MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 1225

Thread: Bulldozers first screens

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by h0bbes View Post
    20%? (sorry)
    100/80=1.25 or 25% less. . If BD's approach achieves 80% of hypothetical non shared approach then we would have : ie. 200pts in some benchmark for hypothetical design; 80% of 200 is 160pts. Now hypothetical design is 200/160=1.25x or 25% faster.
    Last edited by informal; 04-26-2011 at 07:40 AM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    621
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    100/80=1.25 or 25% less. . If BD's approach achieves 80% of hypothetical non shared approach then we would have : ie. 200pts in some benchmark for hypothetical design; 80% of 200 is 160pts. Now hypothetical design is 200/160=1.25x or 25% faster.
    No offense, but... what?

    200 is 25% faster than 160, sure. 160 is only 20% slower than 200, though. The numbers change depending on which number (the bigger or the smaller) you base the comparison on

    Edit: Simply put, the "faster than" or "slower than" establishes that the second number is always the one used as a base amount, so you can't make the calculation the other way
    Last edited by Aerwidh; 04-26-2011 at 09:10 AM.
    Main Rig: Phenom II X6 1055T 95W @3562 (285x12.5) MHz, Corsair XMS2 DDR2 (2x2GB), Gigabyte HD7970 OC (1000 MHz) 3GB, ASUS M3A78-EM,
    Corsair F60 60 GB SSD + various HDDs, Corsair HX650 (3.3V/20A, 5V/20A, 12V/54A), Antec P180 Mini


    Notebook: HP ProBook 6465b w/ A6-3410MX and 8GB DDR3 1600

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •