Bulldozers first screens

[informal]

And what does running at idle do to it?

Well the scores are done at 800Mhz or whatever clock idle is in Zambezi's case. 4x800Mhz or 4x2.86pts fits perfectly with almost 11pts for top end X8 leaked by Donanimhaber 2 months ago.

[muziqaz]

well the only way you can get that low of a score is if you ran all of those at say start up all at the same time.
lol

it looks like he tried all of them at once somehow. lol

it did not work for me, when i tried the same thing. 3dmarks started giving me errors without scores

[informal]

That's because application (3dmark)lost focus . You cannot run anything else (graphical)with 3dmark in parallel.

[muziqaz]

That's because application (3dmark)lost focus . You cannot run anything else (graphical)with 3dmark in parallel.

yep, that's the one I doubt if we could run any other 3d apps at once. unless we have two gpus or something, though never tries it myself.
But anyways, I will take that ~11points anyday I only score 6.87 with phenom x6@3.9ghz

[Mats]

4x800Mhz or 4x2.86pts fits perfectly with almost 11pts for top end X8 leaked by Donanimhaber 2 months ago.

Where do you get 2.86pts from? I'm staring at the pic here.. dunno much about Cinebench, TBH.

[muziqaz]

Where do you get 2.86pts from? I'm staring at the pic here.. dunno much about Cinebench, TBH.

lower left corner in a picture taken by camera.

[informal]

Where do you get 2.86pts from? I'm staring at the pic here.. dunno much about Cinebench, TBH.

It's here. Lower left corner(CB11.5 CPU score).

[XRL8]

i wouldnt say its running idle.But i can say that uncorrectly working turbocore plus cnq can lower scores A LOT, from my own testing, the score was somewhere inbetween idle and what it should be.
This makes me however happy, because if the guy is going to set his cpu manually.We should at last get some decent leaks :-)

[Mats]

lower left corner in a picture taken by camera.

Ooh, thanks. I was looking at the wrong pic..

[Aten-Ra]

You are wrong.
Look here:
http://blogs.amd.com/work/2010/10/25/the-new-flex-fp/
If we have single threaded fp legacy code,one integer core can schedule instructions on both FMACs.

This means one core can have the whole shared FP resources on its disposal if Core 2 has no fp instructions scheduled in FP scheduler.

Core 1
2x128b AVX or 2x128b un-recompiled SSE
or
128-bit FP command

Only one legacy 128-bit FP FMAC per Thread

[Solus Corvus]

Core 1
2x128b AVX or 2x128b un-recompiled SSE
or
128-bit FP command

Only one legacy 128-bit FP FMAC per Thread

Again, from the article:

With each cycle, either core can operate on 256 bits of parallel data via two 128-bit instructions or one 256-bit instruction, OR each of the integer cores can execute 128-bit commands simultaneously

[Olivon]

http://s309.photobucket.com/albums/kk386/blabobby/

[kuroikenshi]

From SA forum,new image:


3dmark06 ~3034pts,lower than Phenom I 9850
C11.5 ~2.86pts, 2.5x lower than 1100T Thuban
Super Pi.... ah who cares anymore lol
The chip this Chinese guy has is evidently a seriously borked ES 6 core Zambezi @ 2.6ghz.

PS now the scores are going further down with each new picture,we are in K7 range now^^.This is clearly terrace testing that ES

LOL I haven't heard that name for a long time!!
BD Terrace ES Edition? "IPC the more he posted about it the more it decreased"
LMFAO

[mattkosem]

pic

pic

http://s309.photobucket.com/albums/kk386/blabobby/

That Cinebench score can't be true. 2.86 is pretty awful. Like slower than a 4 core propos clock for clock.

--Matt

[kl0012]

http://chiphell.com/thread-190177-1-1.html

[Sparky]

http://chiphell.com/thread-190177-1-1.html

Repost police alert: Already posted on the last page and discussed

Guys, think just for a moment:
Does anyone seriously believe that AMD's new flagship CPU they are working on would seriously perform WORSE than their current chip lineup? Do you think they would do that?

[Olivon]

Repost police alert: Already posted on the last page and discussed

Guys, think just for a moment:
Does anyone seriously believe that AMD's new flagship CPU they are working on would seriously perform WORSE than their current chip lineup? Do you think they would do that?

Of course, not

[Mats]

Guys, think just for a moment:
Does anyone seriously believe that AMD's new flagship CPU they are working on would seriously perform WORSE than their current chip lineup? Do you think they would do that?

Exactly, if the BD design was THAT bad then they could just shrink the X6 instead,
which would be a piece of cake and a lot less expensive compared to developing the BD.

[kuroikenshi]

Exactly, if the BD design was THAT bad then they could just shrink the X6 instead,
which would be a piece of cake and a lot less expensive compared to developing the BD.

I stand firm on my decision. weeks ago sold 2600k sys to get BD

[pipoo]

http://s309.photobucket.com/albums/kk386/blabobby/

990FX

LOL Wut? Are they benching outside?

[Manicdan]

i just did the math for cb10 scores

if its at 800mhz and scored 2340pts, thats really insane and translates to 11992 pts single threaded at 4.1ghz, lol
i somehow doubt we can expect that though.

[mAJORD]

It's not 800Mhz, it's not 2800Mhz

[Darakian]

Is that a stock intel heatsink I see on there?
Edit:
That looks like intel stuff everywhere except the single picture of the 990FX silk screen

[Manicdan]

the right side of the second picture shows the same stuff in the top picture
theres afermarket cooling on the amd system

[kuroikenshi]

It's not 800Mhz, it's not 2800Mhz

this statement makes little sense, please elaborate.
so its neither one, so what is it?