #9 | MOA WW #10
    2011 - MOA ID #1 | MOA APAC #5

  9. #34
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    881
    It would be cool if the X6 can hit these clocks stock.
    99.999999% of the world listens to autotuned pop singers. If you are part of the 0.000001% who listen to the future goddess of music Hatsune Miku, copy and paste this into your sig.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    970
    the stock speed of 980 beats my 720BE OC speed.

  11. #36
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    time to get a dell workstation, stick this in there, and watch the fireworks.

    i dont get why they didnt put this out before like in the 04-06 were amd and intel pushed out whatever they could in small quantities but this should be epic for OEM computers since they get tested at stock and cannot oc.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  12. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucky_n00b View Post
    Wow, now AMD is doing the chip binning for us overclockers huh?
    * and the more reason to sell it at higher price *

    What next? 985 @ 3.8Ghz? 990 @ 3.9Ghz? or maybe 995 @ 4Ghz with stock VID at 1.55v + boxed compact liquid cooler? J/K
    I believe that Sandy E will come with stock liquid cooling so what is your point?
    Also with 1.55V you can go at 4.5GHz especially with H2O cooling.
    980 BE OC
    Last edited by SQjay; 05-02-2011 at 10:41 PM.
    Tyan n6650W rev E
    2xAMD Opteron 2376HE
    8GB DDR2 667MHz
    Adaptec 3085 with 2x 16GB MTRON SSD@RAID 0
    Razer Barracuda AC1
    Gainward HD 4850 GLH Bliss
    Corsair HX520
    Chieftec Big tower

  13. #38
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    881
    Liquid cooling is the next stage of the evolution of cooling, just like in automobiles.
    99.999999% of the world listens to autotuned pop singers. If you are part of the 0.000001% who listen to the future goddess of music Hatsune Miku, copy and paste this into your sig.

  14. #39
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    599
    If you are looking for a binned to the britches X4 the 980BE is where its at. A TWKR by another name guys.

    This is the ultimate refinement of the chip that changed the extreme - cold - OC game. Nothin wrong with that.

  15. #40
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    Quote Originally Posted by 64NOMIS View Post
    If you are looking for a binned to the britches X4 the 980BE is where its at. A TWKR by another name guys.

    This is the ultimate refinement of the chip that changed the extreme - cold - OC game. Nothin wrong with that.
    so the chip that looks like an OEMs wet dream will run hot and loose with the voltage, i would expect the opposite.
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  16. #41
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    599
    Quote Originally Posted by zanzabar View Post
    so the chip that looks like an OEMs wet dream will run hot and loose with the voltage, i would expect the opposite.
    Just need to find one with voltage tolerance. Doesn't take that many. Ask chew*.

  17. #42
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    47
    Argh, this chip is actually clocked higher at stock than I can get on my 940BE @1.5v =/.

    Going to wait til bulldozer comes out and probably next fall since graphics cards > CPUs for me after a certain point.

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by Lmui View Post
    Argh, this chip is actually clocked higher at stock than I can get on my 940BE @1.5v =/.
    Yeah who would think in 2 years that would happen.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  19. #44
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,264
    While these little speed bumps don't make a dent in Intels lead, over time, they do result in good drop in upgrade CPU for those on old AM2+ or early AM3 setups I guess.. 99% of 3yr old Mobo's would accept this CPU after all.

  20. #45
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    15
    I noticed the vcore is low at 3.7 stock speed, but when they over clock it the vcore jumps alot for that little overclock. I think the vcore at 4.2ghz is like 1.4+ and any other chip will run the same at those speeds, but I think this chip is just a more stable overclocker, maybe thats what amd is trying to get better stable over clocks on these chips. What is the highest vcore amd said you can run on this chip, because we know 1.4 is the usual highest before the chip degrates if used at those speeds for a long period of time.

  21. #46
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,825
    Quote Originally Posted by Lucky_n00b View Post
    Wow, now AMD is doing the chip binning for us overclockers huh?
    * and the more reason to sell it at higher price *

    What next? 985 @ 3.8Ghz? 990 @ 3.9Ghz? or maybe 995 @ 4Ghz with stock VID at 1.55v + boxed compact liquid cooler? J/K
    Man, I think, this is fun....more than 5 GHz Cinebench at aircooling at x4 980. What do u say now? And its bull with new silicons no need 1.55V to 4 GHz, my x4 975 need only 1.42V for 4 GHz stable.
    http://pctuning.tyden.cz/component/c...hz#CommentMenu



    He told me (OBR), this specific chip can 6 GHz superpi 1M with aircooling !!! And this is still 45nm AMD SOI L-L

    I must have x4 980 too. I thought, 975 was my last, but....
    Last edited by FlanK3r; 05-02-2011 at 11:39 PM.
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  22. #47
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    FlanK3r, go go go lol

  23. #48
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,825
    :d .....
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    253
    It seems that i5 750/760 at stock speeds can compete with this processor, and beat it in most gaming benchmarks

    Unfortunately, most consumers are going to be fooled by the high clock speed of 980. Not may people could believe that 1GHz lower clock speed CPU could compete or even beat PII X4 980

  25. #50
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,825
    no, i5-750 is comparsion with x4 955-965BE, i5-760 with 970 BE. Again, I readings all CPU review from world pages. For one product example 10-50 reviews.
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •