MMM
Results 1 to 25 of 1124

Thread: Japan quakes

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Quote Originally Posted by Neoclasiccl View Post
    One thing that doesn't make sense to me is they are desperately trying to get the power lines up to power the generators but looking at the buildings I find it hard to believe that all the pumps, pipes, electrical systems are intact. Sure they might get some makeshift pumps in but they could only pump water on and in the reactors and pools. For this to work wouldn't all the containments have to be entact? If not wouldn't it kinda be like trying to pump up a popped balloon; it doesn't work.
    what you see is the cover of the reactor ( who are open to air ), this can look impressive, don't forget they have got an Earthquake of 9.+ richter. ( now specialist have calculate it to 9.4 ).... but this have happend after the reactors cover explode due to the pressure of the Hydrogen ( water used for cool the fuel is transformed in Hydrogen, the pressure increase and .. well you understand what happend next ) ... the problem at start it's they was not able to cooldown the reactors enough and so the water have become Hydrogen ( loaded of different substance toxic and radioactivity ) ... the problem now is not the cover but the fuel bar who need be constantly cool for don't pass from Fiscion ( normal Thermo nuclear controlled operations ) to Fusion... ( uncontrolled operations, what have happend in Tschernobyl in less of some hours ) .. but if really they can't stabilise it, the only solution will be to cover down all the installation ( concrete and sand sarchophage ).. But it's not Russia.. it's an isle, and so all the life in isle in short, half and long term will be unusable... ) and the damage to the isle ( water, earth contamined and so all life in this region ) this will be so dramatic ( if it can be more ) they try now to don't go to this solution. cause you can cover it for don't get a massive cloud who will hit the peoples but you can't stop what will happend next ( the total contamination of the ground, water etc ) and this is actually impossible to revert..
    Last edited by Lanek; 03-18-2011 at 03:42 PM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    29
    I thought they said the containment vessells were cracked on some of the reactors?
    Desktop: I7 930 @ 4.35 ghz
    EVGA X58 SLI Motherboard
    2 EVGA GTX 580's in SLI
    12GB G-Skill DDR3 1600 ram
    Samsung 275t 27inch monitor
    Corsair AX1200w psu
    128GB SSD for OS
    2 Seagate 1TB Raid 0 storage
    LIAN LI PC-A60C (copper edition collectors)
    Laptop: Alienware M17x
    Core2 Duo T9600
    2 GTX-280m's in SLI
    8 Gigs DDR3 1333 ram
    Windows 7 Ultimate on both Rigs

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    on the 3 and 4, but don't forget, now the problem is no more the radioactivity released on air, but the real problem is to don't arrive to uncontrollable fusion of the fuel bar... ( the only way is to cool down the fuel bar )
    As all the vessel are completelly down ( it's a bit more complicate with the reactors 4 as it's an open vessel ), the only way is to cool down the matters ( who enter in fusion in the contact with the air ),
    and so don't go to a similar tcherchnobyl explosion....Whatever is the vessel is open, you need put enough water ( who evaporate in hydrogen ) for keep the bar submerged and cool..... the water can seems a " low" solution, but actually all is in the temperatures of the bar who have been push outisde the reactors ( after the earthquake, it's a securitiy system, the reactor release the bar and in the vessel who are then continuously refresh, immerged in the water, but this exactly where the problem have occur, as the all the safety system have been destroyed and bring unusable after the tsunami who have follow.... the temperature have increase and the level of Hydrogen pressure have make explode the covers of the reactors ......... )
    Last edited by Lanek; 03-18-2011 at 04:02 PM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  4. #4
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanek View Post
    on the 3 and 4, but don't forget, now the problem is no more the radioactivity released on air, but the real problem is to don't arrive to uncontrollable fusion of the fuel bar... ( the only way is to cool down the fuel bar )
    Fission, not fusion. Not even the sun can fuse uranium.

    http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video...hi.itn?hpt=Mid

    So much for the tsunami protection walls...
    Last edited by Hornet331; 03-18-2011 at 05:14 PM.

  5. #5
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004 View Post
    Danger rating is up to 5/7 from 4.. :/
    Which is still under-rating the event... 3mile was 5/7 and now we have 3 reactors and 4 reactor pools in trouble, all of which are bigger than the 3mile reactor too...

    Dctokyo, the fukushima reactor webcam shows a huge cloud of steam?
    Which reactor is it monitoring?
    Is it dai ichi or ni?

    BTW, cnns cover of this event has been terrible.
    Today they showed a map where they even labeled the reactors wrong.
    1 3 2 4 lol Wtf? ^^
    Last edited by saaya; 03-18-2011 at 06:01 PM.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Tokyo, Japan
    Posts
    828
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post

    Dctokyo, the fukushima reactor webcam shows a huge cloud of steam?
    Which reactor is it monitoring?
    Is it dai ichi or ni?
    Sorry it seems it was not of the reactor, I removed the link
    Last edited by dctokyo; 03-18-2011 at 10:02 PM.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    US, MI
    Posts
    1,680
    I found some realtime radiation level map data, some official like stuff here:
    https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/showMap.do

    Unfortunately it's only for the us.
    But it's at least a start, a good chunk of src's in the us isn't to bad...

    I noticed in one of the cnn video's they were monitoring the smoke plume I think, but they didn't mention it...
    I'm thinking of going to look for that data again...

    Can someone interpret the levels seen in some of the California data?
    I'm to lazy lol, I found the data, I'm just to lazy to figuer out how to read it.

    Edit:
    Oh it had hawaii too.
    Can someone interpret this... ?

    Fixed Monitor Location: HI: HONOLULU
    Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/19/2011 12:12:12 AM
    Measurement End Date/Time: 03/19/2011 01:12:20 AM
    Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 0
    Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 1053
    Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 619
    Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 194
    Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 99
    Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 64
    Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 71
    Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 54
    Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 34
    Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 78

    Fixed Monitor Location: CA: SAN FRANCISCO
    Measurement Start Date/Time: 03/18/2011 11:48:32 PM
    Measurement End Date/Time: 03/19/2011 12:48:39 AM
    Beta Gross Count Rate (CPM): 16
    Gamma Energy Range 2 Gross(CPM): 1958
    Gamma Energy Range 3 Gross(CPM): 1249
    Gamma Energy Range 4 Gross(CPM): 368
    Gamma Energy Range 5 Gross(CPM): 196
    Gamma Energy Range 6 Gross(CPM): 130
    Gamma Energy Range 7 Gross(CPM): 152
    Gamma Energy Range 8 Gross(CPM): 98
    Gamma Energy Range 9 Gross(CPM): 29
    Gamma Energy Range 10 Gross(CPM): 37
    Last edited by NEOAethyr; 03-18-2011 at 07:05 PM.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    1,392
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    Which is still under-rating the event... 3mile was 5/7 and now we have 3 reactors and 4 reactor pools in trouble, all of which are bigger than the 3mile reactor too...

    Dctokyo, the fukushima reactor webcam shows a huge cloud of steam?
    Which reactor is it monitoring?
    Is it dai ichi or ni?

    BTW, cnns cover of this event has been terrible.
    Today they showed a map where they even labeled the reactors wrong.
    1 3 2 4 lol Wtf? ^^
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12307698
    ******************************************
    Respec'
    System:Bunch of crappy overclocked PC's that cost an arm and a leg


  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    399
    From that link:

    Midori Horikawa in Tokyo, writes: "Ungrounded panic and paranoia about the situation in Fukushima are making Tokyo a less than liveable place at the moment. I fear that the alarmist media and reactions of foreign governments are mostly to blame for this mass paranoia. Much of the non-Japanese media's reporting is based on pure speculations, prompting foreigners to leave Tokyo... With foreigners leaving the country, however, even the Japanese are growing distrustful of 'the government stories'. I feel that the whole nuclear scare is just a side show to the very real damage brought by the earthquake and tsunami.

    Hear hear...

  10. #10
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles/Hong Kong
    Posts
    3,058
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    So much for the tsunami protection walls...
    Sounds easy, but a simple wall can't overcome the pressure of a tsunami.

    Take the Japan tsunami as an example, the wall has to sustain more than 65000 newtons per square meter of pressure, calculated from an assumed 6m height of the tsunami.
    Team XS: xs4s.org



Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •