Page 11 of 49 FirstFirst ... 89101112131421 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 1225

Thread: Bulldozers first screens

  1. #251
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1, Brazil
    Posts
    888


    Hmm... I find this a leak

  2. #252
    Banned Movieman...
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    1,809
    i call it a fail. Super pi will never be that slow again...

  3. #253
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1, Brazil
    Posts
    888
    theres also a cpu score for vantage

  4. #254
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    There is a stock intel heatsink in that pic... on an intel rig. The AMD is to the right, almost off the picture.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  5. #255
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    SF
    Posts
    1,070
    They didn't want to get caught breaking the NDA so they went to a park to run benchmarks, lol

  6. #256
    Banned Movieman...
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Morais View Post
    theres also a cpu score for vantage
    my moms windows 98 computer can do that...

  7. #257
    Xtreme Enthusiast TheBlueChanell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    565
    Quote Originally Posted by richierich View Post
    They didn't want to get caught breaking the NDA so they went to a park to run benchmarks, lol
    haha. awesome observation.
    Main: 900D - Prime 1000T - Asus Crosshair VI Extreme - R7 1700X @ 4.0ghz - RX Vega 64? - 32GB DDR4 3466 - 1TB 960 Pro -
    --- XSPC AX360 x3 - HK IV Pro - HK RX480 - HK 200 D5 - BP Compression ---
    HTPC: 250D - Prime 850T - Gigabyte G1 ITX - i7 6700K @ 4.5ghz - GTX 1080 Ti - 16GB 3200 - 1TB 960 Pro -
    --- ST30 x UT60 - Kyros HF - KryoGraphics 1080 - HK100 DDC - Monsoon Compression ---
    HV01: Define XL R2 - Prime 1200P - Asus Zenith Extreme - TR 1950X - RX580CF - 128GB DDR4 ECC - 512GB 960P - 4x 2TB RE
    HV02: Node 804 - Prime 850T - SuperMicro X1SSH - E3-1230 v6 - Vega FE - 64GB ECC - 512GB 960 Pro - 4x 6TB Gold -

  8. #258
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    There's no place like 127.0.0.1, Brazil
    Posts
    888
    The cinebench score is too low. Cant say that to the other too since i dont run them.

  9. #259
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,264
    Quote Originally Posted by kuroikenshi View Post
    this statement makes little sense, please elaborate.
    so its neither one, so what is it?

    somehwere between 800 and 2800Mhz?

    It's clearly not 800Mhz.. Performance would never be that good.

    Yet it's clearly not at 2800Mhz either, otherwise they might as well not even release BD at all with the leaked Clockspeeds it's launching at (3200Mhz - 4100Mhz turbo)


    Several people in the thread that seem to be under NDA and have samples have stated, turbo mode, CNQ is not operating properly, and frequencies are obviously moving around somewhere below what the multi is set at.

    These leaked benches are essentially useless, but good to create a laugh on the forums!

  10. #260
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    SF Bay Area, CA, USA
    Posts
    471
    So, your saying the ES parts are not working properly! Great, do I take that to mean the parts are broken. Great. Why would AMD let parts out that don't work, whether the issue is software or hardware? Oh well

    RussC

    Quote Originally Posted by mAJORD View Post
    somehwere between 800 and 2800Mhz?

    Several people in the thread that seem to be under NDA and have samples have stated, turbo mode, CNQ is not operating properly, and frequencies are obviously moving around somewhere below what the multi is set at.

    These leaked benches are essentially useless, but good to create a laugh on the forums!

  11. #261
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    526
    Quote Originally Posted by RussC View Post
    So, your saying the ES parts are not working properly! Great, do I take that to mean the parts are broken. Great. Why would AMD let parts out that don't work, whether the issue is software or hardware? Oh well

    RussC
    it indicates this chip is an early ES

    with bulldozer coming in july (rumoured), all the parameters and bios should have been set in stones.

  12. #262
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by RussC View Post
    So, your saying the ES parts are not working properly! Great, do I take that to mean the parts are broken. Great. Why would AMD let parts out that don't work, whether the issue is software or hardware? Oh well

    RussC
    how about because it's an ES it's probably on an AM3 890Fx board that can't do that power gating right.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  13. #263
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    I have just have to look on the 3Dmark vantage cpu score for understand something is highly wrong in the result, even with a dual core i get faster result .. ( and an old one ) ...

    For the CB result ... even a dual core is faster .... my 2600K with 1 core ( 5ghz ) give 2.04 pnts .. so just imagine something is just not possible with the run they have made .
    Last edited by Lanek; 04-26-2011 at 09:02 PM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  14. #264
    Banned Movieman...
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    illinois
    Posts
    1,809
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanek View Post
    I have just have to look on the 3Dmark vantage cpu score for understand something is highly wrong in the result, even with a dual core i get faster result .. ( and an old one ) ...

    But this was before see the CB result ...
    like i said my moms windows 98 can do that lol

  15. #265
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Hawaii
    Posts
    611
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparky View Post
    There is a stock intel heatsink in that pic... on an intel rig. The AMD is to the right, almost off the picture.
    Ahhh, I see it now. Thanks

  16. #266
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Australia / Europe
    Posts
    1,310
    Quote Originally Posted by qcmadness View Post
    it indicates this chip is an early ES

    with bulldozer coming in july (rumoured), all the parameters and bios should have been set in stones.
    set in stones? or set by stoners?

  17. #267
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    374
    I believe those results are real just because they are so lame. Anyway one shouldnt draw too negative conclusions about first ES benchs.
    "I would never want to be a member of a group whose symbol was a guy nailed to two pieces of wood."

  18. #268
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Now that is an interesting piece of information
    If we assume idle is 800Mhz,as it has always been,and apply 4x (3.2Ghz X8) to C11.5 score of 2.86 ,we arrive to 11.xx score,dangerously close to the score from leaked Donanimhaber slide . I dare not to apply 4x to the poor 3dmark06 score or anything else in that picture since it would go through the benchmarking roof .
    Think, it is not possible about 800 MHz, maybe highewr, some about 1600 MHz or so...
    Score is as Athlon X3 :-)...
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  19. #269
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    535
    Or perhaps something is intentionally obscured. Remember early Athlon ES leaks with the cache disabled? Obviously performance will not be worse than last gen though.

  20. #270
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    US, MI
    Posts
    1,680
    Quote Originally Posted by Morais View Post


    Hmm... I find this a leak
    That's really odd.
    I think it's windows not kicking in the extra power states.

    I would recommend trying win2k3 or xp instead of vista/win7 just incase it was a buggy cpu driver and power management config.

    Scores looks like an itx with gpu on the cpu, or an old amd socket a cpu.

  21. #271
    Xtremely Retired OC'er
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by NEOAethyr View Post
    a buggy cpu driver and power management config.
    MY dad using amd x2 3800+ and new xp driver fix crashes and exc.
    New driver is in windows 7 when it got updated(or maybe comes with first install). Idunno about new cpus how they are. Lots of new x2 6000 series got replaced with new computers simply coz of unstable cpus-without drivers.

    Thats sad news for old forgotten cpus.

  22. #272
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by richierich View Post
    They didn't want to get caught breaking the NDA so they went to a park to run benchmarks, lol
    It's not called benchmarking for nothing... look at all the benches in the background!
    being famished and under the weather can cause blackouts easy(funny enough, usually remedied by taking a dump, which is usually in the form of diahrea due to dehydration)

  23. #273
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    West Covina. CA
    Posts
    1,301
    Quote Originally Posted by stangracin3 View Post
    like i said my moms windows 98 can do that lol
    Can windows 7 even be installed on a Pentium?

  24. #274
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    393
    Quote Originally Posted by Falkentyne View Post
    Can windows 7 even be installed on a Pentium?
    I saw it working on some K6 and PII, so probably...
    also the "Pentium" name is used in some LGA 775, 1156 CPUs.

    but that score (9300?) looks equivalent to something like a 2.8ghz Athlon II X4.

  25. #275
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    272
    People say it has a aftermarket cooler ... as far as i remember, 980x comes with a pretty nifty cooler ... so ... maybe that cooler is the new "reference" for the 8 core?
    Oh...your ass is grass and I've got the weed-whacker.

Page 11 of 49 FirstFirst ... 89101112131421 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •