-
@CT
There was an issue running the random read tests on both the PCH and the Areca, don't know why, there really shouldn't be any issues with that config.
QD1 (database) using the large testfile was close to 100MB/s, not bad at all.
The Areca results are not so impressive outside cache, compared to the previous runs using the PCH that is 
The latest runs are fine, you don't need to run 100% span, 16GB is sufficient and that might improve the results a few %.
database_qd128_sro_acard_areca.png
fileserver_qd16_acard_areca.png
I've performed a few tests on the 9265 and the results are coming up within 30min or so.
-
Anything with cache is going to be slower with ACARDS. ACARDS are so fast that adding another layer data must travel to just slows everything down. Iodrive manual mentions never to use caching with it since it would just be slower.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks