-
My perspective is if it works and your system is stable - it's great and no more dangerous than Write Caching in Windows. We are utilizing things in our systems that make them faster but adding degree of risk, like overclocking RAM/CPU/GPU, RAID-0, RAID controllers with cache and no BBU, huge amounts of non-ECC RAM... For SSD's write caching is great. It eliminates a lot of redundant writes and does write combining for what is actually gets written thus making it easier for SSD controllers and NAND itself.
I'm not concerned about FC and WC (Windows Cache) working at the same time. I barely ever see on 4GB equipped system my memory usage going near 3GB... For testing out FC, I will have 8GB of RAM. 3-4GB of that I will dedicate to FC with 30-60 sec flush interval. IMHO the rest 4-5GB for Windows itself is plenty.
Peace...
Sony KDL40 // ASRock P67 Extreme4 1.40 // Core i5 2500K //
G.Skill Ripjaws 1600 4x2Gb // HD6950 2GB // Intel Gigabit CT PCIe //
M-Audio Delta 2496 // Crucial-M4 128Gb // Hitachi 2TB // TRUE-120 //
Antec Quattro 850W // Antec 1200 // Win7 64 bit
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks