Last edited by informal; 04-26-2011 at 07:40 AM.
No offense, but... what?
200 is 25% faster than 160, sure. 160 is only 20% slower than 200, though. The numbers change depending on which number (the bigger or the smaller) you base the comparison on![]()
Edit: Simply put, the "faster than" or "slower than" establishes that the second number is always the one used as a base amount, so you can't make the calculation the other way
Last edited by Aerwidh; 04-26-2011 at 09:10 AM.
Main Rig: Phenom II X6 1055T 95W @3562 (285x12.5) MHz, Corsair XMS2 DDR2 (2x2GB), Gigabyte HD7970 OC (1000 MHz) 3GB, ASUS M3A78-EM,
Corsair F60 60 GB SSD + various HDDs, Corsair HX650 (3.3V/20A, 5V/20A, 12V/54A), Antec P180 Mini
Notebook: HP ProBook 6465b w/ A6-3410MX and 8GB DDR3 1600
Bookmarks